You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Down Under
Australia's worst drought in recorded history
2006-10-17
AUSTRALIA'S record drought may slice $3 billion from export earnings and cut economic growth by as much as 1 per cent this year.

The bleak forecast, which will affect the election-year federal budget, comes as the Howard Government prepares to soften drought assistance guidelines to help stricken farmers.

Senior Coalition figures yesterday hit back at claims the Government was wasting money by helping out marginal farmers.

But Canberra also came under pressure from state governments - and its own backbench - to extend emergency relief to other states and to agricultural contractors, such as harvesters.

The farm sector represented just 2.7 per cent of Australia's economy last year, but the drought could cut its total output by 40 per cent this year.

Private sector economists are re-assessing their forecasts for economic growth following widespread failure of spring crops.

Commonwealth Bank chief economist Michael Blythe said previous droughts had reduced Australia's economic growth by between 0.5 and 0.75 percentage points. "If you're only growing at 2per cent or so at the moment, then that is quite a sizeable reduction," Mr Blythe said.

Private economists are forecasting similar growth reductions, although some, including ABN Amro and ANZ, say there is a risk of a larger fall of about 1per cent.

The Productivity Commission recently calculated that the last three droughts had each reduced economic growth by 1 percentage point.

Peter Costello last week said Australia was suffering a "rural recession", but he was unwilling to quantify the impact on the overall economy. Yesterday, he told Coalition MPs the drought was a serious economic issue.

The Government has come under attack for propping up unviable farms, with a leading water scientist, Peter Cullen, and the Australia Institute, arguing it would be better to steer these farmers off the land.

But Deputy Prime Minister Mark Vaile yesterday attacked these suggestions as "outrageous", while Nationals' MP Bruce Scott called them "un-Australian".

The Nationals leader told Parliament Australia had very low levels of agricultural subsidies compared to Europe, Japan and the US. "We do not prop up unviable farmers in Australia. Australia's farmers are very competitive and they are facing dire circumstances," Mr Vaile said.

The Government will further ease drought relief guidelines with an announcement expected within a week. The new measures, costing $350 million, are expected to be extended to South Australia and Western Australia.
Posted by:Oztralian

#5  doom and gloom.
Posted by: anon   2006-10-17 23:42  

#4  A family friend just left the wine biz in NSW... to much Oz wine to make it worthwhile.

Posted by: 3dc   2006-10-17 18:38  

#3  The headline is misleading to say the least. Certain areas may have been the driest recorded, but overall the last 12 months have been averagely wet, even wetter than normal across Australia. However, large areas of the southeast have been particularly dry with the excess rain falling in the north (typical of an el nino year).

What has happened is the media has picked up on the issue and the government has taken the opportunity to give money to its supporters.
Posted by: phil_b   2006-10-17 16:57  

#2  close to importing wheat is correct....the sucicide figure is one rural sucicide every 4 days....not one in 4 .....
Posted by: Snelet Sniter6609   2006-10-17 16:28  

#1  Australia is close to relying on foreign countries to import wheat & 1 out of every 4 farmers are said to commit suicide.
Posted by: Oztralian   2006-10-17 16:16  

00:00