| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Perspective: Create an e-annoyance, go to jail |
| 2006-01-09 |
| Will this be the end of Rantburg as we know it - Gee thanks W In other words, it's OK to flame someone on a mailing list or in a blog as long as you do it under your real name. Thank Congress for small favors, I guess. |
| Posted by:Yosemite Sam |
| #8 The US Constitution says Americans can own guns and can speak on any issue without having said speech to be copyrighted or patented. State and Federal Caselaws and Statutes say Americans don't have to do anything that we think is wrong or morally incomprehensible, nor do we have to obey any contract or agreement, oral and or written, where criminal activity or action is part of the inducement/begotiation, part of the terms, andor the outcome of said contract or agreement, and no matter if said contract is executed or anticipatory, current or future, etc. The Spetzlamies are just a bloody, violent, hyper-correct MSM and geopol diversion - the real threat to America right now is from CREEPING SOCIALISM/COMMUNISM - iff America doesn't go Socialist 2015-2020, the Failed/Angry Left and anti-US forces reserve their singular and unconditional right to destroy the USA vv MAD nuke war. Steve Hoagland on COASDTTOCOASTAM argues that alleged GLOBAL GULAGISTS intend to destroy approximately 5 1/2 BILLION, plus-minus, persons for OWG, [Global]Resources-control, and Global Utopia -WHOM GETS TO BE ONE OF THE 500 MILLION, OR LESS, OF THE HUMAN POPULATION THAT GETS TO LIVE IN GLORIOUS SOCIALIST UTOPIA AND FUTURE OWG; VERSUS WHOM, SOCIALIST OR NON-SOCIALIST, THAT GETS TO BE PROPERLY/PC "ELIMINATED" FOR THE GOOD OF THE SURVIVORS, FOR HILLARY'S UNIVERSAL/COMMON GOOD = BENEFIT OF A HANDFUL/FEW!? Hoaglands belief shows that even for Socialists their desired future OWG and future Socialist World isn't big enough for Socialism and alleged Socialist ideals of alleged "UNIVERSAL EQUALISM, WELFARISM, SUFFRAGE AND DIVERSITY, ETC"!? NOT EVEN FOR A SIMPLE, ALL-BY-ITSELF, NO-FRILLS WHITE XMAS = HOLIDAY, etc. PC STAR ON A SIMPLE, ALL-BY-ITSELF, NO-FRILLS GREEN XMAS = HOLIDAY, etc. PC SIMPLE TREE. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2006-01-09 23:40 |
| #7 Specter is really starting to piss me off. It bad enough he's a Rhino but to top it off he is a case of primo asshole. |
| Posted by: 3dc 2006-01-09 22:42 |
| #6 To grease the rails for this idea, Sen. Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican, and the section's other sponsors slipped it into an unrelated, must-pass bill to fund the Department of Justice. The plan: to make it politically infeasible for politicians to oppose the measure. Something needs to be done about this crap. Doesn't matter who does it, Reps or Dems, it's gotta stop. |
| Posted by: Bomb-a-rama 2006-01-09 20:23 |
| #5 What kinda shoos? |
| Posted by: Glomoper Cleath8438 2006-01-09 19:34 |
| #4 So what are they going to do? Trace IP addresses, do all kinds of computer forensics? Because you annoyed someone? Some asshole hacked my credit card number once and bought 50 pairs of shoes in europe, they didn't do shit to find out who that guy was. They couldnt care less from the way they talked. Now you can get two years for roasting someone on the net. Give me a break |
| Posted by: (not)bigjim-ky 2006-01-09 18:28 |
| #3 (The Justice Department won't file charges in every case, of course, but trusting prosecutorial discretion is hardly reassuring.) Heh. No kidding. The article seems to pin the blame on Arlen Specter. |
| Posted by: eLarson 2006-01-09 16:47 |
| #2 I guess they'd have to throw Ben Franklin (and many others) who routinely used pseudonyms, in the pokey. I thought I voted for smaller, less intrusive government. My bad. |
| Posted by: Perfesser 2006-01-09 15:15 |
| #1 The law will not pass a court chalenge. You have no right not to be offended or annoyed. |
| Posted by: Sock Puppet O´ Doom 2006-01-09 14:47 |