You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
U.S. guaranteeing security of aggressor
2006-07-27
(MNA) -- Although two weeks have passed since the Israeli army began its military attack on Lebanon, all diplomatic measures to force the Zionists to put an end to the bombardment of innocent civilians seem to have been in vain. The foreign ministers of Germany and France, the U.S. secretary of state and the United Nations deputy secretary general have failed to convince Israel to accept an immediate ceasefire.

U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, who had held meetings with both the Lebanese and Israeli officials during her recent Middle East tour, believes that it is still too soon to discuss a ceasefire. Rice, who has not proposed any peace plan for solving the current crisis in the Middle East, announced that the United States wants Hezbollah forces to be disarmed, to be followed by the deployment of NATO forces between the border region of the occupied territories of Palestine and the Litani river -- about 20 kilometers from the frontier -- so that Hezbollah forces will be unable to fire missiles into the occupied territories in the future.

Undoubtedly, the Lebanese government and political groups will never agree with such a proposal because the deployment of NATO forces would be a violation of Lebanon's sovereignty and territorial integrity. The recent proposal is not meant to guarantee peace and stability in the region, but is actually a prologue for realizing the Greater Middle East Initiative, which the U.S. has long sought to implement. Naturally, regional nations and particularly the Lebanese nation will never allow the U.S., the European Union, and the Zionist regime to turn Lebanon into a base for plots against other countries.
Posted by:Fred

#3  I remember reading some tales by a Soviet spy about how he was in the Army in USSR in '67 trying to follow the 6 day war on Russian radio and they knew the jig was up for the Egyptians when the radio started calling the IDF 'the aggressors'
Posted by: Oldcat   2006-07-27 22:54  

#2  Usually when they talk about the "aggressor" it means we are winning
Posted by: Captain America   2006-07-27 17:35  

#1  Yes, it is too soon to discuss a ceasefire. There's still Hezbullies walking around. Kill 'em all first.
Posted by: Swamp Blondie   2006-07-27 05:58  

00:00