You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Beirut dismisses UN draft resolution
2006-08-06
Lebanon has rejected a draft UN resolution proposed by the US and France that calls for "full cessation of hostilities" between Israel and Hezbollah. Nouhad Mahmoud, a Lebanese foreign ministry official, said on Sunday that the government "would have liked to see our concerns more reflected in the text" of the draft resolution.
“...the government "would have liked to see our concerns more reflected in the text...”
"Unfortunately, it lacked, for instance, a call for the withdrawal of Israeli forces which are now in Lebanon. That is a recipe for more confrontation." He said the government was also unhappy that the resolution does not call for the Shebaa Farms area to be put under UN control, as Lebanon has asked, while its future status is figured out.

The UN draft resolution was released on Saturday after Washington and Paris reached an agreement on the document's details. Mahmoud said Lebanon had proposed some amendments to make the draft more acceptable to Beirut. "It must address the concerns of the Lebanese people. Otherwise it won't fly," he said. He added that Beirut remained committed to the seven-point plan adopted last month by its cabinet, which includes Hezbollah ministers. The plan calls for an immediate ceasefire, the withdrawal of Israeli forces from southern Lebanon, the return of Lebanese people driven from their homes by the fighting and the deployment of UN and Lebanese forces in the south, along with the disarmament of Hezbollah.

Speaking after a cabinet meeting held to discuss the document, Ghazi Aridi, the Lebanese information minister, said:
“None of us will give up anything to do with national sovereignty, rights, dignity™...”
"Even this draft is not final ... we will not discuss the intentions of this side or that. None of us will give up anything to do with national sovereignty, rights, dignity," he said, affirming the government was committed "to Lebanon's territory, Lebanon's liberation, the withdrawal of the occupation from Lebanese land".

Mohammed Fneish, one of two Hezbollah cabinet ministers, said: "We [will] abide by it on condition that no Israeli soldier remains inside Lebanese land. If they stay, we will not abide by it."

“We will abide by it on condition that no Israeli soldier remains inside Lebanese land. If they stay, we will not abide by it...”
John Bolton, the US ambassador to the UN, said the draft was the start, not the end. "This is not a resolution that provides the comprehensive solution. I'm sure there are aspects of it that are displeasing to almost everyone but the point is this is a way to get started and that's what we hope to do."

An Israeli cabinet minister said the draft resolution put pressure on his country to complete its military operation quickly. "We have the coming days for lots of military moves. But we have to realise the timetable is getting shorter," said Isaac Herzog, the tourism minister and a member of the security cabinet. "It is a fact that we have to accept and act in accordance with," he said on Israeli Channel 1 television.

“... a full cessation of hostilities based upon, in particular, the immediate cessation by Hezbollah of all attacks and the immediate cessation by Israel of all offensive military operations...”
The draft resolution's central demand is for "a full cessation of hostilities based upon, in particular, the immediate cessation by Hezbollah of all attacks and the immediate cessation by Israel of all offensive military operations". The document charts a detailed path for the two sides to follow to achieve a lasting peace, envisioning a second resolution in a week or two that would authorise an international military force for southern Lebanon. Among those steps would be the creation of a large buffer zone in southern Lebanon free of both Israeli troops and Hezbollah fighters, monitored by the Lebanese army and international peacekeepers. But it sets no timetable for the withdrawal of thousands of Israeli troops that have moved into southern Lebanon in recent days.

Nassir al-Nasser, Qatar's ambassador to the UN, the Security Council's only Arab member, said: "If we call for cessation of hostilities, then what after that? The Israeli forces are on the territory of Lebanon. They should go back."

“The draft also called for Hezbollah to be disarmed and for Lebanon's borders to be solidified, especially in the disputed Shebaa Farms area...”
The draft also called for Hezbollah to be disarmed and for Lebanon's borders to be solidified, especially in the disputed Shebaa Farms area, occupied by Israel since 1967. Another element was an arms embargo that would block any entity in Lebanon except the national government from obtaining weapons from abroad. That was aimed at blocking the sale or supply of arms to Hezbollah from Iran and Syria, which are believed to be the group's main backers. The resolution would put significant pressure on Lebanon's government, which ceded control of the south to Hezbollah.

A vote on the resolution is expected within the next few days. Some political analysts said the UN initiative would be difficult to put into practice. "There's going to be a huge gap between the content of this resolution and the military and psychological reality on the ground [which] will make it hard to implement," said Shibley Telhami, a Middle East expert at the Brookings Institution in Washington. Telhami said one problem was that Hezbollah has not been involved with drafting the resolution. "It isn't clear that they (Hezbollah) have any input in this, and it's hard to see how you're going to implement something like this [without it]."
Posted by:Fred

#22  Over at the Counterterrorism blog, Walid Phares is saying that REUTERS IS HIJACKING LEBANON'S ANSWER TO THE UN
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2006-08-06 22:03  

#21  John Bolton, the US ambassador to the UN, said the draft was the start, not the end

I've got to take the kids to camp. I think I'm going to have some important family matter to attend to. I haven't taken any vacation and need some time off. I'll see you in a couple of weeks. Talk amongst yourselves while I'm gone. Thanks. Sincerely, John Bolton
Posted by: JohnQC   2006-08-06 17:52  

