You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Army Teaches Troops How to Pick a Spouse
2006-02-04
They are the Pentagon's new "rules of engagement" — the diamond ring kind. U.S. Army chaplains are trying to teach troops how to pick the right spouse, through a program called "How To Avoid Marrying a Jerk."

The matchmaking advice comes as military family life is being stressed by two tough wars. Defense Department records show more than 56,000 in the Army — active, National Guard and Reserve — have divorced since the campaign in Afghanistan started in 2001. Officials partly blame long and repeated deployments which started after the invasion of Iraq in 2003 and stretched the service thin.

Troops also are coming home with life-altering injuries.

Many come back better people, others worse-off — but either way, very changed from who they were when they wed. "Being in the military certainly raises the stakes when you choose a mate," said Lt. Col. Peter Frederich, head of family issues in the Pentagon's chaplain office.

The "no jerks" program is also called "P.I.C.K. a Partner," for Premarital Interpersonal Choices and Knowledge. It advises the marriage-bound to study a partner's F.A.C.E.S. — family background, attitudes, compatibility, experiences in previous relationships and skills they'd bring to the union.

It teaches the lovestruck to pace themselves with a R.A.M. chart — the Relationship Attachment Model — which basically says don't let your sexual involvement exceed your level of commitment or level of knowledge about the other person.
Goes against everything I knew when I was 17 but what the heck.
Maj. John Kegley, a chaplain who teaches the program in Monterey, Calif., throws in the "no jerk salute" for fun. One hand at the heart, two-fingers at the brow mean use your heart and brain when choosing.

Though the acronyms and salute make it sound like something the Pentagon would come up with, the program was created by former minister John Van Epp of Ohio, who has a doctorate in psychology and a private counseling practice. He teaches it to Army chaplains, who in turn teach it to troops. It also is used by social service agencies, prisons, churches and other civilian groups.

Commanders once discouraged troops from starting a family while serving. Thus the old saying: "If the Army wanted you to have a wife, it would have issued you one." Today, the military supports families more than any other employer, Frederich said.

The Bush administration proposes to spend $5.6 billion in the next budget year for quality-of-life services for troops and their families. That includes help with child care, education, spouse job hunting, legal assistance, commissaries, relocation counseling — programs on every family issue imaginable — to promote stability, and thus troop readiness.

Some 740,000 people — or a little more than half of all troops in the active-duty armed forces — are married. Of those, some 96,000 had spouses also in uniform in the 2004 budget year, according to Pentagon figures.

Such support notwithstanding, "not everybody is cut out" to marry into the military, said Army spokeswoman Martha Rudd.

The Army hopes the "no jerks" program will help couples decide if they are ready for a long-term commitment and can cope with the unique stresses of military life. "Settings like military bases are incubators," said Van Epp, of Medina, Ohio. "They try to hatch ... relationships extremely fast," leading to higher divorce rates and more domestic violence.

The program teaches troops not to cave in to the pressure of a ticking clock — like rushing to marry before shipping out for a deployment, or too soon after homecoming.
Posted by:Anonymoose

#16  Yes, it does take a very special person to be the trailing spouse in a military marriage. It's not something I could handle -- I'm only just brave enough to handle being married to a civilian who can tell me where he's going to, and possibly when he'll come back. Oldspook, Cyber Sarge, you are to be congratulated on catching such a rarity; may your next 25 be even better than what came before. ;-)
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-02-04 22:20  

#15  Doesn't West Point have a seminiar on this?

Cadets called it "holes and poles," but methinks that you knew that already, 6. BTW, the catalogue name was Marriage and Family Life.
Posted by: 11A5S   2006-02-04 18:59  

#14  location, location, location. »;-)
Posted by: RD   2006-02-04 18:36  

#13  .com's pic reminds me of a similar cartoon, of a tall, buxom woman and a very short doctor, and the woman is saying, "a gynecologist? Whatever made you decide to become a gynecologist?"
Posted by: Steve White   2006-02-04 18:04  

#12  Can't fight pheromones.
Posted by: .com   2006-02-04 17:53  

#11  Old fashioned way worked for me:


Both of us NCOs in Intel billets stationed overseas. Lots of booze in me and even more for her. Married a few weeks later. Like a "tech school" marriage.

