You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
One Size of Armor Does Not Suit All
2006-01-26
January 26, 2006: Personal armor for troops in Iraq is in the headlines once more. Side armor, which adds about ten pounds to the 16 pound weight of the Interceptor Protective Vest, has been available since 2003 (when 250 sets were sent to Iraq.) About a thousand sets were delivered in 2004, and more last year. Side armor is obviously not new, as many news stories imply. While the side armor provided useful protection, the added weight (for a trooper already carrying over fifty pounds), and restricts movement. The new armor is most popular with troops guarding convoys. They spend most of their time sitting down, and the side armor provides additional protection from roadside bombs, which throw out a lot of fragments, at troops sitting facing forward. The bombs are often accompanied by an ambush force armed with machine-guns and assault rifles. Sometimes, the troops have to get out of their vehicles and battle the ambushers. This is often intense and disorganized combat, with fire coming from all directions. Again, the side armor can be very useful, and the troops wonÂ’t be running around so long that the additional weight and movement restriction will become a major problem. For the same reason, combat troops that are spending most of their time in their vehicles, donÂ’t mind the disadvantages of the side armor. But infantry that are spending a lot of time running around, up stairs and battling the enemy in an urban environment, nimbleness is more important. Some of these guys have been known to leave the back plate out, just to save a few pounds.

These different attitudes towards how much armor to wear are similar to those found in police forces. That's why the police have both lightweight armor (worn by most cops, most of the time) and heavier rigs for SWAT teams or anyone out on a raid, and even heavier getup for bomb disposal personnel.
I've noticed the guy who developed the "Predator" facial armor system is getting a lot of play in the media. Is it me, or does it look an awful lot like a Star Wars Storm Trooper helmet?
Posted by:Steve

#4  Remember, in the military they make everything in just 2 sizes: too big and too small. It's specified right there in the contract.

As for the face shield--Maybe for the turret gunner/TC. too bulky and heavy otherwise.
Posted by: N guard   2006-01-26 18:58  

#3  The mask looks pretty restricitve and bulky. I don't know about the armor our guys are wearing because it has lots of ceramic materials but my soft body armor (thrreat level 3) was fitted and made for me. (400+ dollars at time of purchase). It's bulky but soft. I have side protection which part of the vest. Fitted body armor has to be better than off the rack stuff. It's really cheap insurance for the user.
Posted by: Sock Puppet O´ Doom   2006-01-26 16:03  

#2  Looks bulky but face shots and upper neck shots are the main target for snipers lately at least the ones getting kills. Thing really looks heavy but the benefits could outweigh.
Posted by: C-Low   2006-01-26 10:30  

#1  The concept isn't much different than the 7th century Sutton Hoo helmet. Just add all that modern molding material and a streamlined design. Bullets and explosive debris move with a little more umph than the old sword or axe.
Posted by: Thinegum Elmugum5135   2006-01-26 09:35  

00:00