#20  Looks like it might come to that OP. There's 2 things we can do, solve the problem now or pass it down to the next guy. What do you thing W ? What do you think Olmert ? Solve or pass ?
Posted by: wxjames   2006-08-06 17:06  

#19  I'm sure three or four ARCLIGHT strikes down through the center of Beirut would convince them to sign ANYTHING, just to get them to stop. We don't fight wars, we play games. I'm disgusted. Nuke Tehran, nuke Qom, and nuke Damascus. Run ARCLIGHT strikes down through the center of the Bekaa valley until it's nothing but ground sand. Screw Baalbek and its "roman ruins" - it's just another hiding place for arab perfidity. Eliminate Tyre and Sidon. Show these idiots what real war means, and make them wet themselves just for thinking about it. George Patton is spinning at 70,000rpm.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2006-08-06 15:58  

#18  Perhaps we should get someone in Brussels to file a law suit.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-08-06 15:34  

#17  Technically, it makes sense that the Lebanese government should be, gorb. After all, Hizb'allah is the largest single party inside the government, even controlling two cabinet ministries. And, the Lebanese government has not only never openly disavowed Hizb'allah antics, but has said the Army will back them if necessary and in another article the PM is looking for Pakistani troops to fight for the Fatherland.
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-08-06 15:23  

#16  Lebanon is signatory to the Geneva Conventions. Does that mean they are responsible for Hezb'Allah's war crimes? As far as I am concerned, they are because they aren't doing anything meaningful to control Hezb'Allah. Perhaps this ought to be factored into their rejecting this resolution.
Posted by: gorb   2006-08-06 14:00  

#15  I was watching some of the UN resolution blather on Fox. What a bunch of crap. I remember in, what was it, 1958, when Eisenhower sent in troops to Lebanon, the UN Lebanese rep was going on and on with the same blather. The problem is that the UNies will not admit that these terrorists are terrorists. Good and evil. These countries try negotiating with murderers. It is truly a mad hatter's tea party. I could not stand it any more and watched a show about making an aircraft carrier.....and I felt a whole lot better.
Posted by: Alaska Paul in Hooper Bay, AK   2006-08-06 12:53  

#14  Hey Mahmoud! Shebaa Farms is Syrian by UN order, asshole. They just lost it along with the Golan. Don't start wars you can't win is the message, that's why Assad lets your country take the beating. Proxy loser!
Posted by: Frank G   2006-08-06 09:10  

#13  None of us will give up anything to do with national sovereignty, rights, dignity," he said, affirming the government was committed "to Lebanon's territory, Lebanon's liberation, the withdrawal of the occupation from Lebanese land".

Lebanon has already given up sovereignty, dignity and rights to Hezb. They've given up the country to terrorists.

Israel is in the process of liberating you from terrorist control. Wanna take the blinders off and lend a hand?
Posted by: Thinemp Whimble2412   2006-08-06 09:04  

#12  sorry, it posted out of context.

#9 Scrub down Lebanon and start over
#11 Being done as we speak.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2006-08-06 08:58  

#11  Being done as we speak.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2006-08-06 08:56  

#10  Just don't forget to send in the archeologists to restore the historic bits, after. Mankind's heritage, and all that -- and Israel has some of the world's best archeologists for the key periods. Who know? They may find more evidence of the House of David, especially the key, semi-mythical Solomonic Period. ;-)
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-08-06 08:53  

#9  Scrub down Lebanon and start over
Posted by: Captain America   2006-08-06 07:03  

#8  Muzzies keep DEMANDING, they never take responsibility for any mess of their own making.
Posted by: Duh!   2006-08-06 04:41  

#7  This is shaping up to be a major defreat for Hizbollocks, Iran and Syria. We may well see Hizb substantially disarmed. Much humiliation and seething to precede and follow.
Posted by: phil_b   2006-08-06 02:34  

#6  Telhami said one problem was that Hezbollah has not been involved with drafting the resolution. "It isn't clear that they (Hezbollah) have any input in this, and it's hard to see how you're going to implement something like this [without it]."

Normal people don't discuss with terrorists: they kill them. That's the only treatment for this plague.
Posted by: leroidavid   2006-08-06 01:37  

#5  The resolution was rejected? Darn the luck. Better go back and start all over again..and invite the Ambassador from Chad and Pago Pago.

Im sure they will have a lot to contribute!
Posted by: Oldcat   2006-08-06 01:34  

#4  The Lebanese just broke the world record of pretentiousness...
Posted by: leroidavid   2006-08-06 01:33  

#3  The Lebanese government thinks it can make demands -- instead of apologizing for letting a bunch of terrorists use their land to attack Israel. Maybe more destruction is what they need.

I predict no resolution passed in the next 10 days. Not saying one will be passed on the 11th day either...
Posted by: Kalle (kafir forever)   2006-08-06 01:29  

#2  Inshallah Joe, inshallah.
Posted by: Seafarious   2006-08-06 01:16  

#1  IOW, the Lebbies demand, Demand, DEMAND, D-E-M-A-N-D to be Iranians, Shias, repressed and regresssed and anti-democratic in the name of God.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-08-06 01:13  

00:00