Submit your comments on this article |
International-UN-NGOs |
NAM must be hard on terrorism: Singh |
2006-09-17 |
![]() At a summit that has been rife with sharp words on US policy Singh appealed for a new “inclusive globalisation”. He also argued that “as a group we have rejected extremes. We must spread the word of Gandhiji, the apostle of peace. Our voice must then be one of moderation, harmony and reason. If such is the voice of more than half of the people of the world, it will prevail.” |
Posted by:Fred |
#5 How did little Chavez and Immadinnerjacket swallow that ? Anyone regurgitate ? |
Posted by: SOP35/Rat 2006-09-17 11:46 |
#4 After NAM condemned the Indian nuclear tests in 1998, Indian leaders should have gotten a clue. How Manmohan Singh attempts to convince the biggest group of terrorist supporting states that they should condemn terrorism? They'll probably condemn "Indian state terrorism in Kashmir" after Pakistan sponsors the resolution. Many Indians are quite appalled that he, the duly elected leader of 1 billion people, should attend this summit of despots and shake the hand of Pervez Musharraf, just weeks after terror bombings sponsored by Pakistan. |
Posted by: john 2006-09-17 10:39 |
#3 “If NAM is to be relevant in today’s circumstances..." Translation: NAM is an geriatric leftover irrelevance of the Communist Eastern Block era. (It's now nakedly exposed as purely an anti American gang which it has always been since the Bandung Conference). Manmohan is trading with Israel. Wonder how long India should/could/would retain memebership with that sick gang? |
Posted by: Duh! 2006-09-17 06:16 |
#2 The delegates immediately agreed to condemn Israeli state terrorism. "That takes care of that," a spokesman said. |
Posted by: Baba Tutu 2006-09-17 03:15 |
#1 Fart meet wind |
Posted by: Captain America 2006-09-17 00:59 |