You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
UN imposes stringent sanctions
2006-10-15
The UN Security Council voted unanimously on Saturday to impose financial and weapons sanctions on North Korea for its nuclear test, which the resolution called a "clear threat to international peace and security."

The US-drafted resolution allows nations to stop cargo going to and from North Korea to check for weapons of mass destruction or related supplies.
The US-drafted resolution allows nations to stop cargo going to and from North Korea to check for weapons of mass destruction or related supplies. It was adopted after the United States, Britain and France made some modifications to dealt with last-minute objections from Russia and China. "Today we are sending a strong and clear message to North Korea and other would-be proliferators that there will be serious repercussions in continuing to pursue weapons of mass destruction," US Ambassador John Bolton told the Security Council's 15 members.

The resolution requires all countries to prevent the sale or transfer of materials related to Pyongyang's unconventional weapons programs.
The resolution requires all countries to prevent the sale or transfer of materials related to Pyongyang's unconventional weapons programs. And it demands nations freeze funds overseas of people or businesses connected with North Korea's nuclear and ballistic missile programs. In a concession to China, the resolution specifically excludes the use of force, but allows economic sanctions and a restriction on naval and air transport. But by allowing cargo inspection, the document still puts an international imprimatur on the US-led Proliferation Security Initiative. This was launched in May 2003 and encourages countries to interdict weapons from North Korea, Iran and other states of concern.

North Korea's UN ambassador said his country "totally" rejected the Security Council's resolution.
North Korea's UN ambassador said his country "totally" rejected the Security Council's resolution. Ambassador Pak Gil Yon told the council at a public meeting that Pyongyang conducted a nuclear test because of the "hostile policies" of the United States.

Wang Guangya, China's UN ambassador, told the council Beijing still opposed interdiction and urged nations not to take "provocative steps." The resolution also drops a ban on all arms going to North Korea, but it puts an embargo on all large-sized conventional arms.

In Washington, a US intelligence analysis showed radioactivity in air samples collected near the suspected nuclear test site, a US official said on Friday, five days after Pyongyang announced it conducted the test. "That's right, though this is only a first look. People have been saying all along that the working assumption is it was a nuke," said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

US President George Bush had used his weekly radio address to the nation to urge world powers to pass tough sanctions on North Korea and said Pyongyang must face "real consequences" for the nuclear weapons test.

With China fearing a flood of refugees from a sudden collapse of North Korea, which was sorely tested yet survived the demise of the Soviet Union, the death of its founder and a famine that may have killed 10% of its people in the 1990s, some questioned what impact any sanctions would have.
Former South Korean President Kim Dae-jung , the architect of South Korea's engagement policy with the North, blamed US policy in part for the nuclear crisis on the Korean peninsula, which he said could only end if Washington held direct talks with Pyongyang leaders.
"North Korea is already very familiar with poverty," former South Korean President Kim Dae-jung told Reuters in Seoul on Saturday. "The country can also get support, at least in order to survive, from countries such as China."

Kim, the architect of South Korea's engagement policy with the North, blamed US policy in part for the nuclear crisis on the Korean peninsula, which he said could only end if Washington held direct talks with Pyongyang leaders. "The United States must talk to North Korea," Kim said in an email interview. "We have to talk not only with friends but also with enemies, if necessary."

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice will visit China, Japan and South Korea from October 17 to 22. A US official said Rice would also likely travel to Russia during the trip. Those five countries had been engaging North Korea in the "six-party talks" aimed at getting North Korea to abandon its nuclear program in exchange for aid and security guarantees.


Highlights of the UN resolution:
Calls upon countries to take "co-operative" action through inspection of cargo to and from North Korea to prevent illicit trafficking in nuclear, chemical or biological weapons and related materials.

Decides that North Korea should abandon all nuclear weapons and existing nuclear programs and ballistic missiles programs in a "complete, verifiable and irreversible" manner.

Bans trade with North Korea on battle tanks, armoured combat vehicles, large calibre artillery systems, combat aircraft, attack helicopters, warships, missiles or missile systems.

Ban trade with North Korea in all items, materials, equipment, goods and technology that could contribute to the country's nuclear-related, ballistic missile-related or other weapons of mass destruction-related programs.

Bans luxury goods going to North Korea.

Decides all countries should freeze funds, other financial assets and economic resources that are owned, controlled, directly or indirectly by people engaged in or providing support for North Korea's unconventional weapons.

Allow a travel ban on people and their families supporting or promoting North Korea's policies on dangerous weapons programs, providing names are approved by a Security Council sanctions committee.

Encourages efforts to intensify diplomatic efforts, refrain from any actions that might aggravate tension and to facilitate the early resumption of the six-party talks, between North Korea, South Korea, the United States, Russia, China and Japan, aimed at convincing Pyongyang to abandon its nuclear ambitions.
Posted by:Fred

#21  Heh, 3dc. You should work for the CIA or DIA, my man, lol.
Posted by: .com   2006-10-15 23:58  

#20  .com
SimCity was much more fun if you did the following.

