You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Arabia
Saudi Ambassador "taken aback" by SoTU address
2006-02-06
...and promptly hauls in Steve Hadley for 'discussions'...
Prince Turki al-Faisal, the Saudi ambassador to the United States, on Sunday said he was "taken aback" by President George W. Bush's remark that the United States was "addicted" to Mideast oil, and that the topic continues to be discussed between Saudi and U.S. government officials. Saudi Arabia exports only 15 percent of total U.S. oil imports, al-Faisal noted in a CNN "Late Edition" interview, adding, "I would hardly call that a lot".

Bush made the remark during his State of the Union speech last week, and al-Faisal said he had "a very good meeting" the next day with U.S. national security adviser Stephen Hadley at the White House. "We are talking through that issue --- both governments," al-Faisal said, noting that a joint communique was issued by the U.S. and Saudi Arabia last year, following a meeting in Texas between King Abdullah and Bush in which the leaders agreed on an energy policy that called for increased Saudi oil output for the United States. "This is something that is of serious concern to us because oil is our major income earner," al-Faisal said.
"Like, we could sell sand?"
Posted by:Seafarious

#5  FREE THE EASTERN PENNINSULA!

I'm sure we've got some destitute blacks from Sudan that need their own oil-soaked country...
Posted by: mojo   2006-02-06 15:35  

#4  Squeal? It's nothing! Wait until Iran and Gaza get their due, which I fully expect in the next couple of months. Then the Saudi royals are going to look at the map and the devastation and get serious about terrorism. The three best things that could happen in the near future are (1) for Israel to show the world that it does indeed have nukes by vaporizing some Iranian nuke facilities and (2) for the U.S. to show the world that it is willing to destroy the likes of the Iranian military by air without bothering with a messy follow-up ground operation and (3) for Israel to pulverize Hamas.
Posted by: Darrell   2006-02-06 10:52  

#3  Judging from the size of the squeal from Riyadh, I'd venture that you are correct, rjschwarz. Prince Turki sure didn't waste any time hustling his well-manicured self over to the White House to lodge a Complaint. Apparently somebody was watching the SotU, I guess.
Posted by: Seafarious   2006-02-06 10:29  

#2  I wonder how serious Bush's energy comments were. As the days go by I think it was a threat to the Saudi's. Sort of a stop funding Maddrassas and get the oil flowing or we really will get serious.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2006-02-06 10:23  

#1  SA needs to learn to deal with it. Their already killed their golden goose. We've moved on to the 21st Century. Time for them to put their futures in sand.
Posted by: 2b   2006-02-06 03:05  

00:00