Submit your comments on this article |
China-Japan-Koreas |
UN divided over action against N Korea |
2006-10-05 |
![]() Japan's U.N. Ambassador Kenzo Oshima, this month's council president, sought backing from the 15 members for a statement that if North Korea went ahead the council would undertake further action, though it did not specify what that should be. "I think it is important for the international community, through the council, let North Korea understand that noncompliance would involve some consequences," Oshima said. The Japanese draft expressed "deep concern" over North Korea's threat and said a nuclear test would "jeopardize peace, stability and security in the region and beyond." It said North Korea should abandon all nuclear weapons programs and resume six-party talks on the issue with China, Japan, Russia, South Korea and the United States. |
Posted by:Fred |
#4 "Chardonnay or Burgundy?" |
Posted by: UN-manned 2006-10-05 11:39 |
#3 Wake me up if they're not divided, please. |
Posted by: gorb 2006-10-05 05:22 |
#2 FOX NEWS > USA will NOT live? with a nuclear North Korea. CHARLES HRAUHAMMER [paraphrased] > The UNO/UNSC will do little or nothing to stop North Korea - "what will happen is that JAPAN will RE-ARM", or the least become more motivated to re-arm + begin to use its newfound military strength in support of Japanese interests around the world. The starving Norkies know they have no manifest destiny save to PC live-and-die for CHINA's interests, at China's command. IFF THE COMMON AGENDA FOR THE USA + ASIAN DEMOCRACIES-NEUTRALS IS THE CONTAINMENT OF CHINA'S AMBITIONS FOR ASIAN-PACIFIC HEGEMONY, THEN ALL HAVE AN INDIRECT BUT SIGNIFICANT AND RISQUE' STAKE IN NORTH KOREA DEV NUKE WEAPONS IFF DE FACTO INDEPENDENT FROM CHINESE CONTROL. This is why US-Allied INTEL have to VERIFY the TRUE INTENT/PREMISES + LT AGENDA OF PYONGYANG vv the CHICOMS. |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2006-10-05 00:36 |
#1 *snicker* What was it Captain America said yesterday? "The UN will now swing into inaction"? Lol. The UN is always divided, along lines of interest, of course. For all the little bubbles to cover the same spot is nigh unto impossible, especially when triangulation is a key component of the foreign policy of veto-wielding members. Total waste of time. |
Posted by: .com 2006-10-05 00:32 |