You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Fifth Column
Ted Kennedy, Soviet Stooge
2006-10-24
KGB Letter Outlines Sen. Kennedy's Overtures to Soviets, Prof Says
The antipathy that congressional Democrats have today toward President George W. Bush is reminiscent of their distrust of President Ronald Reagan during the Cold War, a political science professor says. "We see some of the same sentiments today, in that some Democrats see the Republican president as being a threat and the true obstacle to peace, instead of seeing our enemies as the true danger," said Paul Kengor, a political science professor at Grove City College and the author of new book, "The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism."

In his book, which came out this week, Kengor focuses on a KGB letter written at the height of the Cold War that shows that Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) offered to assist Soviet leaders in formulating a public relations strategy to counter President Reagan's foreign policy and to complicate his re-election efforts.

The letter, dated May 14, 1983, was sent from the head of the KGB to Yuri Andropov, who was then General Secretary of the Soviet Union's Communist Party. In his letter, KGB head Viktor Chebrikov offered Andropov his interpretation of Kennedy's offer. Former U.S. Sen. John Tunney (D-Calif.) had traveled to Moscow on behalf of Kennedy to seek out a partnership with Andropov and other Soviet officials, Kengor claims in his book.

At one point after President Reagan left office, Tunney acknowledged that he had played the role of intermediary, not only for Kennedy but for other U.S. senators, Kengor said. Moreover, Tunney told the London Times that he had made 15 separate trips to Moscow. "There's a lot more to be found here," Kengor told Cybercast News Service. "This was a shocking revelation."

It is not evident with whom Tunney actually met in Moscow. But the letter does say that Sen. Kennedy directed Tunney to reach out to "confidential contacts" so Andropov could be alerted to the senator's proposals. Specifically, Kennedy proposed that Andropov make a direct appeal to the American people in a series of television interviews that would be organized in August and September of 1983, according to the letter.
Rest at link.
Posted by:ed

#13  xbalanke...Mass citizens would vote for him regardless of what he does: murder, treason, lying, philandering, drunkeness, DUI. It does not matter.
Posted by: anymouse   2006-10-24 19:36  

#12  For a guy who gets away with murder - what difference should a little treason make?

Right. Even if it's true it won't matter. My fellow sheep citizens of Mass would re-elect him even if he was caught in bed with a live boy and a dead girl.
Posted by: xbalanke   2006-10-24 12:46  

#11  I Have read that they vote for him to keep him off Massachussets' streets.
Posted by: SwissTex   2006-10-24 11:40  

#10  Apologies, I posted this a year or two ago, but it seems to apply here, for some reason...

If a man once indulges himself in murder,
very soon he comes to think little of robbing;
and from robbing he next comes to drinking
and sabbath-breaking, and from that to
incivility and procrastination.

-- Thomas DeQuincy
Posted by: .com   2006-10-24 11:33  

#9  what difference does it make? The only thing that will ever make him leave his office with be the cold hand of death. Massachussets is a mess. One big money suck from the hardworking taxpayers into the pockets of organized crime. For a guy who gets away with murder - what difference should a little treason make?
Posted by: anon   2006-10-24 11:30  

#8  I hold no brief for Kennedy, but this seems a somewhat tenuous chain: What Chebrikov said that Tunney said that Kennedy said...
Posted by: James   2006-10-24 11:22  

#7  This fat, f**kin' whale has been a traitor since he stepped onto the Senate floor. He did every possible thing he could to subvert our military in Nam also. He was constantly trying to undercut defense spending budgets, or dreaming up some investigative committee to foul up the works. This fool has been a complete bottom feeding dirtbag his entire life. He should have been charged with murder in the Kopechne case. I cannot believe how the voters in Massachusetts can justify this low life as their Senator. But , to confirm how ignorant they really are, they've put another loser in with him. Our favorite...Kerry. Just as bad as the Kalifornia rubes with the dunce twins, Feinstein and Boxer babe.
Posted by: SpecOp35   2006-10-24 11:15  

#6  NOT FRIGGIN SURPRISED! I also would not be surprised to learn that some of our current politicians (Democrats) were secretly discussing surrender with the bad guys. LetÂ’s not forget that Biden and Kerry flew to Nicaragua to kiss NoriegaÂ’s ass while Reagan was fighting a proxy war there. Yup you can really trust those Dems with matter of national security.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2006-10-24 10:49  

#5  Does anyone think this isn't happening now? We have Bagdad Bob [McDermitt D-AlQuada] working with Saddam and CAIR. Who knows what Ted Kennedy is doing.

And no, Kennedy isn't a KGB Stooge - he knew exactly what he was doing.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2006-10-24 08:16  

#4  This one needs the graphic showing the surpise meter reading zero.
Posted by: no mo uro   2006-10-24 07:27  

#3  Hm, liberals conniving with the enemy in order to score points at home...where have I seen this before?

And the media totally ignoring it...sounds familiar somehow.
Posted by: gromky   2006-10-24 07:27  

#2  Ted Kennedy, KGB stooge.
Posted by: Fred   2006-10-24 07:26  

#1  So, he secretly asked for a foreign power, specifically one inimical to the United States, to intervene in internal political matters.

This surely fits the spirit and letter of the definition of treason.
Posted by: DanNY   2006-10-24 07:13  

00:00