You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iranian National Security Advisor in Damascus
2006-07-12
DEBKAfile reports: IranÂ’s national security adviser Ali Larijani flies to Damascus aboad special military plane Wednesday night as war tension builds up around Hizballah kidnap of 2 Israeli soldiers. Larijani is also IranÂ’s senior nuclear negotiator. He will remain in Damascus for the duration of the crisis in line with the recently Iranian-Syrian mutual defense pact. His presence affirms that an Israeli attack on Syria will be deemed an assault on Iran.
Kind of like a Austria-Hungary attack on Serbia was deemed an assault on Russia. And we all know how that worked out.
It also links the Israeli hostage crisis to IranÂ’s nuclear standoff with the West. The White House released a statement holding Syria and Iran responsible for Hizballah abduction and demanding their immediate and unconditional release.
So, we're playing the part of.....Germany? Better dust off the von Schlieffen Plan, Herr Rumsfeld
The Syrian army has been put on a state of preparedness.
And Belgium Lebanon is nervous.

DEBKAfileÂ’s military sources add that the Iranian air force, missile units and navy are also on high alert.
Mobilization starts, trains begin to roll, I've seen this movie.

DEBKAfileÂ’s counter-terror sources report Hizballah acted on orders from Tehran to open a second front against Israel, partly to ease IDF military pressure on the Hamas in the Gaza Strip. This was in response to an appeal Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal made to the Iranian ambassador to Damascus Mohammad Hassan Akhtari Sunday, July 9.

DEBKAfileÂ’s Iranian sources report TehranÂ’s rationale as composed of three parts:

1. Iran shows the flag as a champion and defender of its ally, Hamas.

2. Sending Hizballah to open a warfront against Israel is the logical tactical complement to its latest order to go into action against American and British forces in southern Iraq.

3. Tehran hopes to hijack the agenda before the G-8 summit opening in St. Petersberg, Russia on July 15. Instead of discussing IranÂ’s nuclear case and the situation in Iraq along the lines set by President George W. Bush, the leaders of the industrial nations will be forced to address the Middle East flare-up.
Following in the long tradition of starting a war to avoid solving a problem at home

Any Israeli decision taken at prime minister Ehud OlmertÂ’s high level consultation in Jerusalem Wednesday night must take this turn of events into account before deciding on limited air strikes against Hizballah and Lebanese civil targets without delay.

Our sources also report that immediately after NasrallahÂ’s statement to the media, HizballahÂ’s leaders went into hiding, their bases were evacuated and their fighting strength transferred to pre-planned places of concealment. Ahead of the abduction, Hizballah ordnance and missile stocks were transferred to the Palestinian Ahmed JibrilÂ’s tunnel system at Naama, 30 km south of Beirut, which was built in the 1980s by East German engineers.
Manning the Maginot Line, so to speak.
The Israel navy has long tried to smash this coastal underground fortress from the sea without success.

Israel began calling up an armored division, air crews and technicians from the reserves Wednesday night.
Can you say, Blitzkrieg?
DEBKAfileÂ’s military experts: If IsraelÂ’s leaders opt for an anti-Hizballah operation on the lines of Operation Summer Rain against Hamas in the Gaza Strip, the IDF can expect the same measure of success as it has had in recovering Gilead Shalit and ending the Qassam missiles barrage.
Posted by:Steve

#20  Israel has ALWAYS kicked butt in battle. Out come has always been way lop sided in favor of Israel.

Syrai and Iran had better realize, they do not need the wrath of Israel to break out upon their asses.
Posted by: Chulet Thruling5126   2006-07-12 22:45  

#19  Once again Iran has manufactured a diversion to keep attention focused away from its nuclear program. Because Ali Larijani will be 'pre-occupied' with the 'crisis' and because he is the one who is to respond to the nuclear package I can see the Iranians with Russian and Chinese help delaying a resolution for at least a month.
Posted by: DanNY   2006-07-12 22:36  

#18  Glenmore's thinking along the same lines as I've been. We don't know what was in those trucks, but I can guess what the Iranians and Syrians WANT it to have been.

