You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Terrorist Cell Leaders Clerics Admit They Can't Stop the Killing
2006-10-29
October 29, 2006: This month, the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) sponsored a meeting of Sunni and Shia religious scholars in Saudi Arabia. The OIC issued a Fatwah calling on Iraqis to stop killing each other. This was accepted by the major Shia and Sunni clerics in Iraq. But the clerics agreed that their plea would likely be rejected by the hard core killers. There are several groups of these, each with specific reasons to keep up the mayhem. The Sunni Arab killers are largely motivated by a desire to avoid prison or execution for atrocities committed while serving in Saddam's government, especially in the security forces. That, in turn, has spawned groups of Kurds and Shia Arabs who are seeking vengeance. The Shias are the most lethal, because there are more of them, and some of the Shia death squads are working for the Iranian government. The Iranians are still eager to punish those responsible for starting the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war. For the Iranian government, those considered most guilty are the senior members of the Baath party. Saddam Hussein has led that party since the 1970s, but the Iranian death lists contain several thousand names. For Iran, there can be no peace until all these Baath Party officials are dead. For the Sunni Arab terrorists, there can be no peace until the revenge killing stop. Two years ago, most Iraqi Sunni Arab terrorists were motivated by the desire to put the Baath Party back in power. But now, just survival would be nice.

While the Shia and Sunni scholars agree on the need to end the violence, they don't agree on some fundamental religious and political issues. Many Iranian clerics believe that the Saud family, and their Sunni Arab allies, who currently run Saudi Arabia, are not legitimate rulers. The more extreme Iranian clerics believe that the Saudi Shias, who comprise about five percent of the Saudi population, should be in charge. The Iranian government is more circumspect on this issue, but would be under tremendous popular pressure to get involved, if there was a major Shia rebellion in Saudi Arabia. The Saudi Shias are concentrated in the east, where most of the oil is.

Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#9  Nothing but professional handwringing. These assholes have no intention of reaching any sort of peaceful compromise, because that it what it would require, compromise. Sharing power is contrary to all things Islamic and the sun will explode sooner than Sunnis and Shias ever learn to coexist. Not that I would particularly mind them continuing to slaughter each other, except these assholes have enough excess Killer Kapacity™ to keep sending their murderous thugs after us too.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-10-29 13:36  

#8  Lol, yup. They're actually victims, I guess. They only screeched on Fridays - and look at the mess their followers have made, lol.
Posted by: .com   2006-10-29 11:56  

#7  it's like all those old looney toons cartoons where yosemite sam starts rolling the snowball down the hill and gets caught up in it...
Posted by: Abdominal Snowman   2006-10-29 11:49  

#6  I've finally come to the realization that it's like a gravity thingy.

They can start the ball rolling down the hill.

They can't stop the ball, if if they were inclined - which they're not, once it's rolling.

Oh well, their bad.
Posted by: .com   2006-10-29 11:03  

#5  What's missing in Islam?

Morality.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2006-10-29 10:53  

#4  What's missing in Islam? Perhaps a Reformation? An Enlightenment movement? Sunni versus Shia. Its all the same Shiite to me.
Posted by: Lancasters Over Dresden   2006-10-29 10:33  

#3  While the Shia and Sunni scholars agree on the need to end the violence, they don't agree on some fundamental religious and political issues

Catch 22 isn't it. Religious and political "issues" advocate - nay, demand - violence. They'd like their enemies to die quietly and stop being violent when attacked. But, everybody is a enemy in islam. Or meat, left out to be eaten by cats. Violence drives this "religion". If they stopped killing, they wouldn't be pious muslims. Islam kills. It's what they do.
Posted by: Thinemp Whimble2412   2006-10-29 10:28  

#2  Yeah, set the devil free and then ask him to stop? Not likely in the religion of APATHY.
Posted by: closedanger@hotmail.com   2006-10-29 10:04  

#1  I call BS on the Iranian motivation - IMHO, it's power and control, not revenge
Posted by: Frank G   2006-10-29 09:35  

00:00