You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Protesters plead guilty but claim victory
2006-04-26
Four activists accused of fighting with police during a raucous immigration protest in Arlington Heights were sentenced Tuesday to court supervision and community service work after they pleaded guilty to misdemeanor battery.

But once they stepped outside the Cook County courtroom, the four Chicago residents quickly claimed victory and denied any wrongdoing during last fall's demonstration. "We did nothing wrong on Oct. 15," said Cindy Gomez, one of the activists who accepted the plea deal with prosecutors to avoid a trial. "We stand by everything we did."

"We feel the agreement we came to was an important victory,'' added Kara Norlander, another of the demonstrators arrested last fall as they protested outside a meeting of the Chicago Minutemen Project.

The guilty pleas may not end the legal action stemming from the demonstration. Rehana Khan, one of the activists, is weighing a civil lawsuit against Arlington Heights, saying that while arresting her, police officers forcibly removed her religious head scarf.
Any chance of filing a suit against these mooks?
The claims of a legal victory rankled prosecutors and Arlington Heights officials, who said the guilty pleas speak louder than the statements made afterward.
Not in progressive la-la land; they spoke truth to power, y'know.
"It's absurd to suggest they were innocent when they in fact pleaded guilty," Assistant State's Attorney Lance Northcutt said.
So take the plea bargain off the table and go to trial.
The four charged were among a group of several hundred demonstrators who gathered last fall outside the Christian Liberty Academy to protest a meeting of the Minuteman Project, a group that opposes illegal immigration.

Critics say the group -- which provides volunteers to patrol the nation's borders -- is a racist organization that encourages vigilante action against immigrants crossing into the United States from Mexico.
More intelligent, sane people say the Minutemen are patriots and volunteers who are calling attention to a festering issue.
Arlington Heights police arrested five people during the rally, saying they blocked an entrance to the building, then hit or struggled with officers trying to remove them. Charged with battery and resisting arrest were Gomez, 28; Norlander, 24; Khan, 23; Eric Zenke, 18, and Marco Quiroz-Rojas. All were in court Tuesday for the expected start of their trial except Quiroz-Rojas, a Chicago man who disappeared after being released on bail.

In the plea bargain, Gomez, Norlander, Khan and Zenke pleading guilty to battery, while prosecutors agreed to drop the resisting arrest charges. Judge Hyman Riebman sentenced each to one year of court supervision and ordered each to do 240 hours of community service work. They had faced a maximum sentence of a year in jail.
For the community service, have them help build the fence.
Arlington Heights Village Attorney Ernest Blomquist said he was satisfied with the plea deal, but a Minutemen leader ripped the punishment as too lax. "I'm just sorry they weren't thrown into prison for 10 years for assaulting police," said Rosanna Pulido, a co-founder of the Chicago Minutemen Project.

Khan, a college student, said she felt her "religious rights'' were violated when officers removed the hijab, or religious head scarf, she was wearing during the protest. "It is very disrespecting,'' she said.

Arlington Heights police defended their handling of the protest and said Khan's head scarf had to be removed as a security precaution because it could have covered a weapon or dangerous object. "We're pleased with the way our officers responded,'' Capt. Jerry Lambert said.
You're not the only one, Captain Lambert. Keep up the good work, officers.
Posted by:ryuge

#3  "...removing the hijab, or head scarf" > i.e. the burden is on the local and State Govts to ensure any legit official photo, no matter how costly or inconvenient to the Public Sector and lawful individuals, and which entails the dev of myriad new bureaucracies and sub-bureaucracies, regulations and sub-regulations, manuals and sub-manuals, etal. up the elbow and down the back and up the elbow again, which the protesters andor illegals will not have to pay for since the essence of the protests is for the illegals to stay permanently illegal, permanently subsidized at legal citizens'/residents' expense, and ultimately of course the formation of a State(s)-within-the-State. I haven't heard one activist yet whom has publicly said he or she is willing to pay higher personal taxes or any taxes to support the rights of the illegals to stay perman illegal and perman publicly welfarized in America.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-04-26 23:39  

#2  You don't suppose Marco Quiroz-Rojas could be an illegal alien, do you? No mention of a warrant being issued for not showing up by the plea Bargain barristers, or is the Bargain still available when he gets bagged next time?
Posted by: Inspector Clueso   2006-04-26 12:48  

#1  It is very disrespecting

So is your behavor.
Posted by: DarthVader   2006-04-26 12:00  

00:00