Special Mahdi days coming up in a few weeks, too.
Posted by: lotp   2006-07-12 20:52  

#17  But who would the phrench surrender to?

les Beurs.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-07-12 20:03  

#16  I wonder what 6 thinks?
I blame Princip the Joooooooooooooooo!

Not a clue really. Maybe re-establish a temporary IDF presence south of the Litani. Who knows.
Posted by: 6   2006-07-12 19:46  

#15  "Iranian National Security Advisor in Damascus"
One word: TARGET.
At this point it wouldn't surprise me if he takes the two kidnaped Israeli soldiers back to Iran as human shields for his centrifuges.
Posted by: Darrell   2006-07-12 19:37  

#14  What was in the trucks that left Iraq for Syria ahead of the invasion? Where is it now? What does Iran mean when it warns Israel of 'devastating attack from afar'? Is that the sharia-required 'warning'?
This is a set-up that has been waiting some time for a 'trigger' - it is hard to miss the similarities between the assassination of 'one man' by an 'unaccountable' foe in 1914 and the kidnapping in a similar situation in Gaza. Triggers that lead to essentially pre-ordained catastrophe - for one or both sides. I fear there may be no good way out.
Posted by: Glenmore   2006-07-12 19:15  

#13  The trip was planned before the kidnapping. I smell a link.

Rantburg posters aren't happy with IDF operations in Gaza. They could find the rockets, and Hamas and al-JIhad safe houses, etc by using strategic detentions. Seize 100 Palestinians, and at least one will be fed up enough with the leadership, to start pointing fingers. Would that be kidnapping? Not under US law; investigative detentions are legal (Terry v Ohio) as long as the person is held only during investigation. Internationally, short duration custody would probably be acceptable.

I know its frustrating to hold territory where offensive weapons are stashed, while not being allowed to conduct effective searches.

As I have mentioned in other posts, Ahmadinejad has been holding mass anti-Israel rallies all over Iran. Something is in the air.
Posted by: Anginens Threreng8133   2006-07-12 18:37  

#12  I wonder what 6 thinks?
Posted by: 3 legged yeller dawg   2006-07-12 18:30  

#11  Is anyone else thinking 6-day war here?

I'm thinking it should be a 6-hour war.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2006-07-12 18:15  

#10  But who would the phrench surrender to?
Posted by: Brett   2006-07-12 18:09  

#9  I'm thinking 6 year.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-07-12 17:52  

#8  Syria comes to the "rescue" to "defend" Lebanon

So if Lebanon is playing the part of Belgium, will France play itself?
Posted by: Steve   2006-07-12 17:47  

#7  Is anyone else thinking 6-day war here?
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-07-12 17:43  

#6  Nah, I think this is part of a Syrian plan to re-occupy Lebanon. They have Hezbollah precipitate the Israeli action and then Syria comes to the "rescue" to "defend" Lebanon from an Isreali action that Syria itself precipitated in order to justify that re-occupation.

Hey, don't make fun, I am proud of my cynicism.
Posted by: crosspatch   2006-07-12 17:35  

#5  Hezbollah was conceived in 1982 by a group of Muslim clerics after the Israeli invasion of Lebanon. It was close to a contingent of some 2000 Iranian Revolutionary guards, based in Lebanon's Bekaa Valley, which had been sent to the country to aid the resistance against Israel.

In 1983, militants who went on to join Hezbollah ranks carried out a suicide bombing attack that killed 241 US marines in Beirut.
Posted by: Jesing Ebbease3087   2006-07-12 17:35  

#4  Kill him.
Posted by: mojo   2006-07-12 17:25  

#3   THE GUNS OF AUGUST JULY

28 July 1914 : Austria-Hungary declares war on Serbia, begins firing on Serbian territory.
Posted by: Steve   2006-07-12 17:19  

#2  THE GUNS OF AUGUST JULY
Posted by: Lancasters Over Dresden   2006-07-12 16:47  

#1  Sigh, third in line. That's what I get for being creative.
Posted by: Steve   2006-07-12 16:36  

00:00