You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
Apologise or we'll cut your funding, US envoy tells UN
2006-06-09
AMERICA’S bitter dispute with the United Nations escalated last night when John Bolton, the US envoy to the UN, threatened to withhold funding to the organisation unless it apologised for the remarks of a senior British official. Speaking at the Centre for Policy Studies in London, Mr Bolton assailed Mark Malloch Brown, the British Deputy UN Secretary-General, for the disparaging remarks he made about the American public this week. “Mark Malloch Brown has a sentence in his speech where he says the role of the UN is a mystery in Middle America,” he said. “Maybe it is fashionable in some circles to look down on Middle America, to say they don’t get the complexities of the world and they don’t have the benefit of continental education and they are deficient in so many ways,” Mr Bolton added. “It is illegitimate for an international civil servant to criticise what he thinks are the inadequacies of citizens of a member government.”

The tough-talking US envoy reiterated that the dispute could harm important reforms to the international body. He also hinted that the US Congress, which controls American government spending, might reconsider US funding to the UN, which accounts for 22 per cent of the organisation’s annual budget. “Congress has the power of the purse and they feel quite strongly on a bipartisan basis that America has a right to know how their tax dollars are being spent, even people from Middle America,” he said, with a note of sarcasm. “I don’t think we have seen the end of it.” Before Mr Bolton arrived in London, Kofi Annan, the UN chief, tried to play down the controversy. “I think the message that was intended is that the US needs the UN, and the UN needs the US, and we need to support each other,” Mr Annan said. “I think the speech by my deputy should be read in the right spirit and let’s put it behind us and move on.”
Posted by:Fred

#21  Stating the obvious: "Middle America" = "Red states"
Posted by: Captain America   2006-06-09 16:49  

#20  There was something about that in the linked article, which is worth reading in full

Mr Annan, under fire from Republicans, began a UN reform drive and sought advice from his American friends, predominantly Democrats. After a secret meeting at the home of the Clinton AdministrationÂ’s UN Ambassador, Richard Holbrooke, Mr Annan named Mr Malloch Brown as his chief of staff in January last year.

The appointment raised eyebrows when it was reported that Mr Malloch Brown was renting a house on George SorosÂ’s estate for $2,500 a month less than the previous occupant. Even before Mr Bolton was named US Ambassador, he seemed destined to clash with Mr Malloch Brown. Mr Soros, Mr Malloch BrownÂ’s landlord and old friend, helped to fund the Stop Bolton campaign, aimed at stopping him from getting the post.

Mr Malloch Brown has been criticised by dissident UN staff for aligning the world body too closely with Democrats in US domestic politics. They accuse him of allowing a UN staffer, Justin Leites, to play a leading role in the 2004 presidential campaign of John Kerry, violating staff rules. It is a charge that he denies. “I don’t consider myself aligned with any American political establishment,” he said. “I am British. I have worked in the UN and in international jobs all of my life.”
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-06-09 13:10  

#19  The Shadow of the Olive Tree: Fisking Malloch Brown

BelmontClub: Malloch Brown's Message to America with side by side Fisking
The complete roster of speakers as given in the program is listed below.

1. Madeleine Albright, Principal, The Albright Group; former U.S. Secretary of State
2. Mark Malloch Brown, U.N. Deputy Secretary-General
3. Introduced by Jeffrey Laurenti, Senior Fellow, The Century Foundation Download
4. Jim Leach, U.S. Congressman from Iowa
5. Richard C. Leone, President, The Century Foundation
6. John Podesta, President, Center for American Progress
7. George Soros, Founder and Chairman, Open Society Institute

