You have commented 340 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Senate race tight in red-and-blue Minnesota
2006-07-31
The battle for Minnesota's open U.S. Senate seat is turning into one of the closer races of the 2006 election season in a state once ruled by Democrats but trending Republican in recent years. Even Minnesota's Democratic state chairman, Brian Melendez, told The Washington Times that "this state is about evenly divided between Republicans and Democrats. It has become more conservative-leaning in recent years. It's not a state that either party can take for granted."

A little more than three months before Election Day, independent voter polls show Republican Rep. Mark Kennedy trailing Democratic Hennepin County Attorney Amy Klobuchar by five percentage points in a contest for the seat held by retiring Sen. Mark Dayton, a Democrat. Mr. Kennedy calls Mr. Dayton "a fringe liberal who got nothing done and wasted the Senate seat for six years." A SurveyUSA election poll of 700 Minnesotans showed Ms. Klobuchar leading Mr. Kennedy 47 percent to 42 percent. Independence Party candidate Robert Fitzgerald, who could be the spoiler in the race, drew 8 percent. The poll, conducted last week for several statewide television stations, has a margin of error of four percentage points.

Earlier this month, the Minneapolis Star Tribune published its Minnesota Poll showing Ms. Klobuchar with a 19-point lead. The Kennedy campaign said the poll has a notorious history of being "skewed against Republicans." Mr. Kennedy, who is in his third term in the House, is attacking Ms. Klobuchar as someone far to the left of Minnesota's political mainstream. He said he will be an independent voice in the Senate, citing his vote against President Bush's proposal to drill for oil in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and his opposition to the president's No Child Left Behind education act.
Posted by:Fred

#3  A single program can cost billons. So maybe with housing values (property values) increasing and he wacked a few billion dollar line items - it's not that hard to believe. If you remove the corrupt fingers out of medicare, roads, govt, education, etc. contracts - it could easily save billions.
Posted by: Shush Sholuth7794   2006-07-31 13:19  

#2  "Mr. Pawlenty turned a $4.5 billion deficit into a $1 billion surplus without raising taxes."

Yeah riiiight! I guess if your willing to believe "It's not a Tax it's a Fee".
Posted by: DepotGuy   2006-07-31 11:17  

#1  I question if these states have become "more" conservative. I doubt that is true. They may have become more "republican" - but that probably has less to do with changing attitudes than it does with the fact that the Democratic party is run by a bunch of wacked out moonbats with ideas that sound like they came from the insane asylum. Whipping up your base to hate Bush is not a party platform.
Posted by: 2b   2006-07-31 10:25  

00:00