You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Terror Networks
Interpreting the Koran
2006-01-25
January 25, 2006: Many counter-terrorism operators are becoming expert in the complexities of Islamic theology. Partly, this is due to there being over fifty different sects in Islam. Only a few of these sects back Islamic terrorism. ItÂ’s well known that the Wahhabi sect, from Saudi Arabia, is one of the most conservative and intolerant forms of Islam. What is less well known is that there are several different versions of the Islamic scriptures, the Koran, in circulation. Some of them are more conducive to aggression and terrorism than others. The original version of the Koran, created in the early days of the Prophet MohammedÂ’s religious life, was a lot mellower than any subsequent version. Once Islam began to spread rapidly, often via the use of force, another version of the Koran appeared, one that was more agreeable to the use of violence in spreading Islam, and dealing with non-believers (infidels).

Things got worse in the 18th century, when the Wahhabis revised interpretations of the Koran to incorporate more inflammatory and violent examples of what Allah intended for the faithful to do while spreading the faith and dealing with infidels. The rhetoric got jacked up still more in the 1920s, when social critic, and Islamic radical, Sayyid Qutb tweaked the scripture once more. The Wahhabis admired QutbÂ’s work. Unfortunately for the Egyptian Qutb, his countrymen did not, and he was condemned to death in 1966. But by then, the Wahhabis were the beneficiaries of a growing flood of oil money. If was considered virtuous for wealthy Saudis to contribute to religious charities, nearly all of them run by Wahhabis. Much of the money was used to establish pro-Wahhabi mosques overseas, run by clerics who could be trusted to preach the Koran as followers of Wahhab and Qutb saw it. This went largely unnoticed in the West until the 1990s. The full import of this bloodthirsty version of Islam became apparent to even the slow learners on September 11, 2001.

While Wahhabi Islam may not be very tolerant, most other sects are. Counter-terrorism efforts are now directed towards convincing the majority of Moslems, those who donÂ’t subscribe to Wahhabism, to openly condemn this pro-terrorist movement. This approach is having increasing success. Even many Saudis are having second thoughts about blindly following Wahhabi interpretations of the Koran. The true face of Islamic terrorism is losing whatever luster it ever had, and many Moslems are seeing the connection between the murderous violence, and the hate filled theology of Qutb and the Wahhabis.
Posted by:Steve

#10  You simply can't blame all this on the Wahhabis.

Hey, we can try. It's not as if they are totally undeserving of blame and if ever there was a particular body of flaming @ssholes to make an example out of, it would be them.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-01-25 22:36  

#9  could've sworn Mo's word was untranscribable in other than his original meaning and word, according to Allan and the Imam du jour. Infidels!
Posted by: Frank G   2006-01-25 21:07  

#8  The Ismaili (a Shia splinter group dating from early in Islam) and the Ahmadiyya (fairly recent Sufi splinter group which also incorporates a bit of hinduism and bits of other stuff) come pretty close to being non violent.

Posted by: mhw   2006-01-25 21:02  

#7  Google "Sufi" and "jihad" and you'll find a surfeit of good information. It looks like Sufism may well be a mystical version of Sunni Islam, but violent jihad against non-Muslims is central to that mysticism. And, "humiliation of the kufr is the honour of Islam," according to one of Sufism's main theologians.
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-01-25 20:10  

#6  You simply can't blame all this on the Wahhabis.

What mhw said.

Even the Sufis (loved by LLLs as peaceful, touchy-feely mystics) had their jihad killing spree. I don't have time right now, but I'll try to dig up a link to corroborate.
Posted by: Xbalanke   2006-01-25 16:25  

#5  So many have written about their hopes for an Islamic Reformation. It's already happening, unfortunately, the Wahhabis are leading it.
Posted by: Whutch Threth6418   2006-01-25 16:21  

#4  the wahabbis claim, not without reason, that they are reclaiming Mohammud's message from the corrupted other sects

in that sense, wahabi was Martin Luther
Posted by: mhw   2006-01-25 15:42  

#3  If God selected Mohammad to be his final messenger, then who are these people that have changed God's message? Infidels or worse?
Posted by: GK   2006-01-25 14:20  

#2  While the Wahhabis are the widest source of Islamoterrorism today they are not the only source.

The Shia in Iran terrorize Christians, bahai and sunnis.

Non wahabbi (although Salafist) sunnis are responsible for the massacres in Dafar and were responsible for the east Timor massacres and the Armenian massacres.

And of course the worst of such massacres were the 8 centuries of Jihad against Hindus and Bhuddists in south Asia.

You simply can't blame all this on the Wahhabis.
Posted by: mhw   2006-01-25 11:54  

#1  And the clock continues to tick.
Posted by: Crusader   2006-01-25 11:06  

00:00