Submit your comments on this article |
Afghanistan |
Temporary marriage catches on in Afghanistan |
2006-04-22 |
![]() TWENTY-NINE-year-old mechanic Payenda Mohammad was married last month in a simple ceremony in this northern Afghanistan town, but the marriage only lasted four hours, which was exactly what he wanted. “Nobody would give me their daughters to marry because I didn’t have family or money,” says Payenda, who ended up in Iran after his parents and a sister were killed in a bombing raid about 15 years ago. “I started doing short marriages in Iran,” he says. “When I came back to Mazar-i-Sharif, I continued,” he says. He’s now been married 20 times. In a country where most marriages are for life and all divorces are a scandal, the idea of the contract or temporary marriage is beginning to catch on. Afghanistan’s majority Sunni Muslims ban the marriages, known as fegha in the main Dari language, but the Shias accept them and some people here, like Payenda, got the idea from Iran. Such marriages were rare in Afghanistan before the Sunni-dominated Taliban regime was overthrown in late 2001, ending 25 years of war. But with the return of many of the nearly two million Afghans who fled to Shia Iran during the conflict, contract marriages are gaining popularity - although they are still unusual. The process is simple. To get married, a couple takes an oath in front of a mullah that makes them man and wife for a stipulated period of time - from a few hours to a few years. Afterwards they can choose to marry each other again or move on. Shia clerics defend the practice as something that benefits both the men and women. “For a man it means he doesn’t have to think about women or sex. For a woman, it means she has a husband to feed and take care of her and her children,” said Sayed Barat Ali Razawi, a Shia mullah in Mazar-i-Sharif. He says the Prophet Muhammad ( Sunni Muslims say this is wrong. “In my opinion contract marriage is just for sex,” says Mullah Azizullah Mofley, a Sunni cleric, insisting the prophet ( But Nader Nadery, from the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission, says the contract marriage is not a way to legitimise sex but an attempt to find a practical solution to difficult circumstances like poverty. “It is not a new trend to overcome a strict moral code,” Nadery says. “It started hundreds of years ago.” In a normal marriage, an Afghan groom must pay a dowry that can be worth anything from 1,000 to several thousand dollars. He then has to pay for the wedding party, which can cost hundreds more. “I waited for five years but no one came to our house to marry me,” says Nazira, whose first husband was killed by the Taliban. “My father was so poor that he couldn’t feed our family. One day a man came to our house and told my father that he wanted to marry me for seven months. My father had heard about contract marriages so he accepted,” she says. Her husband Mohammad Asef, a 38-year-old shopkeeper, learned the custom in Iran, where he had gone to work for a year after his wife died, leaving him with two children. “When I returned to Afghanistan my aunt helped me find this woman,” he says, gesturing to Nazira, with whom he is halfway through a six-month contract. Mohammad is her second contract husband. “Short marriages have a lot of benefits for women whose husbands have died,” she says, as her husband serves customers in the store. “It helps them look after their children better and they don’t need to go out for sex. Also, we don’t have to pay for a wedding party because with a short marriage we just go to a mullah.” She says a regular marriage would have cost them 3,000 dollars. “It is very difficult,” Nazira says. “Where would we find that much money?” |
Posted by:Dan Darling |
#8 Bad idea. There are only two kinds of sex: that which you pay for, and that which is free. The free sex is always more expensive. |
Posted by: Beau 2006-04-22 21:23 |
#7 Agree, tw. IIRC a widow can only marry her dead husband's brother. She can't marry anyone else (damaged goods, dontchknow). |
Posted by: Deacon Blues 2006-04-22 19:37 |
#6 As described in the article, this sounds like a way to get around prohibitively expensive dowry and wedding party costs. Also a way a respectable woman can engage in prostitution to support herself. There are a great many widows in Afghanistan with no salable skills, and a great many poor people. I'm glad those who actually want to wed have found a way. |
Posted by: trailing wife 2006-04-22 19:22 |
#5 That seems rather harsh. But laws is laws. |
Posted by: 6 2006-04-22 18:11 |
#4 I wonder what the Mulllahs think about Ms. Hand fatwa: Fatima Five Fingers: halal Mary Five Fingers: Strictly Haram Bismillah hirRahman nirRahim ..ps: and allah knows best /my Rolaids, where the hell are they? |
Posted by: Mullah RD 2006-04-22 15:56 |
#3 I wonder what the Mulllahs think about Ms. Hand |
Posted by: 6 2006-04-22 13:29 |
#2 Who ends up responsible for the temporary children? I suppose prostitution is a step up from being sold into permanent slavery. Mind you, if the marriage lasts longer than 3 months, then it's simply "shaking up". Which is cheaper. Generally. |
Posted by: Thinemp Whimble2412 2006-04-22 10:10 |
#1 "Temporary marriage" is just prostitution, dressed up in language acceptable to Islam. After all, what serious Muslim man would marry a woman who's not a virgin? |
Posted by: gromky 2006-04-22 05:54 |