You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran Demands IAEA Remove All Surveillance Equipment
2006-02-07
Iran told the International Atomic Energy Agency to remove surveillance cameras and agency seals from sites and nuclear equipment by the end of next week, the U.N. watchdog agency said Monday. Iran's demands came two days after the IAEA reported Tehran to the Security Council over its disputed atomic program. The council has the power to impose economic and political sanctions.

In a confidential report to the IAEA's 35-member board, agency head Mohamed ElBaradei said Iran also announced a sharp reduction in the number and kind of inspections IAEA experts will be allowed, effective immediately. The report was dated Monday and made available to The Associated Press.

The moves were expected. Iranian officials had repeatedly warned they would stop honoring the so-called "Additional Protocol" to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty — an agreement giving IAEA inspectors greater inspecting authority — if the IAEA board referred their country to the Security Council.

A diplomat close to the Vienna-based IAEA told the AP that Iran had also made good on another threat — formally setting a date for resuming full-scale work on its uranium enrichment program, which can make either fuel or the nuclear core of warheads.
Posted by:lotp

#9  Nice picture. President A. in his younger days as an Iranian military officer?
Posted by: Secret Master   2006-02-07 17:58  

#8  If I were the IAEA, I'd get my stuff out of there before it gets vaporized.
Posted by: Darrell   2006-02-07 16:32  

#7  send the IAF F-15's
Posted by: Frank G   2006-02-07 16:17  

#6  It is against the teachings of the prophit to allow an infidel to look over a Muslims shoulder.
Allah forbids it.
Posted by: wxjames   2006-02-07 15:59  

#5  Not so much of a removal than a pre-emptive salvage operation.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-02-07 11:44  

#4  It's like calling a brother-in-law to help move furniture.

Better than an soon-to-be ex-wife tossing your stuff on the front lawn and setting it on fire.
Posted by: Steve   2006-02-07 08:58  

#3  
It's like calling a brother-in-law to help move furniture. Excuse for beer and pizza, mostly.
Posted by: Master of Obvious   2006-02-07 07:19  

#2  The NORKS had no problems removing it did they?
Posted by: Sock Puppet O´ Doom   2006-02-07 02:16  

#1  Why can't the remove it themselves?
Do the want to be able to blame their troubles on the IAEA removing the equipment?
Posted by: 3dc   2006-02-07 01:01  

00:00