You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Indicted DeLay must stay on November ballot
2006-07-06
HOUSTON (Reuters) - Former House Republican Leader Tom DeLay, indicted in Texas on campaign-finance related charges, must stay on the ballot in November's congressional elections despite withdrawing from the race, a federal judge ruled on Thursday. A local Republican Party official said the ruling by a U.S. court judge in Austin, Texas, would be appealed within 30 days. "Ultimately, everyone knows the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals will be the final arbiter of this," said Harris County Republican Party Chairman Jared Woodfill.

DeLay was forced to resign as majority leader last year after being indicted in Texas. Hurt by the criminal charges as well as an expanding scandal involving disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff, he dropped his re-election bid when he faced a strong Democratic challenger. A Republican backbencher who rose to power as a conservative leader in the House, he resigned from Congress on June 9 to give Republican Party officials time to replace him on the November ballot. DeLay had moved from his suburban Houston congressional district to Virginia.

Democrats sought an order to keep DeLay on the ballot, claiming he could not declared ineligible under the U.S. Constitution until election day. DeLay has not been charged in the Abramoff scandal, but two former aides have pleaded guilty to corruption charges.
Fine, then Tom should move back and run on the platform of "If found guilty, I'll quit and let the governor pick my replacement, not the democrat's." Throw it right in their faces. What's he got to lose?
Posted by:Steve

#5  Contrast this with New Jersey where a new Dem Senate candidate was inserted into the ballot less than 30 days before the election (in violation of NJ law).
Posted by: ed   2006-07-06 19:16  

#4  Siphons off votes with name recognition?
Posted by: 6   2006-07-06 18:22  

#3  What's he got to lose? Not being the first story on the evening news every night. Not revitalizing the "Culture of Corruption" meme for the donks and MSM. Look at what they're doing to Rush. It's ugly and going to stay that way till after the 2012 election when even NPR will have to concede that the donks are the permanent minority. Better to be an influence peddler.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-07-06 18:12  

#2  I would rather an open rebellion against the court and threats to impeach anyone with a hand in this travisty.
Sometimes violence is the correct reaction.
Posted by: wxjames   2006-07-06 17:52  

#1  interesting move, Steve. It just might work.
Posted by: 2b   2006-07-06 14:38  

00:00