You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Pelosi Statement on President BushÂ’s Speech at UN
2006-09-20
Washington, D.C. – House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi released the following statement today on President Bush’s speech at the United Nations in New York:

“It is one thing to give a speech about promoting peace, freedom, and democracy in broad, general terms as President Bush did at the United Nations today. It is another to commit to doing the hard work of diplomacy on a daily basis to resolve matters such as Iran’s nuclear ambitions, Syria’s support for Hezbollah, and the issues that divide Israelis and Palestinians.

“The President’s words need to be matched by sustained diplomatic engagement with our allies, and directly with our adversaries when necessary – not just when elections are near, but all the time. Mr. Bush’s rhetoric must be matched by policies that are well devised and competently implemented – unlike the policies that have made the United States less safe, such as the war in Iraq or the failure to finish the fight against terrorists in Afghanistan.”

Boy, that Pelosi sure is a smart one, getting her digs at Dubya in just ahead of Ahmedinejad and Assad.
Posted by:Steve White

#16  D'oh! wrong thread.....nevermind
Posted by: Frank G   2006-09-20 19:43  

#15  Yes, diplomatic engagement. Just like the brutally effective variety used in the Darfur thingy.
Posted by: Unumble Groque3948   2006-09-20 19:42  

#14  it would end up: he screwed three minks, stabbed 5 in the back, and lied to the rest, saying he would help free them for a fee.....
Posted by: Frank G   2006-09-20 19:42  

#13  Shhhhhhh, DD.

She's hoping no one will make the connection from her past verbal spews that she APPROVES OF and AGREES WITH both speeches.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2006-09-20 19:35  

#12  Her comments on Ahmanutjob's speech?
Her comments on Chavez's speech?


Still waiting.

Posted by: DoDo   2006-09-20 18:29  

#11  Shut your lying piehole, you cow.
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-09-20 11:29  

#10  There will be hell to pay for the speech writers who didnÂ’t insert the phrase “New Direction” into her prepared speech.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2006-09-20 11:04  

#9  Polls taken after her statement show Pelosi least likely to become Speaker of the House. She will, no doubt, retain the position of Nagging Bitch.
Posted by: wxjames   2006-09-20 09:53  

#8  "...sustained diplomatic engagement with our allies..."

What is with these people???? Just what do they think that the Euros have been doing with Iran for the last 3-4 years????

Like Chirac, Pelosi thinks sustained and infinite are synonyms. Shit or get off the pot seems to be an alien concept to them.
Posted by: AlanC   2006-09-20 09:16  

#7  Actually, for a Democrat, it's remarkably restrained. I'd half expected her to go full-DU on us and call for the Security Council to impose sanctions on mankind's real enemy, the Bushitler regime.
Posted by: Mike   2006-09-20 07:41  

#6  Yeah, Ahmadinejad is really open to diplomacy.
Posted by: Snease Shaiting3550   2006-09-20 07:24  

#5  So why not appoint Nancy as Ambassador to Iraq? Unless Jimmy wants it, of course.
Posted by: Bobby   2006-09-20 06:25  

#4  Sure thing, honey. It's real easy to do the "hard work of diplomacy on a daily basis" when the other side refuses to talk, walks out on talks, and just flat out lies.

And I thought Reid was the stupid one in the Democrat party....sheesh.
Posted by: Swamp Blondie   2006-09-20 05:52  

#3  Â“The PresidentÂ’s words need to be matched by sustained diplomatic engagement with our allies, and directly with our adversaries when necessary

Big clue: "[D]iplomatic engagement" does not fucking work, that is, unless you want to play an endless game of circle jerk. See Iran if you have any doubts. The only productive way of dealing "directly with our adversaries" has been to go in and kick their Islamic ass until it bleeds. Any questions?
Posted by: Zenster   2006-09-20 02:33  

#2  I'll bet she has a "plan", a "better way". All very non-specific, of course...

Except for that Iraq cut 'n run thing - they're sorta pat on the idea, just not on the timetable - each asshole has a different notion of when they'd like it to fail.

But all in all, undoubtedly all of the Dhimmi ideas are superior, just a bit fuzzy on the details, costs, and that logic stuff.

All Hail Speaker Pelosi! I can hardly wait nor contain myself!
Posted by: flyover   2006-09-20 01:10  

#1  If Pelosi spewed it, I can give you my reaction without even reading it:

Yadda yadda yadda.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2006-09-20 00:03  

00:00