Submit your comments on this article | ||
India-Pakistan | ||
Showdown in Pakistan imminent? | ||
2006-05-05 | ||
![]() Realistically, eight months is likely to be too ambitious a time frame for a Taliban victory, if victory is achievable at all. Nevertheless, there is no doubt that the Taliban movement is poised to enhance its nuisance level significantly in the United States' strategic back yards in the region - notably Afghanistan and Pakistan. Acutely aware of this, the US is leaning heavily on Pakistan, its key ally in the "war on terror" in the region, to go on the offensive against the strong Taliban foothold in the North and South Waziristan tribal areas on the border with Afghanistan. What the US is asking for, in effect, is a Tora Bora-style aerial bombing of the area, similar to that undertaken in the mountains of that name in Afghanistan during the rout of the Taliban five years ago. The Taliban are integrated into the local population and there would be high civilian casualties. This is considered acceptable as civilians would be deemed Taliban sympathizers.
This is the first time since the fall of the Taliban that the al-Qaeda leadership has activated Pakistani jihadis all over the country for operations both inside and outside the country. The effect of this is illustrated by an incident in Kandahar, Afghanistan, recently in which three suicide bombers were arrested after they failed to detonate their devices because of technical problems. All three were from the Pakistani port city of Karachi. Detailed investigations at the Kandahar military base by agents of the US Federal Bureau of Investigation revealed a network starting from a book shop in Karachi, going on to a contact in Quetta, the capital of Balochistan province in Pakistan, and then on to Chaman in the same province. From there the three men launched their attack in Kandahar. These arrests spotlight just one of many powerful networks established across Pakistan to carry out jihadi activities on a scale that has not existed since the fall of the Taliban. This is reinforced by a recent broadcast by Ayman al-Zawahiri, al-Qaeda's No 2, in which he called on Pakistanis to topple President General Pervez Musharraf, calling him "a bribe-taking, treacherous criminal". He especially asked the Pakistani army to mutiny against Musharraf. Zawahiri made a similar broadcast in 2003, but a lot has changed since then. At that time, the Taliban were bruised and down, scattered and without central leadership. Al-Qaeda was also on the run, its network in a shambles, and survival was the only issue. Broadcasts by bin Laden and Zawahiri had only two purposes: to keep the morale of the jihadis high and to sow uncertainty in the ranks of the rival camp. Both aims were achieved. Each message kept the jihadis spiritually connected with their leadership, and opponents were kept guessing about the Taliban and al-Qaeda. Soon after Zawahiri's call, a number of assassination attempts were made on Musharraf's life, with the complicity of sections within the armed forces. In the meantime, al-Qaeda began to develop its "netwar" strategy - a complex organization of cells and groups. While Zawahiri continued his broadcasts, bin Laden disappeared from the scene. To keep thousands of inactive jihadis in Pakistan involved and to bring them into al-Qaeda's net, various methods were used, including the distribution of training manuals, motivational compact discs and action clips of the Taliban in Afghanistan. At the same time, al-Qaeda and the Taliban established a foothold in North Waziristan, renaming it the "Islamic State of North Waziristan" and seizing virtual control of the area. Jihadis were invited to the base, which has expanded to parts of South Waziristan and neighboring villages in Afghanistan. This was in preparation for the Taliban's powerful spring offensive, which is now under way, directed toward Kabul as well as Islamabad. The sudden emergence of bin Laden in a broadcast this month was a global message to the jihadi movement, urging them to come to the base (Waziristan) as a new "war" had begun, of which the spring offensive is the first major salvo. This was followed by Zawahiri's call to do battle against Musharraf. Unlike in 2003, the jihadis are now much better organized to take on the Pakistani establishment. The situation is now dangerously poised. Musharraf, under US pressure, is prepared for an all-out attack on the Taliban and al-Qaeda. At the same time, the military rulers are well aware of the renewed strength of the jihadis, and are extremely reluctant to go for the "final solution" and all it would involve. Asia Times Online