You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Israel-Palestine-Jordan
U.S. demands Israel reorganize defense export arrangements
2006-02-27
EFL.
Israel will institute a number of comprehensive changes to its defense export arrangements at the insistence of the United States, following the crisis over Israel's export of attack drones to China. The status of several central divisions in the Defense Ministry will be changed, including that of the head of security and the division for assistance and export. A new division will be established in the Defense Ministry, and Foreign Ministry representatives will sit on a supreme advisory council for defense exports. The U.S. administration has been informed of the expected changes.

"The Chinese crisis" caused a rift between Israel and the Pentagon on several levels. A number of contacts were frozen by the Americans, who said Israel could not be trusted in the area of sensitive technological exports, both American and Israeli, which might reach "dangerous addresses." The American delegates expressed their satisfaction with the plans, but said that it remained to be seen how Israel would enact the decisions.

However, Haaretz has learned that the Americans said they expected the Foreign Ministry to have been given a more serious role in supervising Israel's defense exports. The Foreign Ministry, like the Trade, Industry and Labor Ministry, was given a position only on the supreme advisory council that will operate in the new division, and which will deliberate on export to "special" countries like China, Russia, and countries that have any connection to acts of terror. The Americans demanded in the meeting that Venezuela be added to the list of countries Washington considered "problematic" countries and to which defense exports should be limited.

The Foreign Ministry in fact had no part in supervising defense exports, and diplomatic considerations were insufficient. The Foreign Ministry more than once harshly criticized the actions of the Defense Ministry regarding defense exports. A few dozen people will work in the new division, most of whom will come from other divisions. The Public Service Commissioner will be asked to authorize about ten new positions for the new division of defense exports. The division will also be responsible for enforcement of the various regulations.
Posted by:Steve White

#4  I would not mind seeing Israel less confident about its relationship with Uncle Sugar.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-02-27 14:02  

#3  For what it is worth, I have worked with and like the Israelis. In a previous life, I helped them set up their national EW test facility and even received a holiday card and a book in thanks from the MOD. I like and support them, but there are some technologies that we need to control.
Posted by: RWV   2006-02-27 13:54  

#2  Another time to remember that "nations don't have friends, they have only interests." The US has strongly supported Israel. Without the absolute political and military support of the US, Israel would have been overrun in 1973. But this support is not always reciprocated. Remember the sinking of the Liberty in 1967. Plus our friends have always had an active intelligence operation in the US. The Israelis have always been willing to sell any technology to anyone other than the Arabs. Buying US technology from Israel is cheaper than developing or stealing it. China is a big customer. I seriously worry about coordinating missile defense technology with a country who will sell it to our future enemy.
Posted by: RWV   2006-02-27 13:50  

#1  I like the israelis, and I understand their need to make revenue.

They need to get their head around the fact that we are about the only nation on this planet that is currently willing to support them without a gun held to our head. And modify their behavior accordingly.

Selling arms and tech to people that we will prolly fight sooner or later is not going to make the next round of political / economic / military support any easier.
Posted by: N guard   2006-02-27 00:21  

00:00