Submit your comments on this article |
Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
Iran warns West over UN referral |
2006-01-23 |
![]() In an interview with the Financial Times, Iran's chief nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani urged the European Union to reopen talks which stalled after Tehran broke UN seals on uranium enrichment equipment. "If the negotiating route is open, we prefer to reach a conclusion through talks," Mr Larijani told the newspaper. "But if this route is closed, we are obliged to follow up our other scenario. Everything depends on the way we are treated." Asked if there was a timescale for uranium enrichment on an industrial scale, he said: "Yes. We have a plan for resumption. "If we are referred to the Security Council, the government is obliged ... to lift all voluntary measures." Last month, Moscow proposed setting up a joint venture with Iran that would enrich uranium on Russian soil for Iran's planned nuclear reactors. Mr Larijani said no decision had been made on the Russian proposal. "It is one we can study," he told the FT in a report on its website. "This proposal, however, has to be completed. There are some points which should be reconsidered in a more comprehensive plan." |
Posted by:tipper |
#12 President Ahmageddonouddahere (ht Steyn) says, "We're ramping up our separation program, and if you refer us to the UNSC, we're gonna ramp up our separation program." |
Posted by: KBK 2006-01-23 12:14 |
#11 Your right DG, a covert attack would be the most likely attack. But it would take us months to identify who sent it. If they used black market materials it could be months before we could run it down to show it was sent by Iran giving him time to be the Islamic hero and rally for the big jihad. |
Posted by: 49 Pan 2006-01-23 11:54 |
#10 Treat 'em as a target. |
Posted by: mojo 2006-01-23 11:40 |
#9 "Just as soon as he feels he can strike and not be destroyed in the process he will." There is no possible âovert-strikeâ scenario that wouldnât result in an immediate and overwhelming retaliation? Even Ahmadinejadsâ most twisted logic canât refute that certainty. If Teheran strikes it will be covert, by proxies, or justified by way of the "Twelfth Imam" bullshit. |
Posted by: DepotGuy 2006-01-23 11:01 |
#8 A little suprised Israel did'nt take out Iran's president when he was in Damascus. Could of killed two birds with one stone. |
Posted by: plainslow 2006-01-23 09:57 |
#7 Iran is active in its efforts to destroy Israel. They are the father of Hamas and support Hezbullah. The money and training they provide are witnessed every day in Israel in the form of bombings and other attacks. This ass has been at war with US and Israel since 1979, his fights have gone from an embassy take down with hostages to active support for terrorist actions. The nuclear threat is just the next phase of his desire to destroy the US and Israel. If anyone thinks he wonât use nukes as soon as he thinks he can is very mistaken. Just as soon as he feels he can strike and not be destroyed in the process he will. My bet is he wonât wait until he has a functioning nuke, he will be satisfied with a dirty bomb in order to make the land uninhabitable for ever. |
Posted by: 49 Pan 2006-01-23 08:11 |
#6 This thing is gonna get ugly. The worst thing about Iran's preasident Whatsisname, is he's a short weasel. Short men who gain power are often lunatics with abundant hatred pent up inside their viscious personalities. Gonna get ugly. |
Posted by: wxjames 2006-01-23 07:48 |
#5 They sure are agitated over any interruption to their "peaceful" nuclear program, aren't they? |
Posted by: Desert Blondie 2006-01-23 06:58 |
#4 Check out this Nazi, funky soul brothers: http://static.flickr.com/36/89610889_1f49967fe2.jpg |
Posted by: CaziFarkus 2006-01-23 06:35 |
#3 Iranian Mulah EXPLICTLY THREATENS US forces in Iraq with EXTERMINATION. |
Posted by: 3dc 2006-01-23 02:25 |
#2 The picture is bleak. Any way you look at it people are bound to die. The choice is how many and what religion or ideology with they subscribe too? Talking isn't going to save a single soul. The Political/Religious leadership of Iran is intractable. |
Posted by: Sock Puppet O´ Doom 2006-01-23 02:07 |
#1 Damn it: The Problem of Iran Katzman paints a really really bleak picture. Tell me there is a better one. |
Posted by: 3dc 2006-01-23 01:56 |