You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Gore launches stemwinder over NSA program
2006-01-17
.com, we need that fire-breathing pic again.
The former vice-president Al Gore launched a withering attack on the White House yesterday for authorising wiretaps without court oversight, and accused President George Bush of repeatedly breaking the law. The strongly worded speech makes Mr Gore the most prominent political figure in America to weigh in on the wiretapping scandal.
That's not true, lots of nutty Dems have whinged on over this.
Mr Gore, who lost the 2000 election to Mr Bush following the intervention of the supreme court, also went further than other Democratic critics in accusing the president of wrongdoing. Mr Gore said yesterday that the decision to bypass the courts was part of a pattern of behaviour from the Bush administration of "indifference" to the constitution.
To be distinguished from trying to get the Florida courts to steal the election for you, Al?
"We still have much to learn about the NSA's domestic surveillance. What we do know about this pervasive wiretapping virtually compels the conclusion that the president of the United States has been breaking the law repeatedly and insistently," Mr Gore said in a speech delivered to mark Martin Luther King day.
I guess if you repeat the assertion often enough it's true, so long as you're a Democrat.
"A president who breaks the law is a threat to the very structure of our government," he said.
One could make a carefully-constructed argument about wiretapping and the need to distinguish tapping the communications of terrorists versus tapping those of ordinary Americans. One could argue that a firewall is needed between the two, and that the President's actions, though well intentioned, were eroding that firewall. To make that argument stick, one would would need to present it in as calm and dispassionate manner as possible, rising about ordinary politics to be an erudite senior statesman.

Instead, the Dems trot out good old Al, the latest in a series of fire-breathing, screaming Dhimmis. This effort may play to the Kos kiddies, but average Americans have already switched them off. What distinguishes Al's rant from that of John Conyers, or Jay Rockefeller, or Nancy Pelosi? It's all blubbering, screaming bile. Who wants to listen to that?
In yesterday's speech, Mr Gore also called for an independent counsel to investigate the secret wiretap programme.
Oh yasss, we couldn't possibly figure this out without an independent counsel. Or two. Or three.
He ranked the operation with other controversial decisions by the administration in the war on terror, including its holding of "enemy combatants" indefinitely without trial, and its justification of harsh interrogation techniques. "The disrespect embodied in these apparent mass violations of the law is part of a larger pattern of seeming indifference to the constitution that is deeply troubling to millions of Americans in both political parties," he said.

Mr Bush insists that he acted within the law and that Congress implicitly authorised the eavesdropping when it allowed the use of force in response to the 9/11 terror attacks. However, yesterday's broadside from Mr Gore increases the pressure on the White House to offer a fuller explanation of its decisions.
Only in the minds of al Guardian.
The Senate judiciary committee plans to hold hearings next month into the legality of the NSA eavesdropping, and the Republican chairman, Arlen Specter, has indicated that he is sceptical of the Bush administration's assertions that it acted within the law.
Even Specter misunderestimates Bush. Arlen's going to look pretty stoopid when Bush details just how well the program was vetted and reviewed by lots of Democrats, and how concerns were addressed in a timely way.
Posted by:Steve White

#15  Big Al is now certifiably insane. Would like to see him kick off the committee hearing...
Posted by: Inspector Clueso   2006-01-17 19:49  

#14  Nope, "aura". It's a side effect of the reality distortion field.
Posted by: DMFD   2006-01-17 19:31  

#13  stench, not aura
Posted by: Frank G   2006-01-17 17:31  

#12  I'm waiting for him to start talking about the aura that surrounded him when talking.
Posted by: Xbalanke   2006-01-17 16:44  

#11  To hell with that! He's on his way to replacing this guy.
Posted by: Secret Master   2006-01-17 16:13  

#10  Gore wants to replace Stassen as the common election bafoon.
Posted by: 3dc   2006-01-17 12:16  

#9  Actually, I'd love both Al Gore and John Kerry to challenge the Hilldebeast in mid 2007 for 2008.

