You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Lavrov: Military Intervention Against Iran Prohibited
2006-06-06
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said possible military intervention against Iran was forbidden according to the agreement signed in Vienna last week.

Making a statement to Nezavisimaya newspaper, Lavrov said they reached a consensus during the meeting, to which foreign ministers of important countries in the world participated, on going to Iran with serious suggestions in Vienna.

Sergei Lavrov noted that they have taken some very serious decisions in order to start the negotiations about the problems concerning suspending IranÂ’s uranium enrichment activities in the frame of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) decision.

Posted by:DanNY

#7  mojo: Key word for dealing with Russkies: nyekulturny
Say it like you mean it, and roll that "R" hard.


heh! mojo, key this


nimokolizardboy

LOL!
Posted by: RD   2006-06-06 19:13  

#6  Key word for dealing with Russkies: nyekulturny
Say it like you mean it, and roll that "R" hard.

Means "uncultured", and drives 'em nuts.
Posted by: mojo   2006-06-06 16:29  

#5  I am tired of all this talking. What is needed is to bring very bright suns to shine on Iran.
Posted by: 3dc   2006-06-06 12:27  

#4  The Russians will enjoy being under Iranian nuke missiles. Have fun trying to keep all that territory you stole from the muslims.
Posted by: ed   2006-06-06 11:37  

#3  I got just one monkey wrench to throw in your gears Sergei old boy.

ISRAEL....
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-06-06 11:34  

#2  No, my readings of the Vienna agreement as released over the Net says non-intervention is binding only iff Iran formally overtly agrees to give up nuclear weapons and allows international inspections to verify same, lest sanctions be imposed. Remember, for Sanctions to work IRAN, ESPEC AS A UNO MEMBER-STATE, MUST FORMALLY AGREE, LIKE SADDAM DID, TO ACCEPT OR SUBMIT TO SAID SANCTIONS - OTHERWISE, FAILURE BY IRAN TO DO SO BY DEFINITION RISKS REFERRAL TO THE UNSC AT ANY TIME(S) FOR MIL ACTION [e.g. KOREAN WAR 1]. Iran and Moud-Mullahs cannot say Yes = No - Saddam PC bitched about it but still PUBLICLY/OFFICIALLY accepted it for his Iraq. IRAN MUST DO THE SAME. This is Dubya, Cheney, and Rummy now, NOT Clinton and Monica and a few bombs over Kosovo.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-06-06 00:37  

#1  Holy heck we have given up already? I have a hard time buying into such a "concept" that if it becomes required we will not use arms to impose and inforce sanctions.

Of course expect Farnce, Russia and Germany to get on the sanctions gravy train ala Iraq at the earliest date possible.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2006-06-06 00:21  

00:00