You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
120 massacred as carnage returns to Iraq
2006-01-06
Two suicide bombers killed 120 people and wounded more than 200 in attacks near a Shiite holy shrine and a police recruiting centre on Thursday, the bloodiest day in Iraq for four months. Iraq's prime minister denounced the violence as an attempt to derail the political. But Iraq's largest Shiite party, the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution (SCIRI) in Iraq, blamed Sunni Arab groups that fared poorly in the elections for inciting the violence. SCIRI warned that Shiite patience was wearing thin and accused the U.S.-led coalition forces of restraining the Iraqi army and its police and security forces.

The suicide bombers struck in Kerbala, one of Shiite Islam's holiest cities, and Ramadi, a Sunni Arab stronghold in western Anbar province and a hotbed of the insurgency. The Kerbala bomber detonated an explosive belt laced with ball bearings and a grenade, killing 50 and wounding 138 at a market within sight of the golden dome of the Imam Hussein shrine, one of the holiest sites in Shiite Islam. Television pictures showed pools of blood in the street, which was littered with debris. Passers-by loaded the wounded into the backs of cars and vans, and one black-clad woman stood crying while clutching her dead or wounded baby to her chest.

About an hour after the Kerbala blast, another bomber blew himself up near police recruits in the western city of Ramadi, killing 70 people and wounding 65, hospital sources said. The U.S. military said the blast ripped through a line of some 1,000 men waiting to be security screened at a glass and ceramics works that was used as a temporary recruiting centre. After the debris and body parts had been cleared away, hundreds of Iraqis returned to the queue, the military said.

Coming a day after 58 people died in a wave of bombings and shootings, the latest bloodshed ratcheted up tension between Iraq's minority Sunni Arabs and majority Shiites. "This is a war against Shiites," said Rida Jawad al-Takia, a senior SCIRI member. "Apparently to the terrorists, no Shiite child or woman should live," he told Reuters. "We are really worried. It seems they want a civil war."

In a separate statement, SCIRI said that U.S.-led coalition forces were preventing Iraq's army and police from stopping insurgents, an apparent reference to increased American oversight of Shiite-dominated security forces following widespread charges of abuse - especially of Sunni Arab detainees. "The multinational forces, and the political entities that declared their support for terrorism, bear the responsibility for the bloodshed that happened in the recent few days. They should know that the patience of our people will not last for a long time," it said.

"It's an odious crime which shows the savagery and sectarianism of these criminals," said Jawad al-Maliki, a top leader from Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari's Daawa party, speaking of the attack in Kerbala. "They are trying to change the results through terror," he said in a veiled reference to complaints by Sunni-based parties of ballot-rigging in the poll.

President Jalal Talabani blamed the attacks on "groups of dark terror" and said they would fail to stop Iraqis forming a national unity government capable of meeting the demands of the country's rival sects and ethnic groups.

A senior official in the Iraqi Accordance Movement, the main minority Sunni coalition, denounced the violence and called for solidarity among Iraqis to defeat it, but he blamed the government for allowing it to happen. "This government has not only failed to end violence, but it has become an accomplice in the cycle of violence by adopting sectarian policies and by weakening the state and strengthening militia groups," Izzat al-Shahbandar said.
Posted by:Fred

#10  Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution? Gwad we are freeing the sand people and they want to run right to full conversion of the porKorAnimals.
Posted by: Muhamhead Screwed My Pig Allah   2006-01-06 07:33  

#9  ..and our rules about releasing terrorists after a certain number of days if there is no evidence.

Isn't this sort of like a law enforcement approach to the problem?
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2006-01-06 16:03  

#8  Whatever happened to "take a number"? What's so difficult about this? Why keep lining up like lambs to slaughter? When they're ready for #35, hang the number out a window or use a bullhorn. Is there anyone in Iraq reading this who can pass the word?
Posted by: KBK   2006-01-06 14:18  

#7  TW: Who says American troops are going to pull out completely?

Iraq, unlike Afghanistan, has oil. The Taliban lived off table scraps from Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. Iraq doesn't need Uncle Sam to survive economically. And the Iranian-sponsored elements of Iraq have, well, Iran as their sugar daddy, just as the Taliban had Pakistan. The fact is that the Iraqi government can tell us to get out tomorrow. I am beginning to believe the polls that say that 80% of Iraqis want us out. Not because they don't like GI's, but because unreasonable decisions from Uncle Sam (in regard to torture and habeas corpus) are getting thousands of Iraqis killed every month.*

During the Malayan Emergency, which many Brits like to use as a touchstone, captured communist terrorists - the term in use at the time - were tortured for information and held without charge, some for the rest of their lives.

* If thousands of Americans were getting killed monthly, would we adhere to the same rules? I seriously doubt it. But we are forcing Iraqis to adhere to these rules, and there is nothing they can do about it - unless they tell us to leave. Upon which we probably will, unless we want to jeopardize our base agreements in other countries - since these agreements are based on our willingness to leave when asked to.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2006-01-06 11:04  

#6  I deleted the comment.
Posted by: Pappy   2006-01-06 11:02  

#5  Working on it...but I think Fred needs to put a little caulk around the sink trap...
Posted by: Seafarious   2006-01-06 08:13  

#4  I vote the boar-ing muhammed be permanently banned.
Posted by: 2b   2006-01-06 07:40  

#3  Who says American troops are going to pull out completely? Troop reductions are taking place in Iraq, and that's good, because our guys need a bit of rest and refurbishment before the next stage. But I don't see how we could in good conscience safely leave the Iraqis to their own devices for at least a generation -- the discussion above demonstrates the need for us to maintain an armed presence until these people give up and become civilized. Otherwise we'll have to reinvade well within a decade, to prevent Iraq from becoming another Al Qaeda playground like Somalia or Sudan.
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-01-06 07:27  

#2  SCIRI warned that Shiite patience was wearing thin and accused the U.S.-led coalition forces of restraining the Iraqi army and its police and security forces.

Despite his best intentions, Bush's WoT maybe yield success after all---Muzzies are too busy to be a threat to the rest of the World while they massacre each other.
Posted by: gromgoru   2006-01-06 05:18  

#1  Article: In a separate statement, SCIRI said that U.S.-led coalition forces were preventing Iraq's army and police from stopping insurgents, an apparent reference to increased American oversight of Shiite-dominated security forces following widespread charges of abuse - especially of Sunni Arab detainees. "The multinational forces, and the political entities that declared their support for terrorism, bear the responsibility for the bloodshed that happened in the recent few days. They should know that the patience of our people will not last for a long time," it said.

My prediction is that American forces will be forced out over our touchiness about torture and our rules about releasing terrorists after a certain number of days if there is no evidence. And the fallout? A bloodbath against Sunnis once the Shiites get full control, and pesky American troops are no longer around. And possibly an Iran-aligned Shiite government, since Iranian-sponsored groups will have the biggest guns once we're no longer around. And for what? Some fundamentalist leftist beliefs about torture and habeas corpus? Jesus wept.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2006-01-06 01:11  

00:00