Thats was almost a quarter of a century ago, and we've manage to hang on in spite of some of the wilder rides I've been on where I coudlnt tell her where I was, what I was doing, and when (or even if) I'd be back. Her having been "in the business" is what made it all possible, that and having a world of patience.
Posted by: Oldspook   2006-02-04 16:18  

#10  "How To Avoid Marrying a Jerk."

crap. this is gonna cut into my dating
Posted by: Frank G   2006-02-04 13:32  

#9  I remember a young couple, she E2 and he SP4, who had wild sex for two weeks before deciding to get married, and with a real "us vs. the world" attitude.

He was a good SP4, and I knew she was crazy as a bedbug, so I volunteered to give them some of the questions they would be asked during the "mandatory military pre-marriage counseling" (bullshit, bullshit).

I said, Oh, don't tell me your answers. I just want to give you the questions *they* will ask, so you can think about them.

Well, I gave them some softball questions, like "where do you plan to live", and "who will cook?", and their eyes had that rigid, unpersuadeable set in them. But then I mentioned kids, to which they blurted out, "Oh, they'll come when they come."

And I knew I had them.

After that, though her eyes were still fixed, his kept darting off, the thick grease around his brain gears starting to loosen up a little. After a few more easy questions, I wished them the best at their counseling and to have a nice day.

Their argument started almost as soon as they left the room. Within a few days the SP4 announced they had broken up, and he was damn glad, because she was "one crazy bitch".
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-02-04 12:59  

#8  Not to mention all the marriages solely for the purpose of getting BAQ and moving out of the barracks.

lot of what we called "Tech School Marriages".

I had one female maintenance tech (Air Force) who married a Marine at tech school and couldn't understand why she couldn't get a joint spouse assignment to be with him. She turned out to be full blown nut case, got booted out.
Posted by: steve   2006-02-04 11:28  

#7  There used to be a lot of what we called "Tech School Marriages". Kids would marry someone they barely knew during their brief technical training program. I can't say all, but most of those marriages I knew of didn't last past the first enlistment. They usuually ended when they were sent to different assignements based on the needs of the service. Marrying a civilian may be worse because they don't or won't understand why your first assignment is to say Thule Greenland and your spouse can't come with. As a confession here, I did meet my wife in Tech School but we married a year afterwards and have been together for 24 years, but we are the exception and not the rule.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2006-02-04 11:14  

#6  Since the most important decision a person will make in their entire life is choosing a mate, I'm glad to see that the military is beginning to deliver some much needed advice on the subject. There's little worse for a deployed serviceman than to be desperately worried about a flaky/philandering spouse back home, particularly if children are involved. Productivity and engagement drop dramatically for the deployed spouse when it starts; when they find out something's really wrong back home, things go to hell in a handbasket. Carefully picking someone who can stand up to the strains of military married life is a prerequisite for a successful military career because, truth be told, there aren't that many folks in our society who are up to facing those challenges. Military members DO need to be very selective for just that reason.
Posted by: mac   2006-02-04 11:08  

#5  "Settings like military bases are incubators," said Van Epp, of Medina, Ohio. "They try to hatch ... relationships extremely fast," leading to higher divorce rates and more domestic violence.

That makes sense. Sounds like a good program to me.
Posted by: 2b   2006-02-04 10:43  

#4  6 - yes, I believe so.
Posted by: lotp   2006-02-04 10:28  

#3  ...through a program called "How To Avoid Marrying a Jerk."

There, fixed it for ya...
Posted by: Raj   2006-02-04 10:13  

#2  Doesn't West Point have a seminiar on this?
Posted by: 6   2006-02-04 09:55  

#1  "Settings like military bases are incubators," said Van Epp, of Medina, Ohio. "They try to hatch ... relationships extremely fast," leading to higher divorce rates and more domestic violence.

And the proof of this statment is? When I was in Korea, I was advised that the divorce rate among military personnel and local nationals was about 50%. Wow! However, at the time, the divorce rate among Americans in general was about 50%. GeeWhiz.

So show us the numbers to back the claim that there is a significant difference between military marriages and non-military marriages of the same socio-economic/geographical/age groups. Or is this another media based bias? You know the one that only the losers join the military. Therefore they're all Springer folks.
Posted by: Ebbavins Flemp6662   2006-02-04 09:45  

00:00