You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Afghans, U.S. Troops Battle Insurgents
2006-02-03
Fierce fighting involving U.S. warplanes and Afghan troops in southern Afghanistan left at least six Taliban rebels and three police dead, officials said Friday. Ghulam Muhiddin, the chief of administration in southern Helmand province, said 100 Afghan police and army troops were hunting dozens of militants in Sangin district, and U.S. planes had bombed the area. "Right now we have got six dead bodies of Taliban. We are expecting there will be a lot more dead bodies," he told The Associated Press. He said 13 Afghan forces were wounded, four seriously. He said four Taliban were wounded, and two of them had been arrested.

Fighting began Thursday when police were deployed to the Haji Fateh area to hunt for Taliban rebels hiding there, Muhiddin said. Local police chief Abraham Jan said the fighting started after insurgents ambushed a police convoy. Clashes intensified Friday as Afghan army forces joined a search operation against the militants, with U.S. support. A U.S. military spokesman, Lt. Col. Jerry O'Hara, said American forces, including A-10 war planes, responded to an initial attack on Afghan security forces by up to 30 militants. He said there were no reports of casualties among the U.S. troops, and that the fighting was ongoing.
Posted by:ed

#9  Rumor has it that the Army stepped forward to take the A-10 when the Air Force tried to drop it. The AF got real interested in the A-10 again as they didn't want fixed wing Army units.
That's what I heard anyway.
Posted by: whitecollar redneck   2006-02-03 18:50  

#8  And that is in spite of the fact that AF generals have been trying for a decade to scrap it so they can buy more $140 million per copy F22's.
Posted by: anymouse   2006-02-03 12:30  

#7  I understand that the A-10's are getting new engines and new sensor systems.
Posted by: Phil   2006-02-03 11:08  

#6  Nope. The A-10 was slated for the scrapheap, but the wars in Iraq and Afganistan have kept it around since it is perfect for this type of war. The A-10 rocks.
Anonymoose, I know the feeling. I watched live fires of it too. Definately don't want to be on the receiving end of it.
Posted by: mmurray821   2006-02-03 10:52  

#5  Funny, but I don't recall the Taliban ever being called "insurgents" before.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2006-02-03 09:44  

#4  FYI: My unit was attacked by an A-10 in a training exercise once. I was about a half-mile away at the time and got a good vantage of the attack. It makes you a little queasy to realize, even in training, that you are the "sole survivor".
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-02-03 08:46  

#3  The unfortunate situation the bad guyz now find themselves in is that they *have* to concentrate their numbers, having to bully the locals, who would be more than glad to inform on them or kill them outright.

However, this also means that whenever we find such a concentration, we can cull the whole herd at once.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-02-03 08:44  

#2  Hasn't the AF gotten rid of the A-10 yet?
Posted by: Sleans Shereck7375   2006-02-03 08:42  

#1  20 Taliban deaders and counting. 3 Afghan police dead.
Posted by: ed   2006-02-03 08:31  

00:00