[..]
a comment on Belmont's fisk
The UN spokesman giving a lecture to the United States along with Madeleine Albright, John Podesta, and George Soros about American criticism of UN activities? This same Mr. Malloch Brown, while making a net take-home salary of $125,000 a year, was paying $120,000 to rent from Mr. Soros a house adjacent to the billionaire's personal home in Westchester County. The same Malloch Brown trying to justify the 64 billion dollar question on UN Iraqi oil for peace program. Had the UN been conducting itself properly regarding sanctions against Iraq, it is unlikely we would be in the mess in Iraq. Why would there be American criticism over the UN? What are they missing over at Fox?
[..]
Posted by: 3dc   2006-06-09 12:09  

#18  I'd rather see a cut BACK in funding the UN rather than a total cut. Announce it as maybe $00.005 per head that'd be about $1.5 mil. Kinda like the idea of leaving a 2% tip. Talk Japan and Austrailia to contribute on the same basis.

Then we could wait for Kofi &co. to suggest kicking us out. That would be fun.
Posted by: AlanC   2006-06-09 11:13  

#17  Is it too early to start a "Cut and Run" policy with respect to the un? Clearly they are in a "quagmire", too many times the U.S. must are "uniltarally" to get things done, and I don't think anybody has an "Exit Stategery."
CUT FUNDING AND KICK THEM OUT!
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2006-06-09 11:07  

#16  "...the role of the UN is a mystery in Middle America"

By the way...What is the role of the UN these days? I'm not ashamed to say...it's been a mystery to me for some time.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2006-06-09 11:03  

#15  You know when I was a kid, I always thought that there was something weird about the kids that took the UNICEF boxes along for Halloween. It just seemed strange somehow. Giving money to the pagan babies was one thing, but forgoing candy for some acronym agency was something else alltogether.
Posted by: 11A5S   2006-06-09 10:12  

#14  oh please, oh please!

Tokyo would be ever so polite and apologetic as they regretted their inability to contribute heavily this year.
Posted by: lotp   2006-06-09 09:58  

#13  While Bolton doesn't have the wherewithall to cut funding by himself

I'd imagine Bolton is on a pretty short leash, as in he don't say nothing Condi doesn't see first.

Bush may be willing to veto the appropriation in the event one can even get through. (Wouldn't that be a nice first.)

So Kofi and Malloch are now between a rock and a hard place.

Note also that the donks who prevented Darth Bolton from being confirmed have said nothing about his comments. No calls for his resignation, not defence of Malloch Brown. Bolton's right, that sentence is a very very big mistake. He dissed the voters. Always a mistake in a democracy.

Maybe he'd like to insult the japanese next.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-06-09 09:43  

#12  An interesting note...prior to my enlightenment, I was a devoted reader of The Economist, Mark Malloch Brown used to be managing editor of that publication. When the scales fell from my eyes, I cancelled my pricey subscription.

Now that I clearly see trans- (supra-?) national progressivism as the cancer that it is, I wince every time I hear this guy's name.

UN Delenda Est

< tin foil hat > the Economist has a fascinating intellectual ancestry, as a major organ of the LSE school of economics, its roots go back to Keynes and the Fabian Society. < / tin foil hat >
Posted by: mjh   2006-06-09 09:35  

#11  That's a foolish move calling middle America dumb. If all of our right wing bitching and complaing about the UN fell on deaf ears in the midwest, it won't now. Piss off the heartland and see how it goes. What we need is more idiots like Brown saying stupid crap about our heartland and they will find the UN in the ocean just past the Statue of liberty.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2006-06-09 08:07  

#10  "Am I missing something here? :-)"

Nope. I've been paying attention to the U.N. off and on for about a half-century now, and I've seldom seen it coming even close to earning its keep-- and I've NEVER seen it do anything that made me say, "Thank God for the United Nations!"

Kill it, before Soros and his ilk succeed in their ambition to turn the U.N. into a world government.

