Submit your comments on this article | ||||
India-Pakistan | ||||
Taliban-style militants roam Pakistan region after pact | ||||
2006-10-24 | ||||
![]() Sitting cross-legged in a bazaar near the Afghan border, the two bearded militants say the arrangement is an inconvenience rather than a barrier to their goals to wage "jihad", or holy war, against U.S.-led forces in Afghanistan. "The border is not just in Waziristan," 25-year-old Mohib, who declined to give his full name, said with a smile as he sat in a market stall in Miranshah, the main town of Pakistan's North Waziristan border region. "If you can't go into Afghanistan from Waziristan, you can go from other areas. There are many, many other ways to go," he told Reuters, stroking his beard with one hand, while holding an AK-47 assault rifle with the other.
But since the deal was clinched, attacks against U.S.-led NATO troops and Afghan government forces have tripled in eastern Afghanistan, especially in areas bordering North Waziristan. Nevertheless, the United States and Afghanistan have adopted a wait-and-see approach with the accord under which militants in Waziristan promised to halt attacks inside Pakistan as well as across the border in Afghanistan.
Mujahideen, or "holy warriors", flocked to the border region in the 1980s to battle Soviet invaders in Afghanistan. Many left Afghanistan and sought refuge in Waziristan after U.S.-led forces ousted Afghanistan's Taliban in 2001. From there, they infiltrated back into Afghanistan to fight foreign and government troops, until last months' deal.
Under the deal, tribes can be held responsible and punished for any violation to the agreement in line with tribal law. Punishment includes having vehicles confiscated by the government and shops and houses demolished or sealed. Residents said crime had fallen since the militants took over security responsibilities in the region, though several people accused of being "American informers" had been killed. "We're happy that they have taken charge of law and order. We don't have robberies anymore," said one resident. The situation is similar to that in adjacent South Waziristan, where militants virtually took over after months of fighting with Pakistani forces. Many locals oppose President Pervez Musharraf and his support for the U.S.-led war on terrorism. Before the latest deal was reached,
Maulana Abdul Khaliq Haqqani, a member of a militant council, or shura, said his followers were strictly abiding by the pact, though he said the government had yet to keep its promises, such as compensation for families of those killed in the fighting. Haqqani, who is also a firebrand cleric, said they were not sending militants into Afghanistan but still offered "moral support" to those fighting jihad there. "There is no doubt that we support this jihad against infidels, against these Christians who have invaded a Muslim land ... We support oppressed people in Afghanistan and we pray for their success," he said. | ||||
Posted by:Fred |
#1 Many locals oppose President Pervez Musharraf and his support for the U.S.-led war on terrorism.??? How about "No locals who express support for President Pervez Musharraf and who don't wholedheartedly support Islamic terrorism could be found. On the other hand, we didn't ask much about it for fear of being killed." |
Posted by: Slaviger Angomong7708 2006-10-24 20:19 |