You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Cancer Researcher Admits to Faking Data
2006-01-15
What IS it with the Lancet? And with scientists faking research?
Happens much more often than you think. I've seen two instances of forged data in my career (one person got nailed by the NIH, the other person -- so far -- has gotten away with it). There is enormous pressure to get a finding out first, particularly if the finding is considered 'big' or if it is going to attraction grant or pharma dollars. There's no prize for coming in second to clone a given cell, for example. That's what happened here: the cancer researcher wanted to be first, and decided he could pull it off. It almost never works, just as a career criminial never thinks he'll be caught. Everyone else is too smart, and communications are so fast today.
A Norwegian cancer researcher has admitted fabricating data published in a renowned international medical journal, officials in Norway said Saturday. The researcher at Norway's Comprehensive Cancer Center, who was not identified, used faked patient data in an article on oral cancer published in the October 2005 issue of The Lancet, Britain's leading medical journal, said Stein Vaaler, strategy director for the cancer center.
They can soon start referring to it as "the formerly prestigious British medical journal"...
The article claimed that a certain kind of drug decreased the risk of getting oral cancer and referred to results seen in patients in two national databases, Vaaler said in an interview. A colleague raised questions about the article when it was published, and when the researcher was confronted this week about the data, he acknowledged the fabrication, Vaaler said. "All of it was fabricated," Vaaler said. "It was not manipulation of real data — it was just complete fabrication."
"Yeah. We needed some numbers, so I just polled some out of my butt..."
The Washington-based journal Science announced Thursday that it was unconditionally retracting two papers by South Korean stem cell researcher Hwang Woo-suk, who publicly apologized for faking data that purported to show the creation of stem cells from the world's first cloned human embryos.
He's toast, and so is his collaborator in Pittsburgh who was last seen backpedaling furiously.
Vaaler said the center has informed The Lancet about the fabrication, and an external review committee will examine the researcher's methods and his previous publications. A decision about whether the researcher should be fired will be made after the review committee issues its report, Vaaler said.
Oh, he'll be fired -- no journal will ever publish anything with his name on it ever again. And the journal editors talk to each other.
I'm sure he's got a rewarding career in the food service industry in front of him...
"This is a very serious situation for the hospital," the center's director, Aage Danielsson, said in a letter to colleagues that was posted on the Web site of The Norwegian broadcaster TV2. There was no immediate reaction from The Lancet.
Too busy going over the proofs for their Page 3 girl?
Posted by:lotp

#4  it is surprising only that there is not more fraud in science and academics

Science is a process and not a system of beliefs. It relies on reproducible experiments and testable theories. You can get away with scams and fraud, but eventually, you will get found out.

In the academic world in general, where the testing and checking is lacking, the situation is a little different.
Posted by: SteveS   2006-01-15 09:57  

#3  Maybe soon they will start to refer to it as the "influential" Lancet, like the "influential" Association of Muslim Scholars. You know, those lying loser guys.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-01-15 09:56  

#2  Happens much more often than you think. I've seen two instances of forged data in my career

I don't know how often you have the chance to observe researchers in your career, Dr. White, but I suspect often enough that two instances isn't a lot. We're talking about human beings who are relatively unsupervised with substantial egos.

When you consider the lies the management of Enron, Tyco and Adelphia were able to perpetrate in the face of outside auditors, legal, SEC and analyst review it is surprising only that there is not more fraud in science and academics in general given the rather less stringent vetting.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-01-15 09:00  

#1  Don't forget it was the Lancet that printed the phony 100,000 death toll figure for Iraq in 2004 when the actual death toll was more like about 20,000. The phony figure was seized on by the BBC of course who beat it up in anti-US style:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm

The report was discredited but of course it still pops up everywhere as people just LOVE to quote discredited figures when they agree with it.

You have to go a fair few pages in on Google before you find a result that exposes this phony figure as you'll be snowed under with search results repeating it as if it were fact.

Here's one debunking:
http://reclusiveantiquarian.blogspot.com/2006/01/fabricating-iraqs-death-toll.html

Here's the Washington Times debunking:
http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20060104-085709-7440r.htm

Here's the Andrew Bolt debunking (now removed from the herald sun but reprinted here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1366322/posts

Posted by: anon1   2006-01-15 08:37  

00:01