contacts claim that in this explosive environment, some sort of a compromise deal, as in the past, might be worked out, with both sides agreeing to back off for the time being. In such an eventuality, the only winners would be the Taliban and al-Qaeda: they can only go from strength to strength, and they will not give up on their ultimate goal of toppling the administrations in Kabul and Islamabad. The following are translated excerpts from a broadcast by Ayman al-Zawahiri that was aired on Arabic television last weekend. ... As for the second thing I wish to talk to you about, it is the dark fate toward which the traitor Musharraf is pushing Pakistan. Without a doubt, Pakistan is one of the most important of the countries targeted by this new colonialist crusade which seeks to weaken Pakistan and fragment it into entities under the control of India, which is allied with the Americans and Jews. | ||
Posted by:Dan Darling |
#25 Utter and complete bullshit. "Across the jihdi world" right. Across the fruited plain Omar will be on ice in 2006. |
Posted by: Captain America 2006-05-05 20:55 |
#24 Itn the Welsh that are scrwer up the table. Handicapped with too many consonants in they yoof. |
Posted by: 6 2006-05-05 19:44 |
#23 Lol, sludge - my thoughts exactly. I lived there for awhile and quickly came to the conclusion they were infinitely more attractive than the Euro variety. |
Posted by: Thinert Flitle1614 2006-05-05 18:45 |
#22 mmm... smart Indian girls with Bristish accents |
Posted by: sludge 2006-05-05 18:33 |
#21 Note that Paks replicate their failures unto the second and third generations... These are high school results from the UK http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=268 Proportion of boys and girls aged 16 who achieved 5 of more GCSEs (grade A*-C), 1999 ![]() |
Posted by: john 2006-05-05 18:13 |
#20 Lib. Hawk. When I visited Karachi as a kid in 1965 it was scarier then Aden (which became the peoples democratic republic of a few days after I left it)... It was even scarier than Jakarta in the middle of the revolution... Now days it is worse. One could do worse than cross it off the list of inhabited places. |
Posted by: 3dc 2006-05-05 17:45 |
#19 "I think Quetta would be an ideal target area for us to totally destroy" yeah, it would be a really great idea to have perv gone, and have Hamid Gul as president of Pakistan, with Bin Laden, Zawahiri, Mullah Omar, and AQ Khan at his side. People think only Americans are Jacksonian. What would you have us do then, bomb Islamabad and Karachi to bricks? |
Posted by: Liberalhawk 2006-05-05 17:36 |
#18 3dc -- I said it's assumed. There are always exceptions. So the name change from Bizzaro World to Jihadi World is official? Nah. "Jihadi World" is the sequel to Bakshi's "Cool World". |
Posted by: Rob Crawford 2006-05-05 14:31 |
#17 I've said repeatedly that we've missed the boat on how to deal with the jihadis. They understand only one thing - power. We need to display just how POWERFUL we can be, without using nuke weapons. I think Quetta would be an ideal target area for us to totally destroy, not only breaking the rocks, but breaking the pieces into sand. Then we need to start up the Afghan/Pak border, indiscriminately bombing the he$$ out of everything until there's not two bricks standing. THEN let "mullah omar" claim how powerful he is. Of course, that won't really work, because the taliban will simply move back into central Pakistan, and leave the Pashtuns to their fate. The only thing that will really work is to completely smash Pakistan, hang all the members of the ISI, shoot all the imams, destroy all the madrassahs, and give what's left over to Fiji. We're "too sensitive" to be that brutal, and it's going to end up costing us thousands of American lives because of it. We're fighting barbarians here, not civilized human beings. We need to fight them on their level, because they don't understand anything else. |
Posted by: Old Patriot 2006-05-05 13:58 |
#16 Showdown in Pakistan imminent? Palestinian Police will fight terrorists. |
Posted by: gromgoru 2006-05-05 12:05 |
#15 I beg to differ. Michael Yon is a great reporter! http://www.michaelyon-online.com also: Michael Totten is a reporter too. |
Posted by: 3dc 2006-05-05 11:18 |
#14 My bad, 2x4. You're right -- it's the journalists who fit that description. I don't think there's been a prominent reporter in the business in my lifetime, though, so I hope you understand my confusion. |
Posted by: Rob Crawford 2006-05-05 10:21 |
#13 RC, no, he's a journalist. Reporter's job is to report, while journo "influences opinions". I haven't seen a reporter in a long time, almost as if they became extinct. |
