You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
US, Iraqi forces arrest Sadr aides in holy city
2006-09-22
NAJAF, Iraq - A top aide and three supporters of Shia radical leader Moqtada Sadr were arrested in a pre-dawn swoop by US and Iraqi forces in the Shia holy city of Najaf Thursday, as part of a nationwide crackdown on sectarian violence. Salah Al Obeidi, a close colleague of Sadr, was picked up from his home in Najaf along with cleric Bassim Al Ghuraifi, the radical leaderÂ’s office said. Two others were also arrested, but their identities were not immediately known.

A spokesman for Sadr’s group in Baghdad, Hazem Al Aaraji, denied he was one of those arrested as reported earlier, but confirmed that security forces had surrounded his house in the Shia shrine district of Kadhimiyah. “Military forces sealed off my house for three hours,” Aaraji told AFP, without specifying whether they were American or Iraqi.
Hope they're American, you'll get treated better.
Sadr’s representatives accused US forces of “carrying out arrests and seeking to destabilize regions where security prevails”. “Americans want confrontation with Sadr because this movement is gaining in popularity. We are trying hard to avoid confrontation and to pursue other ways to resolve this issue,” Sheikh Abderrazzak Al Midawi said in Najaf.
"Please don't turn us over to the Sunnis!"
A member of Sadr’s movement in Najaf, Sheikh Moayed al-Khazraji told reporters that the cleric had called for the crisis to be resolved “peacefully.” “Sayyed Sadr is keen to avoid the shedding of Iraqi blood and calls for calm,” he said.
"Please don't turn us over to the Kurds!"
The US military would neither confirm nor deny the arrests. “We are carrying out continuous operations against individuals we believe are responsible for sectarian violence in the country,” US military spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Barry Johnson told AFP.
Posted by:Steve White

#16  holy city or holy shit?
Posted by: Captain America   2006-09-22 19:41  

#15  Every Abu needs his BCK. Good thinking RD.
Posted by: 6   2006-09-22 17:10  

#14  Obeidi, oblyda, life goes on...
Posted by: Chuck Simmins   2006-09-22 14:15  

#13  A top aide and three supporters of Shia radical leader Moqtada Sadr were arrested in a pre-dawn swoop by US and Iraqi forces in the Shia holy city of Najaf Thursday

release 'em with Bling Conversion Kits.

Gold Crucifix and Chain

Gilt Leather Bound Bibles

Waterford Crystal Vessels of Holy Water

Big Ass Photos w/ 'em Kissing the Pope's Ring.
Posted by: RD   2006-09-22 12:52  

#12  Not just Najaf. Recently, US and Iraqi Army have been taking Shiite neighborhoods and arresting Sadr's black clad terrorists. They are shrinking the areas the Madhi Army can operate in Baghdad. Because of this, fighting has been increasing and expect a big fight once forces reach Sadr City.
Posted by: ed   2006-09-22 12:35  

#11  We should release them now at exactly the same lat and long we took them from (alititude is another issue). ;^)
Posted by: rjschwarz   2006-09-22 11:26  

#10  Even better, a delivery van should pull up to the house w/a generator, frig, latest computer, killer (and I do mean killer) stereo system, new matresses, linens, etc.
Posted by: anonymous2u   2006-09-22 10:07  

#9  As I understand it the tater tots are very unpopular in Najaf so arresting them there isn't too difficult.

The more difficult problem is in baghdad where the tater tots are responsible for hundreds, probably thousands, of murders (although many of the people murdered were probably Baathist scum, al-Q agents, etc. themselves).
Posted by: mhw   2006-09-22 10:05  

#8  we can release them. AFTER we've gotten Baghdad calmed down. The Sammarra bombing unleashed a genuine "cycle of violence" (unlike the so called cycle in Israel-Pal) that the Sadrist rode for all it was worth. IF we can break the cycle, the hope would be that Baghdad naturally calms down, and its not so easy to get the cycle started again. Which means you just need to hold the key Sadrists for a few months. Which Sadr knows - the implicit threat is that if sends his people to the mattresses against the Americans en masse, his people DONT get out in a few months. And maybe we go after him personally. Is it worth the risk? After all, if we win, and Iraq ends up a stable democracy, he probably still ends up a pol leader with enough following to get a cabinet seat and whatever perks accompany. If we lose, and civil war breaks out, while he stands a percentage of becoming El Jefe of Iraq, he also stands a percentage of becoming food for worms, at the hands of any other faction. So while he will push for civil war, he wants to keep open the other options, I think.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2006-09-22 09:52  

#7  AHMADINEJAD in the US. Then we pick up some of Sadr's men. Coincidence? I think not.
Posted by: plainslow   2006-09-22 08:32  

#6  I heard this last night, and thought there must be some significance to the fact that Tater's Tots are not rampaging, pilloring, plundering, rioting, and torching everthing in sight.

What's it all about (Alfie)?
Posted by: Bobby   2006-09-22 06:41  

#5  As long as it's not obvious! ;-)
Posted by: gorb   2006-09-22 02:39  

#4  gorb, you left out the part about them being dressed in brand new hand-tailored silk suits with their pockets stuffed full of C-notes and Cuban cigars.

PS: The drop-off crew is supposed to blow them kisses and wave vigorously while thanking them loudly for "their vital cooperation."
Posted by: Zenster   2006-09-22 02:02  

#3  If they do have to release them, or maybe they could just release them for the heck of it, they should drop them off in front of their houses in a limousine and send them on their way with a loud, heartfelt "Thank you and have a nice day!" and see if they show up for work the next day.
Posted by: gorb   2006-09-22 00:49  

#2  The boldness of these arrests indicates that the US can deal with any al-Sadr counter. Its time for the al-Mahdis to meet their maker.
Posted by: Snease Shaiting3550   2006-09-22 00:32  

#1  Sounds like the Sistani finally gave Tater up.

Unless it was Barzini all along...
Posted by: Fleasing Unomosh2048   2006-09-22 00:22  

00:00