You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Annan: UN won't 'wage war' in Lebanon
2006-08-20
Secretary-General Kofi Annan appealed to UN member states to provide desperately needed UN peacekeeping troops for Lebanon and assured them the UN force would not "wage war" on Israel, Lebanon or Hizbullah. "It is not expected to achieve by force what must be realized through negotiation and an internal Lebanese consensus," Annan said in a report to the UN Security Council on implementation of the Aug. 11 resolution calling for an end to the Israeli-Hizbullah conflict.

A key concern of many countries is whether the UN force will be called on to disarm Hizbullah fighters, as called for in a September 2004 UN resolution. They want to study the rules of engagement and concept of operations for the force, which were distributed Friday, before making a decision on troops. Deputy Secretary-General Mark Malloch Brown said countries needed to understand that the force would not be offensive. "It's not going to go in there and attempt large-scale disarmament," he said.

He appealed to European countries to contribute troops to an expanded UN force to balance the commitments from Muslim countries so that both Israel and Lebanon will view the troops as legitimate.
Posted by:Fred

#10  UN won't 'wage war' in Lebanon

As if they have ever done so in the past. This is just Annan's not-so-discreet signal to the terrorists that the UN's anti-Semitic policy remains unchanged.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-08-20 21:51  

#9  We wage war on Israel in general assembly---not in Lebanon where they might shoot back.
Posted by: gromgoru   2006-08-20 19:34  

#8  The UN NEVER wages war.

But don't worry, asshole - the Hezzies will.

And so will Israel. And the next time, they won't stop.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2006-08-20 14:24  

#7  They may not 'wage war' but I'll bet dollars to donuts that they will provide operational and logistical support -- to Hizbollah.

It isn't as if they haven't done it before.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2006-08-20 13:34  

#6  Way I saw it, Olmert had screwed it up badly and we stepped in to give Israel breathing room and an out before they really were bogged down in a quasi-occuaption they had no heart for and couldn't sustain.

But the data we all have sure are ambiguous ....
Posted by: lotp   2006-08-20 13:03  

#5  Does anyone else feel like we finally fell in with the rest of the world to hamstring Israel on this?
We started out on the right side, and by the time it was over, we were right there up front trying to get Israel to quit before their work was through. Now, there has to be another war. Hezbollah will only be bolder and more aggressive since they think(and I really think they believe this shit) that they won the war and drove Israel out of their shithole country.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-08-20 12:57  

#4  UN human shields for Hizbullah to hide behind.
Posted by: Darrell   2006-08-20 11:45  

#3  Further translation - ROE = You are observers and reporters, you will not exchange fire with anyone. If you come under fired and cannot self extract, you will seek refuge and call the command post for extraction.
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-08-20 07:02  

#2  Oh, and BTW, that finger reminded me of something.
Posted by: gorb   2006-08-20 00:26  

#1  A key concern of many countries is whether the UN force will be called on to disarm Hizbullah fighters, as called for in a September 2004 UN resolution. They want to study the rules of engagement and concept of operations for the force, which were distributed Friday, before making a decision on troops.

Read: The UN is not planning on actually doing anything like what it set out to do. The ol' "bait and switch" ploy, it seems. Would you trust these guys with your future?
Posted by: gorb   2006-08-20 00:21  

00:00