You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
Bombing Bolton
2006-07-17
By Cliff Kincaid
The July-August issue of Foreign Policy magazine has an article, "How to Defuse the Bolton Bomb," attacking U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. John Bolton. It is written by Barbara Crossette, identified as U.N. bureau chief for the New York Times from 1994-2001 and now "a consulting editor at the United Nations Association of the United States." The latter is a main component of the pro-U.N. lobby.

But the Times affiliation is what is most interesting. Here we have a case of a former reporter and bureau chief for the Times who covered the United Nations and now works for the pro-U.N. lobby and has put her name on an article attacking America's Ambassador to the world body. This is an example of the "revolving door" between politics and journalism. One has to be a fool to suppose that Crossette's left-wing bias only emerged after she left the employ of the Times. Her work for the U.N. Association demonstrates that left-wing reporters covering the U.N. will always have a home in the U.N. lobby after they leave journalism.

Before going to work for the U.N. Association, she worked for something called U.N. Wire, funded by U.N. sugar daddy Ted Turner.

The piece is laughable. "As is his right," she says, "Bolton has replaced staffers at the mission in New York with loyalists and true believers." She cites only one, Richard "Terry" Miller, who had been added to the Bolton team at the U.S. Mission. Crossette neglects to mention that Peggy Kerry, John Kerry's equally liberal sister, is still at the U.S. Mission to the U.N., where she handles relations with left-wing non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Bolton can't replace her-or most of the staff up there-because they are considered career civil servants.
Posted by:ryuge

#3  We've been easing off of UN reform because we have two difficult projects before the UNSC right now. But it is just the timeout between rounds. We have already made ourselves clear to Kofi, and within the last few weeks have been joined by Japan, also a sizeable contributor, that also is demanding reforms.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-07-17 10:39  

#2  You know, I think Bush should yank her and all of the intel heads out of their chairs and take them to Camp David for a week - let 'em get away from the agency sluts and get their heads straight, again. Maybe bring in a cult deprogrammer or two, LOL. Then get back in there and kick some serious ass. Posted by: flyover 2006-07-17 05:02

Cirtification of "cult deprogramming" should be mandetory before any of those donks can enter the State cafeteria or executive dining room. What a bunch of brokeback, swishing wing nuts. No wonder General Powell would rather work on his Volvo than discuss his tenure at State.

Posted by: Besoeker   2006-07-17 05:12  

#1  Those bitching and moaning are perfect contraindicators. Bolton's doing a righteous job. I'll start to worry if they stop squealing.

As for Rice, I suspect there's truth in the worry that Rice has been listening to the jaded bitches at State - and is losing her perspective.

You know, I think Bush should yank her and all of the intel heads out of their chairs and take them to Camp David for a week - let 'em get away from the agency sluts and get their heads straight, again. Maybe bring in a cult deprogrammer or two, LOL. Then get back in there and kick some serious ass.
Posted by: flyover   2006-07-17 05:02  

00:00