Posted by: Dave D.   2006-06-09 08:00  

#9  As far as I'm concerned the UN can't do anything right. Can't even put together a decent program to feed an area under famine in a reasonable time, can't keep the peace anywhere unless the locals are tired of fighting, and can't do anything else effectively that I can think of except to backpeddle on everything as soon as they see something might actually happen. Yes, they might have 18 different areas where they are monitoring the peace and they might not take a lot of money to do it, but all they do is watch and not do anything. How much can that cost? Who needs 'em, anyway? I would like to pick up the paper and see something like "UN gets food to an area before everybody there turns into toothpicks for a change", or maybe "UN kicks Iran's ass hard enough for them to behave". Enough of the "threat" of sternly worded notes and rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic while waiting for a situation to just "go away". DO SOMETHING WORTH WRITING HOME ABOUT FOR A CHANGE! Oh yeah, I forgot the second thing the do well: Obstructionism. Comes from thinking too much, which results in doing too little. You can't run this world by committee. Too many crazies out there in charge who don't give a $hit if half of their people starve as long as they get to live a decadent life before they die of old age. Or maybe they think they can trash the world because Allah told them it's OK in a dream.

Something's wrong with the UN in it's present form, and with all this Politically Correct thinking these days, I'm not sure it's even possible to have a UN. Just get rid of it and wait for countries to put out a call for help before someone goes in to bail them out. That's basically what happens these days anyway.

Am I missing something here? :-)
Posted by: grb   2006-06-09 06:52  

#8  I think a cut by the USodA and Japan is in order regardless. It should be a substantial cut.


Let France and Germany pick up the slack. It's only fair, Since those governments seem to that are so superior, advanced, and inteligent and think we are backwards and ignorant.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2006-06-09 06:20  

#7  Apologise or we'll cut your funding, US envoy tells UN

Pay per View MMA Death Match

John Bolton Forces Mark Malloch Brown to Submit
Posted by: RD   2006-06-09 03:49  

#6  "You want bitchy? 'Cause I can DO bitchy, pal..."
Posted by: mojo   2006-06-09 02:35  

#5  Oh gawd, he's British - sigh. I apologise for that.


“I think the message that was intended is that the US needs the UN, and the UN needs the US, and we need to support each other,” Mr Annan said. “I think the speech by my deputy should be read in the right spirit and let’s put it behind us and move on.”


Typical BS from the Tranzi-crowd, one of their minions has uttered what they really think of their hosts (and I use the word 'host' in relation to parasites), and the chief parasite uses the tired narrative of the leftist-statist crowd; "let's all just move on".

Mr Annan, the UN needs the US a lot more than the US needs the UN, as I think you will now find out when Darth Bolton 'has a word'.
Posted by: Tony (UK)   2006-06-09 01:44  

#4  Heh. Wind old Henry Hyde up and let him go, he'll take care of the House.

We'll have to euthanize the Senate, however.
Posted by: Glavitch Angineter5765   2006-06-09 01:40  

#3  Actually Joe, that would make Russia's population 1/3 to 1/4 of the US population : 298,933,286, according to http://www.census.gov/main/www/popclock.html. It would make Russia less populous than the US in 1940 - not a good thing for a country facing an expantionistic China with a billion people on its border.
Posted by: Shieldwolf   2006-06-09 01:04  

#2  Will say again there's always the RUSSIANS - post-Saigon, unified Vietnam's and even Red China's, frowned-upon "Americans/Euros without Money". PRAVDA.ru's headline ala this morning's coffee > RUSSIA TO RETRIEVE ITS STATUS AS WORLD'S GREATEST SUPERPOWER. See also INTERNATIONAL HERALD TRIBUNE [IHT.com] articles on Russian downward-sliding demographics, i.e. Russia's population may be 80-100Milyuuhn only by 2050, sub i.e. less than 1/2 of what America is now.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-06-09 00:55  

#1  Wretchard at The Belmont Club has the link to the full text of Brown's obnoxious speech, co-sponsored by John Pedesta's Center for American Progress. Noticeably attendees: George Soros and Mad Halfbright.

While Bolton doesn't have the wherewithall to cut funding by himself, look for the House to follow up.
Posted by: Captain America   2006-06-09 00:10  

00:00