| Submit your comments on this article |
| Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
| Jewish MP denies Iran badge plan |
| 2006-05-20 |
| IRAN'S only Jewish MP strongly denied reports in a Canadian newspaper overnight that Iran may force non-Muslims to wear coloured badges in public so they can be identified. "This report is a complete fabrication and is totally false," Maurice Motammed said in Tehran. "It is a lie, and the people who invented it wanted to make political gain" by doing so. The National Post newspaper quoted human rights groups as saying that Iran's parliament passed a law this week setting a public dress code and requiring non-Muslims to wear special insignia. Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians would be forced to wear a yellow, red or blue strip of cloth, respectively, on the front of their clothes, it said. Mr Motammed said he had been present in parliament when a bill to promote "an Iranian and Islamic style of dress for women" was voted. "In the law, there is no mention of religious minorities," he added. MPs representing Iran's Jewish, Christian and Zoroastrian minorities sit on all parliamentary committees, particularly the cultural one, he said. "This is an insult to the Iranian people and to religious minorities in Iran," he said. Australian Prime Minister John Howard said overnight, during an official visit to Ottawa, that "anything of that kind would be totally repugnant to civilised countries, if it's the case, and something that would just further indicate to me the nature of this regime. It would be appalling." Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper said he had only seen reports about the law but that he would not be surprised by them. "Unfortunately, we have seen enough already from the Iranian regime to suggest that it is very capable of this kind of action," he said. "It think it boggles the mind that any regime on the face of the earth would want to do anything that could remind people of Nazi Germany," he added. "The fact that such a measure could even be contemplated, I think, is absolutely abhorrent." Harper's parliamentary secretary, Jason Kenney, told the House of Commons that Canadian officials were trying to verify the claims. |
| Posted by:Nimble Spemble |
| #3 Thin - I suspect you are right. Allowing a visual clue other than arm bands will allow the rest of the world to sleep well with their decision to ignore the equivalent of yellow arm bands. |
| Posted by: 2b 2006-05-20 12:03 |
| #2 Mr Motammed said he had been present in parliament when a bill to promote "an Iranian and Islamic style of dress for women" was voted. "In the law, there is no mention of religious minorities," he added. Then Mr Motammed didn't attend the full meeting. Being a Jew, he was probably asked to leave. The law does not apply to just women. the Iranian and Islamic dress code applies to men. And the ban on western clothing applies to all. Which does present the problem of identifying the infidels if all are in Iranian Islamic garb. The cloth strips story was probably an idea bandied about by the lawmakers. More likely end result will be an approved "infidel costume" that looks islamic but will provide a visual queue of infidel status. Whether they go all the way to separate "jew", "christian", etc fashion looks, or just a one-size-fits-all-infidels costume, it's the same thing. |
| Posted by: Thinemp Whimble2412 2006-05-20 11:05 |
| #1 like I said here what difference does it make? It's like they think that if you don't wear a wedding band you are free from the bonds of marriage. |
| Posted by: 2b 2006-05-20 10:59 |