Play it for a day by just letting it sit there.
Diff it with a save-game at the beginning.
See what changed and hack the date and $ so you start in 1700 and have zillions of dollars..

Design to your heart's content.
Posted by: 3dc   2006-10-15 23:37  

#19  Pretty obvious you barbarians never made it to the Stargate.

Irrigation rulz!
Many peoples, no cow.
Posted by: Ghandi   2006-10-15 10:57  

#18  Going for the score in CivII is incredibly boring. The spaceship is OK, but then the goal becomes maximize future technologies and optimize population. In 1850 or so it goes to a year a turn and really slows down. I've seen 500% scores, but prefer the race horse method. I've wiped them all out in 1200 but 910 is really impressive. Just getting there is a challenge at that point.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-10-15 10:47  

#17  Kim Jung Il and his top aides live very poshly. He's fond of certain top label cognacs, for instance.
Posted by: lotp   2006-10-15 10:39  

#16  My favorite is

Bans luxury goods going to North Korea

Yeah, right, there's a big NORK demand for edible BMW's.
Posted by: Matt   2006-10-15 10:26  

#15  Kim Dae-jung is a disgrace.

His country could foment to the collapse of the North if it wanted to. But for corrupt and craven reasons it refuses to do so.

Instead he is blaming the US, the country without which he would be eating grass, for not holding bilateral talks that would have the net effect of securing the future of the Kim family regime -- the most repressive regime in the world.

South Korea is not an ally. We need to get off the peninsula ASAP and smoke Kimmies ass. Hopefully these sanctions will help push the regime a step towards collapse.
Posted by: JAB   2006-10-15 10:08  

#14  that was nothing they will keep on building need to stop things they need ffod gas money etc.
Posted by: Hupavitle Shinesh2963   2006-10-15 09:43  

#13  Lol. I loves the skeery skulls that show up to show pollution, lol. BTW, I'm disappointed you don't have the option of crashing aircraft into enemy cities and units. In some version of Sim City there was a traffic helicopter that you could click on with the cursor and it would crash the chopper. There was audio of the pilots saying, "We're going down! We're going down!" Great fun. Lol.
Posted by: .com   2006-10-15 09:41  

#12  910 AD? that is purty good there! Litterally, global domination with spears and swords. I used to love to wait till I could get a nuke and then win, cuz, I just love set'em off! Waitin' till you get a space colony is definitely a peace weanie kinda strategy.

Can't you just see a little UN graphic making an appearance on your shores and planting a stringent resolution on ya? That would be hillarious!
Posted by: TomAnon   2006-10-15 09:34  

#11  Oops, you're right, TW - the other way to win is space flight, not acquiring nuke power, lol. I've only done that once - long ago. You can tell which ending I concentrate on, heh. My earliest Global Domination win was in 910 AD, lol. Highest score was 80% (not same game). I presume you've gotten a higher rating cuz you're like all peaceful 'n stuff. Lol.
Posted by: .com   2006-10-15 08:07  

#10  I prefer racing for the space colony to win with CIvII myself. Great game!
Posted by: Thinemp Whimble2412   2006-10-15 08:03  

#9  john - It could get very interesting, no? I'd be particularly pleased if some Chinese freighter refused inspection, was boarded (perhaps diabled to make that possible) and NorKie military shit was found onboard.

Might accelerate the "playoff schedule" by a decade.
Posted by: .com   2006-10-15 08:02  

#8  Lol, G-man, dunno what that meant, 'zactly, but I assure I enjoy waxing your ass in Civ II. Big fun ina leetle box, y'know? Lol.
Posted by: .com   2006-10-15 07:58  

#7  Although it sounds like China is trying to weasel on that point

I've read that China is insisting that Chinese flagged ships be exempted from any inspection.
Posted by: john   2006-10-15 07:57  

#6  Ima feel all faintified by this UM thingy sent out most recent.


.com Please to eat my irrigation and food harvest barbarian swine.
Posted by: Ghandi   2006-10-15 07:55  

#5  Like, we're totally rejecting the resolution. Gag us with a spoon...
Posted by: Valley Girl   2006-10-15 07:50  

#4  Authorizing cargo inspection is the important part here. Although it sounds like China is trying to weasel on that point - maybe playing a bit of good cop/bad cop.
Posted by: SteveS   2006-10-15 07:32  

#3  
Posted by: john   2006-10-15 07:29  

#2  My favorite computer game is not one of the snazzy new super-graphics games, it's Civilization II. You win by either wiping out everyone else on the planet - or being the first to discover nukes.

I'm glad they left out toothless "stringent" UN sanctions, having your hands politically tied by gutless turds, and waiting for the end to come at the hands of evil assholes who are mere cartoonish caricatures to the clueless.
Posted by: .com   2006-10-15 07:07  

#1  Ugh...yet another tiresome charade by the vaunted international community. Besides little Kimmy, some of Kofi's relatives, and France, I wonder who's going to make a fortune off of this.
Posted by: JerseyMike   2006-10-15 02:55  

00:00