| Submit your comments on this article |
| Iraq |
| StrategyPage: Why Iraq WMD Finds Were Kept Secret |
| 2006-06-23 |
| Posted by:ed |
| #7 I recall reading that Churchill "permitting" the bombing of Coventry was/is a myth and a rather vicious one at that. |
| Posted by: JDB 2006-06-23 20:51 |
| #6 Serious points all, but the biggest reason is that there is less benefit to disclosure than to keep secret. Foreseeable is the playing down of any WMD revelation by the MSM and Euros. We see that with pre-1991 degraded materials. While it would have been nice to give some cover to those of us who have strongly held views that undisclosued WMD was there to be discovered (and some is in Syria and Lebanon), the disadvantage weighs more. |
| Posted by: Captain America 2006-06-23 20:29 |
| #5 There's nothing here. Pin no hope on this. |
| Posted by: 6 2006-06-23 18:49 |
| #4 This has been boiling for a while folks. The most I can say is no comment. |
| Posted by: Oldspook 2006-06-23 12:14 |
| #3 I don't buy this as a complete explanation. |
| Posted by: Iblis 2006-06-23 11:56 |
| #2 well, I mean - look at the timing! |
| Posted by: Bobby 2006-06-23 10:09 |
| #1 Waiting for the dems to claim it was an election year stunt. |
| Posted by: bigjim-ky 2006-06-23 09:37 |