You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Mexico Threatens Suits Over Guard Patrols
2006-05-16
Excellent! No Doubt in who this favors? - way to encourage a backlash assholes!
Write your Congresscritters and senators and tell them you want to remain Americans, rather than an overrun country

Mexico said Tuesday that it would file lawsuits in U.S. courts if National Guard troops on the border become directly involved in detaining migrants.

Mexican border officials also said they worried that sending troops to heavily trafficked regions would push illegal migrants into more perilous areas of the U.S.-Mexican border to avoid detection.

President Bush announced Monday that he would send 6,000 National Guard troops to the 2,000-mile border, but they would provide intelligence and surveillance support to Border Patrol agents, not catch and detain illegal immigrants.

"If there is a real wave of rights abuses, if we see the National Guard starting to directly participate in detaining people ... we would immediately start filing lawsuits through our consulates," Foreign Secretary Luis Ernesto Derbez told a Mexico City radio station. He did not offer further details.

Mexican officials worry the crackdown will lead to more deaths. Since Washington toughened security in Texas and California in 1994, migrants have flooded Arizona's hard-to-patrol desert and deaths have spiked. Migrant groups estimate 500 people died trying to cross the border in 2005. The Border Patrol reported 473 deaths in the fiscal year ending Sept. 30.

In Ciudad Juarez, Julieta Nunez Gonzalez, local representative of the Mexican government's National Immigration Institute, said Tuesday she will ask the government to send its migrant protection force, known as Grupo Beta, to more remote sections of the border.

Sending the National Guard "will not stop the flow of migrants, to the contrary, it will probably go up," as people try to get into the U.S. in the hope that they could benefit from a possible amnesty program, Nunez said.

Juan Canche, 36, traveled more than 1,200 miles to the border from the southern town of Izamal and said nothing would stop him from trying to cross.

"Even with a lot of guards and soldiers in place, we have to jump that puddle," said Canche, referring to the drought-stricken Rio Grande dividing Ciudad Juarez and El Paso, Texas. "My family is hungry and there is no work in my land. I have to risk it."

Some Mexican newspapers criticized President Vicente Fox for not taking a stronger stand against the measure, even though Fox called Bush to express his concerns.

A political cartoon in the Mexico City newspaper Reforma depicted Bush as a gorilla carrying a club with a flattened Fox stuck to it.

Fox's spokesman, Ruben Aguilar, said Tuesday that Mexico accepted Bush's statement that the sending in the National Guard didn't mean militarizing the area. He also said Mexico remained "optimistic" that the U.S. Senate would approve an immigration reform "in the interests of both countries."

Aguilar noted that Bush expressed support for the legalization of some immigrants and implementation of a guest worker program.

"This is definitely not a militarization," said Aguilar, who also dismissed as "absolutely false" rumors that Mexico would send its own troops to the border in response.

Bush has said sending the National Guard is intended as a stopgap measure while the Border Patrol builds up resources to more effectively secure the border.

In Nuevo Laredo, across from Laredo, Texas, Honduran Antonio Auriel said he would make it into the U.S.

"Soldiers on the border? That won't stop me," he said. "I'll swim the river and jump the wall. I'm going to arrive in the United States."

Posted by:Frank G

#11  I think it's about time to start patrolling the border with A-10s with live ammo and "shoot to kill" orders. I'll bet that would put a crimp in both the ACLU and the Mexican Military Mafia.

The ACLU deserve to be targets, and I wouldn't cry a second if any of them were "accidentally" shot between the eyes - the Communist bastards.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2006-05-16 23:47  

#10  Force land reform on Mexico. Take it away from the rich families that keep sending the poor to the north by denying them a future and give it to the peasants.. Give them a reason to stay in Mexico.
Posted by: 3dc   2006-05-16 23:27  

#9  Forget about the National Guard. A much cheaper more effective solution. A barb-wire fence with lots of warning signs (in English and Spanish and pictograms) along the border. Another fence one hundred yards away running parallel to the first. In between - land mines.
Posted by: DMFD   2006-05-16 22:48  

#8  LMAO. No standing. Mexico enforces laws with it's Military. Mexico's Military has been caught on film violating our territory. More incidents have been doccumented.

Mexico better be happy we keep our Military and Police on our side fo the Border unlike them.
Posted by: SPoD   2006-05-16 22:26  

#7  Random sniping along the boarder as official policy.

The flow will dry up in a couple of weeks.
Posted by: Kelly   2006-05-16 21:51  

#6  The ACLU and the pro-Castro Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) gladly will line up and offer their "legal" services.
Posted by: Lancasters Over Dresden   2006-05-16 21:48  

#5  The disinformation is certainly flying hot and heavy. So far, it's even unclear if the 6,000 troops will be there to play tiddley-winks and catch up on email skills - or actually do something constructive to stop the flow.
Posted by: Unomorong Whereck6576   2006-05-16 21:42  

#4  You Mexican !@#$ heads, If Bush had a pair he would be sending the freaking 82nd Airborne to the border!.
Posted by: FeralCat   2006-05-16 21:41  

#3  "if National Guard troops on the border become directly involved in detaining migrants"
Migrants? How about "foreign invaders"? Mexico is not respecting our sovereignty. That should draw a harsh response, even if they don't file their f*@#ing lawsuits. Personally, I think we need to start laying some landmines to get their attention.
Posted by: Darrell   2006-05-16 21:35  

#2  Wonder how they'd feel about minefields?
Posted by: tu3031   2006-05-16 21:16  

#1  Hey Mexico, Suck it! You want us to storm the halls of Montezuma again? Then shut your fucking piehole!
Posted by: DarthVader   2006-05-16 20:31  

00:00