You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
El Lay Times: FEMA at fault for wasted funds; don't blame victims
2006-06-18
A hurricane of fraud?
FEMA did mismanage Katrina relief, but it's wrong to blame victims for spending irresponsibly.
Move over, reckless consumers. The Federal Emergency Management Agency has outdone your irresponsible spending by racking up a debit card bill so outrageous it could have been created using Mad Libs. Sex-change operations, vacations to the Dominican Republic and wild nights at strip clubs were all bought on the government's dime by both con artists and legitimate victims of Hurricane Katrina. But try to keep that knee from jerking — although FEMA's oversight was lacking, wasted money is an inevitable byproduct of providing rapid emergency assistance.

The tawdry expenses are listed in a report released Wednesday by the Government Accountability Office. Though the headline makers were select items purchased with debit cards that FEMA gave out immediately after Katrina struck, the centerpiece of the survey was an estimate that about 16% of the agency's more than $6 billion in overall hurricane relief payments were improper and potentially fraudulent. And that figure is probably on the low side because it only accounts for certain categories of fraud, such as misrepresentation of identity and duplicate payments.
Posted by:Slatle Chomotle5631

#6   Sex-change operations, vacations to the Dominican Republic and wild nights at strip clubs were all bought on the government's dime by both con artists

For a moment there, I thought they were talking about Capital Hill!!!
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-06-18 17:18  

#5  I don't honestly care what they spent the money on. Just don't come back sobbing when it's gone and you'd like some more.
Posted by: eLarson   2006-06-18 15:17  

#4  Next time, we need to assign each victim a minder who will determine if expenditures are in accordance with published guidelines for that particular disaster.
Posted by: Ebbaique Snairt4572   2006-06-18 14:05  

#3  LOL Tu! Look closer, though - there was a disclaimer:

"Professional Liberal©, closed mind course - Don't try this at home"
Posted by: Frank G   2006-06-18 13:46  

#2  Bad spending decisions are an unfortunate side effect of a clever and responsive policy.

Gotta remember that one. Might come in handy with the wife. Thanks, LA Times...
Posted by: tu3031   2006-06-18 13:03  

#1  Just like it isn't the fault of the writers and editors of the LAT for their declining sales and readership. They're victims too.
Posted by: Slimp Anginetle6825   2006-06-18 12:58  

00:00