Posted by: twobyfour 2006-05-05 10:09 |
#12 One their hacks, called Pepe Escobar, is a lying, American-hating, marxist dog. He's a reporter, right? So "lying, American-hating, Marxist dog" is assumed. |
Posted by: Rob Crawford 2006-05-05 09:33 |
#11 Actually, it wouldn't be an entirely bad idea to allow the Jihadis to completely dominate a half province in Pakland and maybe even a cluster of villages in Afghanistan. It would allow for more efficient information gathering on our part and would arguably also redistribute some jihadis from the interior of Afghanistan to the jihadi districts. |
Posted by: mhw 2006-05-05 09:14 |
#10 When I read articles like this now, I have in mind Shelby Steele's words about our being "delicate with the enemy", and our "minimalism and restraint in war". Why haven't we totally exterminated the Taliban by now? And why haven't we crushed Waziristan by now? When are we going to get serious? If Zawahiri was feeling the full force of US power, he wouldn't have time for writing his fantasy fiction,in which he stupidly imagines that there is some real comparison between the jihadis and the Crusaders (may God protect them). The jihadi is to the Crusader like a tick on a lion, but the lion is holding back. Sorry, maybe I just don't understand the difficulties involved. |
Posted by: HV 2006-05-05 08:39 |
#9 Across the jihadi world, there is a strong conviction that by the end of this year Taliban leader Mullah Omar will be back in power in Afghanistan, from where he was driven by US-led forces in 2001. So the name change from Bizzaro World to Jihadi World is official? |
Posted by: tu3031 2006-05-05 08:37 |
#8 Even the president of India is a Muslim And the paks hate him. Not only is he a muslim, he is a rocket scientist who built India's first space launch vehicles, its first ballistic missiles and who supervised the second Indian nuclear test series. Paks see him and compare him to the metallurgist AQ Khan, "the father of the islamic bomb". While AQ Khan lives under house arrest, in disgrace, APJ Abdul Kalam lives in the Raj era palace built for the Viceroy. |
Posted by: john 2006-05-05 06:40 |
#7 Here is the Pakistani stupidity. ...Pakistan is actually causing poverty to the Muslims in Kashmir. You make the assumption that Pakistan cares about the welfare of Indian muslims. It does not. Prosperous Indian muslims are not in the interest of Pakistan. That is why you see the envy of Bangalore and the jihadi attacks starting there. The desire to wreck the Indian economy is strong. If Indian muslims prosper, then what was Pakistan created for? This is what the Pak people will ask their rulers and there is no easy answer. |
Posted by: john 2006-05-05 06:34 |
#6 Dan, Here is the Pakistani stupidity. There are more Muslims in India than in Pakistan. Muslims in India are far better socially and economically than Muslims in Pakistan. Even the president of India is a Muslim and he is the second Muslim president of India. Kashmir used to be a touristÂ’s heaven adding a huge sum of money to benefit the majority Muslim population of Kashmir. Pakistani inspired / supported Islamic terrorism has destroyed the tourist business in Kashmir and by doing so Pakistan is actually causing poverty to the Muslims in Kashmir. |
Posted by: Annon 2006-05-05 06:05 |
#5 Syed Saleem Shahzad in particular, while having some interesting things to say, has been essentially repeating the same article about the Taliban resurgence for 3 years now. |
Posted by: Paul Moloney 2006-05-05 05:51 |
#4 It doesn't surprise me this report is from Asia Times, which has a track record of hyping up the capabilities of the Jihadis and acting as their mouthpiece. In October 2001 they were saying that the US was in an "unwinnable" war in Afghanistan. One their hacks, called Pepe Escobar, is a lying, American-hating, marxist dog. |
Posted by: Apostate 2006-05-05 04:48 |
#3 Thats all good. "Fry them up Dano" To choose between India or Pakistan what should we do. I'll go with India. |
Posted by: SPoD 2006-05-05 04:16 |
#2 Great read, Dan - Thank-you. Time to get across that border and clean up N & S Waziristan NOW - if the taliban are really resurgent and inflict any serious casualties on NATO/US troops then it could well be crunch time for Perv - time to face up to the old-lags in the ISI who are seemingly pulling the strings in Pakland. If they plan on taking power in Afghanistan(!) then they better have an answer to the Crusader-Zionist Death Ray™ we used on them so effectively in 2001! |
Posted by: Howard UK 2006-05-05 04:03 |
#1 Dust the whole of Waziristan with ... |
Posted by: 3dc 2006-05-05 02:51 |