You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Fifth Column
Traitor Daniel Ellsberg: Exposing Secrets May Save (Enemy) Lives
2006-01-16
Daniel Ellsberg, who leaked the Pentagon Papers 35 years ago, said Friday that whistleblowers shouldn't be afraid to reveal government secrets in an effort to save people's lives, even if it means going to jail. "Don't do what I did," Ellsberg said. "Don't wait until the bombs are falling in Iran. Don't wait until people are dying. Go to the press and reveal."
Since it's still 1969 in Ellsberg's head, bombs falling anywhere are a bad thing. But wait! I wonder. . . would bombs falling on Cleveland be a bad thing in his estimation? Or bombs falling on San Francisco? I suspect Cleveland would be okay, but San Francisco not okay. . .
Ellsberg told the American Bar Association's Forum on Communications Law that he waited nearly two years before handing over the top secret study of the Vietnam War to The New York Times in 1971. "I wasted 22 months," he said, advising others planning to leak materials to "take your risks and go to prison if it means saving lives." He compared the Pentagon Papers revelations to the recent New York Times disclosures that President Bush had authorized wiretapping the phone conversations of U.S. citizens without court authorization. He also noted that the Times has acknowledged holding that story for a year at the White House's request.

Ellsberg shared the stage at the gathering of some 250 First Amendment lawyers with other players in the Pentagon Papers drama, including former New York Times Executive Editor Max Frankel and former Times attorney James C. Goodale. They gave vivid recollections of key decisions that shaped the historical case. Asked about his newspaper's concerns about exposing a secret government report, Frankel, then the Times Washington bureau chief, said he was more concerned about the consequences of not publishing. "The frame of mind of people at my level was, 'It's a hot story and how do we get it out and damn the consequences,'" he said. "The first instinct and the last instinct is to get it out.
With that particular mindset there's no instinct to protect information that might harm the country as a whole, only a selfish urge to splash a headline. . .
David Rudinstine, dean of the Cardozo School of Law in New York and author of a book on the Pentagon Papers case, also noted that the existence of the Internet has made it harder to keep information from being publicized once it is leaked. "Once it's out there, you can't restrain it," he said.
What a despicable lot. I'm literally at a loss for words.
Posted by: Anonymoose

#7  Reminds me of the Jay Leno joke about Browns fans, just after some of them had pelted the field one game with beer bottles --

"Hey, did you hear that Budweiser is coming out with a new bottle for their beer? It's 44 ounces big. 44 ounces! Or as Cleveland Browns fans call them, 'daisycutters' ..."
Posted by: Steve White   2006-01-16 14:23  

#6  Sea -
Tell ya what - I think if we took about a half dozen of the most rabid fans out of the Dawg Pound at a Sunday afternoon Browns game and told them, 'No more beer until you conquer North Korea', we'd solve this in about twenty minutes TOPS. :)

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2006-01-16 09:04  

#5  Ellsberg = smells from the past,

even the mosts trusted scum Cronkite is chiming in.
Posted by: Red Dog   2006-01-16 09:00  

#4  Can we warn Muck first?
Posted by: 6   2006-01-16 06:36  

#3   would bombs falling on Cleveland be a bad thing in his estimation? Or bombs falling on San Francisco? I suspect Cleveland would be okay, but San Francisco not okay. . .

Cleveland = Not Okay. Too many union voters, and the Rock-n-Roll Hall of Fame. Plus Drew Carey.

Austin. Now there's a city that needs to get that smug grin wiped off its face...
Posted by: Seafarious   2006-01-16 02:19  

#2  Incredible! But at least a nice recent picture of Danny boy...is that him on the left?
Posted by: Inspector Clueso   2006-01-16 01:38  

#1  Yep, the new Repub Nixon Admin got the blame for what was planned or occurred during the Dems Kennedy and LBJ years, even for the now notorious actions of the "Chicago 7" at Convention time. Someone or some nations, i.e. a Few, have to make the decisions for everyone - you know, Laissez Faire Universalism - and just because many Lefties come back from the USSR/Red China disillusioned ergo America has to be like Russia-China + be governed by them. The Lefties want America to be ruled by nations they themselves hate or don't wanna move to.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-01-16 00:50  

00:00