You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Liberals angry at Boxer for supporting Lieberman
2006-07-17
Liberal activists, including some California Democrats, are furious with Sen. Barbara Boxer -- a leading critic of the Iraq war -- for her active support of Sen. Joe Lieberman, a Democrat who staunchly defends the war in Iraq. Lieberman is fighting for his political life in Connecticut, facing an anti-war opponent, cable magnate Ned Lamont, in an Aug. 8 Senate primary. Lieberman, his party's nominee for vice president in 2000, has already announced he will run as an independent in the fall if he loses the primary.

That decision has divided his Senate colleagues and Democrats nationwide. And the Lieberman race has ignited a fiery debate among Democrats, now raging on political blogs, about loyalty, political principles and whether the three-term senator has betrayed his party and should be tossed out. Boxer, a California Democrat, said she decided to support Lieberman, and campaign for him in Connecticut, even though ``we have no common ground surrounding the issue of the Iraq war.'' Lieberman has been one of her ``staunchest allies'' on the environment and reproductive rights, two issues very important to her, Boxer said in a statement. ``I will be campaigning with him to let the voters know about his record on those issues.''
Posted by:Fred

#12  I don't know which is worse when I read the word "Babs," BB or BS (Streisand). "Yooooouuuuu are the wind beneath my wings....."

Speakin' of wings, did you guyz hear that Hooters' founder's titzup? Sorry, borrowed that one from the rants over at that story, but I couldn't resist.
Posted by: BA   2006-07-17 20:39  

#11  Yeah, if Babs is to conservative for them....whew!
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-07-17 19:50  

#10  What, Babs is to "right-wing" for 'em?

These folks are insane. Literally.
Posted by: mojo   2006-07-17 15:37  

#9  Yeah, but they don't eat each other like the Donks.
Those dudes are vicious.
Posted by: Unailing Snomoper3176   2006-07-17 14:52  

#8  It's sort of like Republicans on balancing the budget, abortion or domestic evesdropping.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-07-17 11:07  

#7  How can any Dem win anything when their party is divided in half over 3 different issues? You can't be pro-war and anti-war at the same time, one half of them won't vote for you if you are in the other camp. I don't get it.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-07-17 11:06  

#6  I thought these were the people who said their differing viewpoints and open course of debate made them stronger? That it was the source of their strength?

That was them, wasn't it?
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-07-17 11:04  

#5  Ahh, nothing like a good old fashioned party purge to get the nutroots all worked up!
Posted by: Swamp Blondie   2006-07-17 07:54  

#4  Horse thief, attorney, rapper gangster, "cable magnate".... same, same. We'll have to blame George Bush if she or Lieberman switch parties.
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-07-17 04:11  

#3  Attacking conservatives not seen as PC, so they turn on themselves instead.
Posted by: gorb   2006-07-17 01:29  

#2  Interesting (and telling) that the current 'litmus test' for Donks is repudiation of national survival. The Dems are headed toward self-immolation. I just hope they don't take the rest of us with them.
Posted by: PBMcL   2006-07-17 00:50  

#1  Watchin' BB cry reminds me of what's right in this world
Posted by: Captain America   2006-07-17 00:41  

00:00