You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
More Red-on-Red in Ramadi
2006-01-24
BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraqi nationalist rebels in the Sunni Arab city of Ramadi have turned against their former al Qaeda allies after a bomb attack this month killed 80 people, sparking tit-for-tat assassinations. Residents told Reuters on Monday at least three prominent figures on both sides were among those killed after local insurgent groups formed an alliance against al Qaeda, blaming it for massacring police recruits in Ramadi on January 5.

"There was a meeting right after the bombings," one Ramadi resident familiar with the events said. "Tribal leaders and political figures gathered to form the Anbar Revolutionaries to fight al Qaeda in Anbar and force them to leave the province. "Since then there has been all-out war between them," said the resident in the capital of the sprawling western desert province of Anbar, speaking anonymously for fear of reprisals.

Local Iraqi officials confirmed residents' accounts of events but declined to comment publicly.
Not quite knowing on which side their bread is buttered.
The bloodshed is the latest example of a trend U.S. military commanders and diplomats have been pointing to optimistically in recent months as a sign that some militants may be ready to pursue negotiable demands through the new Sunni Arab engagement in parliament after taking part in last month's election.

On Thursday, three local Islamist groups around Ramadi -- the 1920 Brigades, the Mujahideen Army and the Islamic Movement for Iraq's Mujahideen -- also met to distance themselves from their fellow Islamists in Qaeda, joining the shift against al Qaeda led by more secular, tribal and nationalist groups.
"I mean, we know we're a little crazy, but dem boyz is nuts!"
The pan-Arab Al Hayat newspaper quoted a statement from six Iraqi armed groups on Monday announcing they had united to form the "People's Cell" to confront Zarqawi and preserve security in the Anbar province. The statement condemned "armed operations which target innocents" and affirmed "a halt to cooperation with al Qaeda."

Both sides have distributed leaflets in the city of half a million claiming killings of opponents."Qaeda announces the killing of someone in the Revolutionaries and then the others announce they have killed someone in Qaeda," the resident said.
Perhaps you guys should have a 2-for-1 sale?
Another resident following events closely said: "The conflict is now clear between the militant groups and al Qaeda; the Anbar Revolutionaries who were formed after the attacks say they want to eliminate al Qaeda from Anbar."
Posted by:Steve White

#9  Tell that to Rightwing, Pappy. It's his idea.
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-01-24 21:35  

#8  Iraqi Liberal Capitalism.
In the words of All American Bowl Turner....
Sometimes you gotta fake it, till yu make it.
If the US/Coalition can keep enough troops to force the Iraqi's to pretend to be normal perhaps it will rub off.


Posted by: 6   2006-01-24 19:28  

#7  It's that old 'at least the trains ran on time' nostalgia, tw. Never mind that the old Iraqi Baathist government was quite comfortable being in bed with religious extremists and terrorists. Or that the Syrian Baathists are cozying up to the Iranian mullahs. It's the 'Secularism' that counts.
Posted by: Pappy   2006-01-24 18:59  

#6  The difference between a moderate Baath gov't and Saddam Hussein's Baath gov't is the number of people who disappear in the night. Not an acceptable outcome. The secularists need to keep telling tales of Taliban excesses, so that the Iraqis understand that the battle isn't between Secular Fascist and Islamist, but between moderates of all beliefs and extremists. I think it is coming, though, as the Sunni and Shiite leaders horsetrade to set up the new government, and see the extremists continue to blow people up.
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-01-24 13:47  

#5  The bottom line is Iraq needs Secular government. The Al Qaeda's, radical Sunni's and Sadr supporters are all dangerous. Alawi had the best formula and he's out. I hate to say but a return to a moderate Baath Style goverment may be the best approach. Also, Kurdish independence is probably not a bad idea.
Posted by: Rightwing   2006-01-24 12:17  

#4  Ptah - heh, you're such a tease...

It's a POV thingy. From ours, it's asshat A or asshat B. From theirs, it's anarchy vs civilization... For an Arab asshat, that's a toughie.
Posted by: .com   2006-01-24 09:38  

#3  They kill Z, the reward money goes into the city coffers for improvments...
Posted by: Ptah   2006-01-24 08:09  

#2  Well, this is certainly a win/win for us anyway. The more Al-Q die at the hands of the Sunnis, the better; the more Sunni/Baathist die at the hand of Al-Q, the better. The only party that is kind of stuck in the middle is the local Iraqi population; and this can end in a mess for the local Iraqi police/military, since if the Sunni/Baathist do win, they gain political clout.
Posted by: Shieldwolf   2006-01-24 03:10  

#1  Boyz and Girlz, I believe this could be viewed as good news for all parties involved except one, Al Qaeda.
Posted by: Long Hair Republican   2006-01-24 00:18  

00:00