The only things saving the Dems from a 400+ electoral college defeat are:

- most voters don't pay attention to politics until the year before the Prez election and thus don't know how insane the Dems have become

- the MSM agiprop machine can still deliver about 5-10% of the vote to the Dems

- the felon, illegal immigrant and deceased vote is about another 1% of the dem vote
Posted by: mhw   2006-01-17 10:34  

#8  Not too long ago I was totally against holding hearings about NSA and other issues, but now I say “ Full steam ahead.” Hold it in the Judiciary committee and subpoena every left-wing nut ball from around the globe. Given their recent show during the Alito hearings I know the Democrats would rise to the occasion. Imagine if you will a full-fledged circus every day in the Senate and every evening the Democrat leaders have to disavow every screwball conspiracy that was testified to during the day. Jon Stewart would have to make his show an hour long just to keep up with the material! Have these hearings (rants) continue through the election cycle and I doubt there would be many voters that would trust the Democrats with anything above trash collector. Just my two cents and a suggestion to the dark overlord (Rove).
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2006-01-17 10:20  

#7  I guess he forgot all about his former support for the Clipper chip.
Posted by: Desert Blondie   2006-01-17 09:54  

#6  Bush should've drank large amounts of ice tea and been in the can taking a leak when decisions like these were made. I think that was somebody else's excuse awhile back.
Posted by: tu3031   2006-01-17 09:16  

#5  There was no controlling authority, as I recall Gorebot's own words.
Posted by: eLarson   2006-01-17 09:08  

#4  "A president who breaks the law is a threat to the very structure of our government," he said.

Huh.

I seem to recall Gore stood beside Clinton despite Clinton's having been proven to have broken the law. That Gore stayed in an administration that used the IRS to punish critics, wiretapped political rivals, and went through their FBI files. That Gore himself wanted to be president despite his own role in raising bribes campaign funds from foreign powers.

What an ass.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2006-01-17 08:13  

#3  Problem is simple, he thinks he's still relevant.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2006-01-17 07:53  

#2  
Posted by: Dhimmisquat   2006-01-17 07:37  

#1  CHarles Krauthammer on FNC said it dead on, i.e. that most Americans understand that America's survival and identity is at stake, and they are more than willing to tolerate Dubya's and the NSA's actions iff it means victory andor security over an enemy. Krauthammer also made the point that during WW2, the Govt's interventions/restrictions ags individual rights were far more intrusive and pervasive than today's WOT, and that FEW IFF ANY AMER POLS OR VOTERS EVER COMPLAINED ABOUT ANYTHING - e.g. putting Japanese in relocation camps after Pearl Harbor, or the Army executing Nazi saboteurs without civilian habeas corpus!? Amers in both WW1 and WW2 put up with martial laws,nationwide drafts of young men, limitations of civil rights, and universal consumer shortages, etc. because America was at war and Americans wanted to win the war(s). In legend, wid the MANHATTAN PROJECT Amer corporations pledged to build any and all the necessary facilities and components for nuke bombs for the total sum profit of ONE US DOLLAR. The Dems got nuthin' now except waiting for American Hiroshimas/new 9-11's and pretending vv the MSM that 9-11 was about ONLY Radical Islam, NOT saving and forcing knowingly failed anti-US American Socialism and anti-US OWG/SWO on an unsuspecting America, where Saving America = destroying America = creating Amerika. Americans must pay for the bulk of future International and Global taxation whilst NOT being allowed to govern or dominate the global empire its warriors are fighting and dying for in the ME. The Left > Americans are not allowed to govern our own nation anymore, by and for ourselves, because of our many, innumerable "errors in judgement" = willful warmongering imperialist ways and foreign policies = Americans demand to be ruled by non-Americans and anti-Americans anyway. NOTHING SAYS PROSPEROUS UNIVERSALIST LAISSEZ FAIRE GLOBAL UTOPIA THAN THE TRAGIC BUT NECESSARY, SOCIALIST STATE-PLANNED, HOLOCAUST AND EXTERMINATION OF 200 MILYUHN AMERICAN CITIZENS; NOR 5-1/2 BILYUHN OF THE WORLD'S 6.0BILYUHN, both +/-, AFTER THAT. American Holocaust is good for America, the enviro, and for Globalism and Socialism, etc. True Hyper-correct Clintonian Fascist = Communist, Socialists = Capitalists, Cops/Judges/Law = Mafiosi, Laissez Faire = Regulation-Absolutism, American Army = Red Army,...........................@ Patriotskis demand to be suppressed and repressed, and sent to the re-education or death camps by our own Government anyways, you lucky winner dogs you!?
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-01-17 01:30  

00:00