You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Hillary Sez Lack of Body Armor is 'Unforgivable'
2006-01-11
Been There / Done That / F**kin' Duh Dept. She needs a new Staff Slimer.
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton called the Bush administration "incompetent" when it came to protecting the troops in combat and called the lack of adequate body armor for soldiers and Marines "unforgivable."

So far in Iraq, more than 2,100 American troops have been killed. Critics like Clinton, D-N.Y., say that many of these deaths are the result of inadequate body armor. A secret Pentagon study of 93 Marines who were killed in Iraq found that 74 died after they were hit by a bullet or shrapnel in the torso or shoulders — areas unprotected by the armor most are issued.

"We perhaps could have avoided so many of these fatalities with the right body armor," said Clinton, who recently wrote letters to Sen. John Warner, R-Va., chairman of the Armed Services Committee; Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., the ranking Democrat on the Armed Services Committee; and Francis J. Harvey, secretary of the Army, calling for an investigation into why troops were not being protected.

Clinton pointed to President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney as the culprits. Some have said that supplying Marines and soldiers with armor that covers their sides is too expensive — costing about $260 for each person. Clinton said that considering the United States' defense budget was half a trillion dollars, the additional protection was affordable. She said the administration had refused to listen to people in the field like Paul Bremer, former ambassador to Iraq, who said the United States needed more troops in Iraq to pacify the country.

"This is Bush/Cheney policy. 
 I've been one of the leading critics pointing out all the failures, the incompetencies," Clinton said. "I am just bewildered as to how this president and this vice president continue to isolate themselves from different point of views. He's [President Bush has] got three more years in office. Some of us wish this wasn't the case."

Congress recently passed a law to reimburse troops who purchased the armor themselves, but Clinton said not all of those people had been given their money.


"It's our duty to protect our men and women in uniform," said Clinton, who is rumored to be considering a run for the White House in 2008. "They are protecting us, our interest. They have been sent there by our president. The very least we can do is give them the very best body armor and armored vehicle."

The lack of adequate armor has been a hot topic during the war in Iraq. In 2004, a soldier confronted Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld during a Q&A session in Iraq about the issue. The question turned out to be planted by a journalist. Recently, Howard Dean, former presidential candidate and president of the Democratic National Committee, called for Rumsfeld to resign.

The Defense Department and Army said that they needed more time to acquire the armor and that publicly discussing issues of body armor aided the enemy — claims that Clinton dismissed as out of hand.

She said it was now incumbent on the president to stand up for the men and women fighting overseas in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"The president speaks out strongly and even harshly from time to time about issues he thinks are important," Clinton said. "Let's hear him speak about men and women who wear the uniform of our country."
Better ask the troops, since you can't seem to read fast enough to keep up with the BDS meme failure curve.
Posted by:.com

#13  Another Hillaryous drool-fest!
Posted by: Hyper   2006-01-11 12:50  

#12  I wonder what will happen to military recruitment and retention if-- God help us-- Hillary gets elected President in 2008.
Posted by: Dave D.   2006-01-11 12:01  

#11  If the troops lacked body armor, the body count would be MUCH higher. I can’t imagine that you could go into battle with one of those armor suits that eh XOD people wear or anything close to that. Still find it hard to believe any story of troops “lacking” body armor when they are deployed to Iraq. Of course certain exception will be made in the case of a Pvt Cassini and their ilk. While I am far far from knowing, I checked a few sites and could find any body armor that was any better than what I was issued. If there was something better I might invest in some if I was deploying to the sandbox. P.S. HILLARY CLINTON CAN GO TO HELL!
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2006-01-11 11:45  

#10  Call the Israelis ant tell them we need that nano-armor NOW!

No need to call Tel Aviv - there is some awesome stuff in the prototype stage right here in our own labs.
Posted by: lotp   2006-01-11 11:05  

#9  This is Hillary trying to stake out an anti-Bush position to attract the left wing in the primaries without engaging in actual anti-war rhetoric that will lose her the general. She's going to keep getting pushed farther and farther left by the party and here own gut desire to tear down the establishment '68.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-01-11 09:59  

#8  Max BS meter.

You know lady, if you wanted to reduce US sevice casualties you should have spoken up before Fallujha and recommended to place be leveled like St. Lo was in 1944. Damn civilian casualties. Did you? Piece of low level political grandstanding self centered positioning two bit hack.
Posted by: Speretle Thitle4440   2006-01-11 09:58  

#7  Fred,
"I'm still trying to figure how we got through WWII ..."
Several hundred thousand dead. Of course 70 pound body armor might have made things even worse at Tarawa and Omaha.
Posted by: Glenmore   2006-01-11 09:35  

#6  Hush, Fred. You're interfering in the good Senator's spotlight. She's had to keep her lip zipped lo these many weeks; "No comment" on NSA surveillance and secret Euro prisons. Finally she has a meme she can feed to the moonbats and you wanna rain on her parade.
Posted by: Seafarious   2006-01-11 09:32  

#5  I'm still trying to figure how we got through WWII without body army and with all those unarmored Jeeps and trucks.
Posted by: Fred   2006-01-11 09:12  

#4  Call the Israelis ant tell them we need that nano-armor NOW!
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-01-11 09:10  

#3  Hillary could champion new body armor for all along with a 20% pay raise in 2007 and they'd still flip her the bird. Stupid they ain't. She's toast.
Posted by: Creck Ulagum6581   2006-01-11 07:55  

#2  Michelle Malkin has some choice words on Hillary's wet-finger stance...

Ponting out what we read on the 8th, U.S. Soldiers Question Use of More Armor, heh.

As I said, she's mighty sloooow on the uptake...
Posted by: .com   2006-01-11 03:22  

#1  Damn. Link.
Posted by: .com   2006-01-11 02:09  

00:00