You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Some Dems Want Lieberman Out of Party
2006-08-22
It's bad politics, it's bad dinner theater, and it's the Dhimmicrats. What more can you want?
HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) - Critics of Sen. Joe Lieberman's independent run to keep his job attacked on two fronts Monday, with one group asking an elections official to throw him out of the Democratic Party and a former rival calling on state officials to keep his name off the November ballot.

A group whose members described themselves as peace activists asked Sharon Ferrucci, New Haven's Democratic registrar of voters, to remove Lieberman from the party, arguing that he cannot be a Democrat while running under another party's banner. The request could lead to a hearing in which Lieberman, the Democrats' vice presidential nominee in 2000, would have to argue that he still adheres to the party's principles. "The law is pretty clear he is no longer a member of the Democratic Party in good standing," said group leader Henry Lowendorf. "There was an open vote and he was voted out. He joined a different party."
I'd actually enjoy being at that hearing.
Ferrucci said she would research the request, the first of its kind in her two decades on the job.
"Why me, Lord," she was heard to mutter.
Lieberman campaign manager Sherry Brown said the effort was "dirty political tricks at its worst." "This kind of ridiculous, partisan game-playing is not going to provide anyone in Connecticut with better jobs, better health care, or better schools," she said.
Nor will any of the candidates, but that's not the point.
Since losing the primary, Lieberman has referred to himself as an "independent Democrat" and said he plans to remain part of the Democratic caucus in Washington, even though several leading Democrats have called on him to give up his independent run.

As of Monday, about 4,600 of the 7,500 voters' signatures Lieberman collected to petition his way onto the November ballot had been verified, and Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz said she expects Lieberman will ultimately have enough.

Lamont distanced himself Monday from the peace activists' request. He told reporters that Lieberman should not be removed from the Democratic rolls, and that Lieberman has the right under state law to form the new party. "He's got the right to run. It's not what I would have done," Lamont said.
Thanks for that insight, Mr. Historical-Footnote-for-2006.
John Orman, a Democrat who gave up a challenge to Lieberman last year, argued in complaints filed with the state Monday that Lieberman should be kept off the Nov. 7 ballot. Orman, a Fairfield University political science professor, accused Lieberman of creating "a fake political party," adding: "He's doing anything he can to get his name on the ballot."

Campaign spokesman Dan Gerstein said Lieberman has followed the law in his re-election effort.
Posted by:Steve White

#13  It is possible that if Joe loses Bush might find a place for him. Sec Defence is not likely though.

More likely is Joe wins and he finds himself as the deciding vote, or close to it, in a fairly evenly divided Senate and he finds he has a real opportunity to stick it to some folks that went after him.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2006-08-22 16:20  

#12  Democraps are so stupid, they actually think Independent is a political party.
Posted by: wxjames   2006-08-22 15:25  

#11  Well put AC, well put.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2006-08-22 13:16  

#10  Party purges have begun! Pass the popcorn.

Note to those desperate rational holdouts of the Donks. Even Hitler turned on Ernst Roehm and the SA, and Mao on his Red Guard, cause they knew, they were threat to their power. You created these creatures by not expelling them when it was easy, but your own lust for power blinded you and still blinds you to the destruction you've planted. Why do I get the image of Hindenburg and von Papen thinking they could control Mr. Hitler by bringing him into the government?
Posted by: Angaviger Craiter1890   2006-08-22 12:50  

#9  Uh-oh, I think the DU is finally on to Rove.
Posted by: Broadhead6   2006-08-22 12:42  

#8  If I were Joe, that would be my plan, but then I am a vindictive person and that what be vengence. Other than his his run as VP I don't see what he owes the Dems now.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2006-08-22 12:03  

#7  . . . a conspiracy that Joe will win, Bush will appoint him SecDef, he resigns his seat, and then the Republican Gov gets to appoint a Republican to replace him.

How'd they find out?!
Posted by: The Doctor   2006-08-22 11:52  

#6  ... a conspiracy that Joe will win, Bush will appoint him SecDef, he resigns his seat, and then the Republican Gov gets to appoint a Republican to replace him.

Ain't a half bad outcome, if you ask me.
Posted by: badanov   2006-08-22 11:01  

#5  It gets better! Over at DU (yuck) they are floating a conspiracy that Joe will win, Bush will appoint him SecDef, he resigns his seat, and then the Republican Gov gets to appoint a Republican to replace him. They have way too much time on their hands.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2006-08-22 10:27  

#4  Man, I don't even like Lieberman, but I'm going to be laughing my ass off when he beats Lamont in November.
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-08-22 08:57  

#3  I read somewhere, I guy was saying that the GOP would lose elections if the Democrats would just shut-up for 5 minutes. :)
Posted by: djohn66   2006-08-22 08:09  

#2  Hmmm. Is this a purge or a quagmire? Guess the "peace activists" should have thought of an exit strategy. ;)
Posted by: Swamp Blondie   2006-08-22 06:57  

#1  I was so annoyed with the GOP's inattention to our borders and excessive spending I was going to sit out '06. My thanks to the new 'mainstream' in the Democratic party for previewing the alternative. I don't trust the Ned Lamont wing of the Democrats to deal with Iran. I'll be at the polls in November.
Posted by: DMFD   2006-08-22 03:02  

00:00