You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Report says Britain doubts legality of CIA flights
2006-01-19
LONDON - Britain believes the CIA’s reported secret transfer of terrorism suspects to foreign countries for interrogation is illegal, according to a leaked government document published on Thursday. The Foreign Office memo says the practice, known as extraordinary rendition, “could never be legal” if the detainee is at risk of torture, according to extracts printed in the Guardian newspaper. It adds that British cooperation “would also be illegal if we knew of the circumstances”, according to the newspaper.

Britain, a key US ally, has repeatedly sought to play down its role in the rendition controversy. Foreign Secretary Jack Straw told parliament on Jan. 10 that Britain has approved only two CIA rendition flights. However, the leaked document, dated Dec. 7, 2005, says the CIA may have used British airports more often. “The papers we have uncovered so far suggest that there could be more than the two cases referred to in the House (of Commons) by the foreign secretary,” the BBC News Web site quoted from an extract of the memo.

It was sent by an official in Straw’s department to an aide in Prime Minister Tony Blair’s office, the Guardian said. It was leaked to the New Statesman magazine and parts were reprinted in several British newspapers on Thursday.

The briefing document’s author, named as Irfan Siddiq, appears to suggest the British government should seek to sidestep difficult questions over its role in the renditions. “We should try to avoid getting drawn on detail and to try to move the debate on,” he wrote, according to the newspaper.”

A spokesman for Blair declined to comment. A Foreign Office spokesman had no direct comment. “The government does not deport or extradite anyone to another state where there are substantive grounds to believe they would be subject to torture,” he said in a statement.
Posted by:Steve White

#2  It's amazing how rumour and hearsay can help the leftist press perpetuate a story ad infinitum. BBC Radio 4's The Today programme just cannot shut up about this.

Question: How many USAF bases are there in Britain? Another question: Would the US really need to use civilian airports to shunt these shitbags around the globe?

This story will not be in the news tomorrow... but will be back next Wednesday when the left experience a quiet day for Anti-American news stories. NEXT...
Posted by: Howard UK   2006-01-19 08:29  

#1  *yawn*
Its the Guardian , what does anyone expect .. Sympathy for the war on terror , or sympathy for terrorists insurgents

When will they learn , its a war , not a frikkin parking ticket violation
Posted by: MacNails   2006-01-19 06:04  

00:00