You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Taliban mounting assassination campaign against Afghan mullahs
2006-04-22
A Taliban campaign to intimidate moderate Islamic leaders in Afghanistan appears to be working.

A week ago, suspected Taliban insurgents gunned down a pro-government mullah on the steps of his mosque in a village 20 kilometres west of Kandahar City. It was only the latest in a series of assassinations of moderate religious leaders.

Many mullahs say they have lost faith in the ability of Hamid Karzai's government or the coalition forces to protect them.

The respected leader of Kandahar's Shura Council, Mullah Gulam Mohamed, is so concerned for his safety that he doesn't even go to his own mosque anymore. "Yes, we are afraid of the Taliban," he says. "We support the government but the Taliban say the coalition troops are infidels who are occupying Afghanistan and they have threatened to kill everyone who speaks well of them."

Twelve mullahs belonging to Kandahar's 175-member Shura Council have been assassinated in the past four years.

Canadian troops have recently taken over responsibility for Kandahar. But far from bringing improvement, Mohamed says the level of fear is growing. This week alone, four mullahs on the council telephoned Mohamed asking his permission to resign. He says they had lost faith in the ability and the commitment of the government and the coalition to protect them. "The government didn't even send a representative to the funeral of Mullah Mulavi last week," he says. "And if we are killed the government will not take care of our families. So for what reason should we risk getting killed?"

The district police chief says Mullah Mulavi was killed as an example. "The Taliban did not kill Mullah Mulavi because of his religious views, or even his tribe," says police chief Major Zamani. "They killed him to show people that the coalition is not strong enough to protect them."

The Taliban say the coalition forces are infidels and is urging people to rise up against them because they are occupying Afghanistan.

Zamani says this is now a holy war and the coalition troops have to get a lot more aggressive in hunting down Taliban suspects and then get out. "They have to fight harder and finish up quickly," he says.

The Taliban's increasingly successful campaign to silence the moderate mullahs is a worrying sign for the Canadian troops in Kandahar. Support from respected religious leaders is a key element in giving Karzai's Western-backed government credibility.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#5  "Their weakness has to be in how they are able to motivate their 'fighters' to shoot schoolteachers, doctors, etc. and blow up markets of women and children shopping etc. That is such 'unnatural' behavior that it has to take time to create the mindset."

It IS their weakness. They destroy all that is not "pure." Now define "pure." In this world it just doesn't exist, so these are just mindless killing machines incapable of compromise: hence the name terror-bot. Redirected, that mindlessness will destroy itself. See Zman and Al Queda's reputation in Iraq.
Posted by: Spinemp Thrimp5747   2006-04-22 20:18  

#4  In both Afghanistan and Iraq the definition of the battle is this: if they kill innocent civilians on purpose they 'win' because you failed to protect, if you kill innocent civilians as collateral damage they win, and since they can look like innocent civilians they win even if you kill them.
This strikes me as too asymmetric to win.


Glenmore: One very key exponent [power] in the asymmetric expression missing.

It's algebraic, to whit.

asymmetrically the fruits of terrorism are recognized [defined]and reported™ ad nauseum as a win by the opponents of America's war on terrorism. [WOT]
Posted by: RD   2006-04-22 15:27  

#3  That is such 'unnatural' behavior that it has to take time to create the mindset.

Not for a muzzie, it's 2nd 1st nature.
Posted by: 6   2006-04-22 12:58  

#2  In both Afghanistan and Iraq the definition of the battle is this: if they kill innocent civilians on purpose they 'win' because you failed to protect, if you kill innocent civilians as collateral damage they win, and since they can look like innocent civilians they win even if you kill them.
This strikes me as too asymmetric to win. Their weakness has to be in how they are able to motivate their 'fighters' to shoot schoolteachers, doctors, etc. and blow up markets of women and children shopping etc. That is such 'unnatural' behavior that it has to take time to create the mindset. It has to be happening in certain mosques and religious schools. These need to be infiltrated, identified and destroyed.
Posted by: Glenmore   2006-04-22 10:22  

#1  The solution for this are quick trials, followed by mass public hangings of Taliban.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-04-22 08:56  

00:00