| Submit your comments on this article |
| India-Pakistan |
| U.S. Navy boards suspected pirate ship in Indian Ocean |
| 2006-02-08 |
| This one's for Pappy, and all the rest of our Navy types. ;-) The United States was striking a pre-emptive blow when it ordered a U.S. Navy destroyer to detain and board a suspected pirate ship in the Indian Ocean last month, aiming to see that terrorists do not lash up with pirates in the Asia-Pacific region. The destroyer, the USS Winston S. Churchill, was ordered to intercept the suspected pirate ship on Jan. 21 after the U.S. Central Command, from its forward headquarters in Bahrain in the Persian Gulf, was contacted by the International Maritime Bureau, based in Malaysia. The maritime bureau monitors piracy all over the world, but especially in Asia. It took the U.S. warship several hours of maneuvering and firing warning shots to get the smaller vessel to surrender. A Navy boarding party then confiscated a cache of small arms to disarm the ship before sending it on its way. "This was a maritime security operation," said a Navy officer informed of events in the Indian Ocean. That effort, broadly defined, includes tracking thousands of ships, much as aircraft are monitored, knowing what cargoes the ships are carrying, driving off pirates when they attack a ship, or recovering the ship if it is seized. For several years, leaders of maritime nations from India and Sri Lanka in South Asia to Singapore and Australia and South Korea and Japan in Northeast Asia have worried that terrorists would seek alliances with pirates, particularly those operating in the South China Sea. Through that sea lane passes more international shipping each year than through the Suez and Panama canals combined. Terrorists who might seize, for instance, a large oil tanker and scuttle the vessel in the Straits of Malacca between Singapore and Indonesia would wreak economic, political, military and environmental havoc. Until now, the U.S. Navy has been reluctant to engage pirates because the service is stretched out with other duties. Asian coastal nations, meanwhile, have said they do not want outside powers, notably the United States, operating in their sovereign waters, where many pirate assaults occur. Many Asian naval officers argue that combating piracy is the job of law enforcement, not navies. Many U.S. Navy officers agree but assert that some Asian nations lack the proper ships -- small, high speed and adequately armed -- to defeat or capture pirates. Moreover, coordination and intelligence sharing among the littoral nations has not been fully developed. The war against terror has led many U.S. Navy officers to the conclusion that their service needs to be involved, if for no other reason to preserve its standing among the U.S. armed forces. Thus, said a Navy officer, "there is no overall policy on going after pirates." Rather, an internal debate seems to be rumbling through the Navy. |
| Posted by:trailing wife |
| #5 If in interantional waters any nations navys bussiness at that. Drum head justice and a quick drop. Forget the "law enforcement" Pirates know whats up. That hadn't changed except in the last century. |
| Posted by: Sock Puppet O´ Doom 2006-02-08 23:02 |
| #4 Many Asian naval officers argue that combating piracy is the job of law enforcement, not navies. Many U.S. Navy officers agree I was always under the impression that streching pirate necks from the yardarm was/is a core competencey of any lawful navy. If they endanger freedom of navigation and commerce on the high seas, they're the navy's buisness. |
| Posted by: N guard 2006-02-08 22:29 |
| #3 Yes, as always the "F" character in the phrase "Yankee Go Home" stands for friendship. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2006-02-08 22:00 |
| #2 Another example of "What have the |
| Posted by: Uleart Spack3244 2006-02-08 21:52 |
| #1 Many Asian naval officers argue that combating piracy is the job of law enforcement, not navies. A convenient paradigm, particulaly if you are supporting the pirates and the denying law enforcement maritime access. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2006-02-08 21:09 |