| Submit your comments on this article |
| Fifth Column |
| NYT: Save the Endangered Whistle-Blower |
| 2006-08-19 |
| Well, well. Looks like the recent ruling that makes the receivers of classified intel legally prosecutable has hit home... If ever government whistle-blowers needed protection from official retaliation it is now, in the secrecy-obsessed Bush administration. Federal employees daring to disclose fraud and abuse in their bureaucracies have been under virtual siege, isolated as pariahs and shipped off under gag orders to lesser jobs in far-off places. Appeals to court review under the 17-year-old Whistle-Blower Protection Act have proved fruitless, with the Supreme Court ruling in May that workers have no right to First Amendment protection when they warn lawmakers and taxpayers of government waste and folly. The ruling has thrown the issue back into the lap of Congress. Fortunately, there is enough anger emerging on both sides of the aisle to raise hopes for remedial legislation. |
| Posted by:Uleresh Cheater1151 |
| #1 Hmmm...isn't it a basic principle in most local American laws, that possession of stolen property is a crime? And particularly in a case where one knows that it is indeed received not by legal means? |
| Posted by: Crush Spaising9877 2006-08-19 10:12 |