#8 Â that's because it's all you ever think about, Zenster.
If you actually paid close attention, you'd realize that I would prefer it immensely if there was some way to avert the huge loss of life such a lamentable event would incur.
This is why I advocate a temporary ban on Islam in nations with freedom of religion until Islamic dominated countries institute similar religious freedoms in theirs. Otherwise, Islam identifies itself as a political ideology and it no longer qualifies as a religion.
This is why I have advocated seeking measures like taking the shrines at Medina and Mecca hostage until there is a cessation of terrorist atrocities. Not that my suggestion is a perfectly workable solution but that it is important for the world to begin examining alternatives that do not involve extermination.
As Wretchard at Belmont Club noted in his superb treatment of the potential for a Muslim nuclear holocaust, "The Three Conjectures" (have you even bothered to read it?), this is the "golden hour" for Islam. Much like the brief 60 minutes a battlefield surgeon has to save the life of a seriously wounded soldier, Islam, knowingly or not, is pushing itself towards the edge of extinction. We are not the ones hurrying them towards such a catastrophe. One terrorist group delivering one single terrorist nuclear attack in America could trigger such a holocaust.
I am concerned about answers, be they peaceful or not is largely up to the Muslims themselves. If they will not or cannot find a path towards peaceful resolution then I shall not waste my time upon seeking one either. That is why you may perceive intolerance upon my part or the "kill 'em all" attitude that I am constantly accused of despite a total lack of evidence to support such a false accusation. |