Submit your comments on this article | |||||||||
Britain | |||||||||
Tories condemn Muslim protesters, demand arrests | |||||||||
2006-02-05 | |||||||||
![]() At the height of the protests on Friday demonstrators chanted slogans threatening more London bombings, praising the "magnificent" 9/11 hijackers and waving placards saying "Massacre those who insult Islam", "Europe you will pay" and "Europe you'll come crawling when Mujahideen come roaring". Mr Davis said last night: "Clearly some of these placards are incitement to violence and, indeed, incitement to murder - an extremely serious offence which the police must deal with and deal with quickly. "Whatever your views on these cartoons, we have a tradition of freedom of speech in this country which has to be protected. Certainly there can be no tolerance of incitement to murder." Scotland Yard said a decision not to arrest protesters was taken because of public order fears. It confirmed that police had received more than 100 complaints from the public about the protesters' behaviour.
Yesterday, more than 1,000 demonstrators staged a second protest outside the embassy. The only arrests made were of two men found carrying cartoons of Mohammed. Police said they had been detained "to prevent a breach of the peace".
But the Tories defended the right of editors to publish them. Dominic Grieve, the shadow attorney general, said: "From what we know about the cartoons it is understandable that they have caused offence. However, the decision as to whether to publish or not is one of taste and decency that should rightly be taken by newspaper editors, broadcasters and their owners and is not one for government. Whilst it could be argued that these cartoons were reckless, it is almost certainly the case that they were not intended to stir up hatred." As the clamour for action grew, police sources said there were no arrests on Friday because of fears of a riot. A senior Scotland Yard officer said: "We have to take the overall nature of the protesters into account. If they are overheated and emotional we don't go in.
He said it was entirely possible that "key players" in the protests, some of whom were already known to police, could be pursued by prosecutors.
| |||||||||
Posted by:lotp |
#6 I wonder how long before British Jews are rounded up---cause we all know Jews incite Muslims to violence. |
Posted by: gromgoru 2006-02-05 20:24 |
#5 Democratic governments are supposed to defend freedom. To the death if necessary. Not run away scared in the face of the standard violent muslim backlash against anything that offends their sensibilities. Democratic governments folding in fear. Not a good sign. Objection to muslim violence expressed through caricature is haraam. Objection to cartoons expressed through violence and death threats and looting and burning and killing is accepted and defended. This keeps up, it will result in riots in the streets. Average democratic joe isn't going to take much more of the double standrad. This is thin thin ice we're on. |
Posted by: Hupomoger Clans9827 2006-02-05 11:05 |
#4 Um ... this article was from the BBC. But yes, there does seem to be a pattern here and in Australia. |
Posted by: lotp 2006-02-05 09:15 |
#3 Please Note: I read this artilce online at the Telegraph website last night between 1:30-2:00 am (couldn't sleep). I went to the Telegraph site this morning to link to the artilce. The article is still there, BUT the graph reporting the arrest/detention of the two "counter-protesters" carrying placards with Mohammed's visage has been removed from the body of the article. If you read the article now you'd never know two legitimate protesters had been taken off the street by Scotland Yard "to prevent a breach of the peace". Good work lotp. You captured the article before the thought police censors had a chance to sterilize the report. Disgusting double standard. |
Posted by: Mark Z 2006-02-05 08:42 |
#2 no temp hires from the footbll fans? Jeebus! |
Posted by: Frank G 2006-02-05 01:33 |
#1 The UK needs to hire some new Peelers. No excuses for not making arrests when threats are made. That goes for here in the US and over there in the UK. Terrorist threats are terrorist threats and need to have teh full weight of the law applies to them some of that is the weight of a well practiced riot squad with hard rubber battons. |
Posted by: Sock Puppet O´ Doom 2006-02-05 01:09 |