You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Marine Called Haditha Shootings Appropriate
2006-08-24
A sergeant who examined the scene hours after Marines killed two dozen Iraqis in Haditha last year said the shootings appeared to be an appropriate response to a coordinated insurgent attack, according to a sworn statement obtained by The Washington Post. Sgt. J.M. Laughner, part of a Marine human-intelligence exploitation team that was hunting down insurgent bombmakers, went from house to house in Haditha on Nov. 19, 2005, and acknowledged finding two dozen bodies, including some of women and small children.

But Laughner said the scenes of the slayings appeared to match the version of events the Marine squad provided that day and did not seem especially out of the ordinary, according to a transcript of Laughner's interview with military investigators in March. Laughner's account supports the argument made by some Marines in Kilo Company, 3rd Battalion, 1st Marines -- that they believed they were following their rules of engagement when they opened fire on groups of people inside at least three homes after a roadside bomb killed a member of their unit. Several Marines are under criminal investigation in connection with the civilian deaths that day, but no one has been charged.

Laughner's statement, although just one viewpoint, is further evidence that Marines who were on the ground that day viewed the civilian deaths as accidental rather than the result of a vengeful rampage.
Not the cold blooded massacre characterized Rep. John P. Murtha (D-Pa.) one week before he received any briefing by the Marine Corps.
Posted by:GK

#3  said the scenes of the slayings

Fair reporting except for calling it a slaying.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2006-08-24 12:58  

#2  considering the source it's a remarkably straight piece of reporting.
Posted by: RD   2006-08-24 07:23  

#1  The whole article still reeks of WaPo veiled indignation - "How could they?"

Somehow, tho, it seems to have a bit of balance.

Maybe Murtha neglected to renew his subscription?
Posted by: Bobby   2006-08-24 06:17  

00:00