You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
US, EU planning economic incentives to entice Iran away from nukes
2006-05-10
The United States and its European negotiating partners are preparing to repackage economic incentives aimed at inducing Iran to cooperate in eliminating its suspected nuclear weapons program, and to add some "new ideas" for Iran to consider, American and European officials said Tuesday.

A senior State Department official said the "new ideas" would not substantially change the package of economic incentives offered to Iran last August, when the Europeans told the Iranians they could achieve a full political and economic relationship with the West if Iran ended its nuclear activities suspected as part of a weapons program.

He said that, contrary to some reports circulating Tuesday, the new package would not include security guarantees for Iran and would not allow it to continue enriching uranium, an activity that Iran defends as part of a nuclear energy program but that the United States views as a cover for a weapons program.

Disclosure of the new initiative on incentives came from European diplomats on Tuesday, following a full evening of discussions with American officials on Monday. Envoys from Russia and China also attended that session.

American officials say the evening discussions failed to break an impasse over the American, British and French drive for a United Nations Security Council resolution that would make it mandatory for Iran to suspend its uranium enrichment activities, stop construction of a heavy-water nuclear reactor and resume talks with the West.

Russia and China oppose such a resolution as too threatening and are likely to provoke a counterreaction, causing Iran to abandon all cooperation with international nuclear inspections.

European diplomats said one emphasis of the dinner on Monday, which was led by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, was a new effort to persuade Iran that the West was offering "carrots" as well as "sticks" to get it to change course.

"My point of view is that Iran must be faced with a choice," Philippe Douste-Blazy, the French foreign minister, said in an interview. "If Iran is closed to our proposals, we are prepared to discuss deterrent measures. But it seems stupid for us not to stretch out our hand."

Ms. Rice said lower-level diplomats would try to iron out differences on a Council resolution on Iran next week in London and possibly in further meetings after that. Separate discussions on presenting a package of incentives to Iran would also occur at that time.

The original incentives offered to Iran by the Europeans entailed restoration of economic and technical assistance for Iran's development. As part of that package, the United States consented to let discussions start on Iran's joining the World Trade Organization and receiving aircraft spare parts.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#12  Maybe saving them the cost of cleaning up rubble, processing radioactive Mullah's, etc......
Posted by: OyVey 1   2006-05-10 20:49  

#11  LibHawk, plz, the "carrots and sticks" and "convincing the Euros" is like pissing into a strong wind.

Lesson #1: The Moolahs cannot be swayed from doing nuke weapons, no amount of dough or caning will stop them. They are in love with the bomb.

Lesson #2: The Euros are a collections of weak-kneed sisters who have been fucking around with the Irantians for over three years. They have gotten screwed at every corner, have had their faces dragged through Moolah shit.

There is only one answer: Bomb or be bombed, let's get rockin'
Posted by: Captain America   2006-05-10 17:22  

#10  Maybe we can get them to eat pork.
Posted by: wxjames   2006-05-10 15:42  

#9  "Bounce the rubble"
Posted by: Gen. Curtis LeMay   2006-05-10 12:18  

#8  Talk softly, but carry a big stick
Posted by: Theodore Roosevelt   2006-05-10 11:51  

#7  "Diplomacy is the art of saying 'nice doggie' whilst one reaches for a stone."
-- Wm. Disraeli
Posted by: mojo   2006-05-10 10:14  

#6  I think that it's way past time that the US told the UN and the rest of the world to go suck eggs. We do not have to revert to isolationism, we can build meaningful bilateral agreements with the Japans, Indias and Aussies of the world. Why should I give a hoot about placating the EUSSR or helping the Russians and Chinese "save face"?

But we should become the curmogeon and demand that others placate US if they want to do something. We don't have to be the bully, but, when something comes up outside our true friends (see above) the first question should be "What's in it for us?"
Posted by: AlanC   2006-05-10 10:01  

#5  the goal is

1. To placate Russia and China, to get them onboard. No one here really thinks the MMs will give up enrichment for incentives anyway, so whats to lose?

2. To save face for Russia and China - theyve talked about being against sanctions so much, its hard for them to support a Chapter 7 res without SOME concessions from the West, or they look weak.

3. To keep any wavering Euros on board.


And yes, this delays things. Hopefully not too long.
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2006-05-10 09:43  

#4  Lunacy.
Posted by: twobyfour   2006-05-10 01:57  

#3  How's this for an incentive to the top political leadership in Iran (the Mullahs, not their puppet Ahmenijiahd):

You stop building your bomb making technology, and we will not kill your family via bombing and special ops.
Posted by: Oldspook   2006-05-10 01:55  

#2  Tinhorn genocidal dictators of the world rejoice! The path to your nations achieving a "full political and economic relationship with the West" has been made clear.

*sigh*
Posted by: AzCat   2006-05-10 01:45  

#1  And it goes on and on and on and ...
Less talk please!
Posted by: Oh-Oh   2006-05-10 00:35  

00:00